Boppawombat
Member
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 47
I can't agree with you at all on this one. It's very judgemental to tar everyone from those areas with the same brush. I don't find the "clientèle" of the Kirkby line too bad actually. Parts of Fazakerley are very pleasant and not everyone who boards at Rice Lane or Kirkby is a troublemaker by any means.
More significantly, you get these sorts of people in just the same (or higher) numbers on almost any suburban rail network in the country. Some of the types I've seen on the London Overground North London and Watford lines you wouldn't believe. That doesn't mean everyone who uses those services is like that, though.
Furthermore, I don't see what this has to do with the initial point - the main problems are capacity and (external) cleanliness.
Sorry if I strayed off into another area with that digression, but I was just continuing on from your remarks about the scruffy state of the trains on Merseyrail so I merely pointed out that they were scruffy because some people just don't respect their surroundings, hence I brought up the subject of certain sectors of society leaving their calling cards behind. I can't deny that they exist though, but I do my best to tolerate them, I guess.
Re: Capacity - Six car trains are pretty rare at the best of times (I think only TWO train diagrams on the Chester route and ONE on the West Kirby route is comprised of a six car formation..... )
When the new trains arrive though, it's anybody's guess what sort of seating arrangement they may have - is it 2 abreast or a reversion to the original high-density 3 + 2 abreast that the 507/508s originally had before their 2005/6 refurbishment programmes reduced the seating....?
One can only speculate.