Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
In all my 76 years, I have honestly never heard that term mentioned....do I need to get out more?Largest muscles in the human body! Otherwise known as....
In all my 76 years, I have honestly never heard that term mentioned....do I need to get out more?Largest muscles in the human body! Otherwise known as....
Actually it's 'gluteus maximus', there's also 'gluteus medius' and 'gluteus minimus' in the same muscle group. And the contraction "glutes" has been in use for at least ten years, apparently.It's a contraction of gluteus maximum, and a relatively recent one at that
All of them, mostly scams and lies.
Newman.com sell £50 blood tests when it’s free at the doctorsCan you qualify that?
TV ads are mostly 'buy x food brand, it tastes nice' or 'buy this mattress / sofa / chair, it's comfy and is £50 off'. While consumers' preferences are subjective I don't exactly see a lot of scams or out-and-out lies in ads.
Newman.com sell £50 blood tests when it’s free at the doctors
Never ending sales at DFS and it’s never 200 of or what ever, they vastly increase prices before the sale
Endless adds for funeral plans after they have told you funerals cost £7000 when you can actually pay £2000
Private medical insurance for £10.99, you would need to be a 18 year old who never leave the house to get it for that
Equity release firms only interested in getting there paws on your home when you die
Endless banks and insurance firms that are by my side, yet they will charge you £20 for a late payment
Then we have tone deaf opera singers who should have been retired 10 years ago and the dam meerkats
Maybe it is not all lies but it certainly is not ethical or honest.
Is that the John Lewis one which offended some idiots because it contained a boy wearing a dress?They have just pulled the one for home insurance about the kid trashing the house, in what way is that not acceptable
The whole system needs a major overhaul, as nlogax said this has been going on for decade’sA few more to add to the list:
Companies selling 'help' for people in serious debt problem in the form of a debt management plan - neglecting to mention exactly the same service is available free of charge via StepChange and PayPlan
Similarly credit reference agencies selling monthly subscriptions when all the relevant information relating to your credit history can easily be obtained free of charge. The also don't mention the 'credit scores', the main selling point of th subscription, are meaningless and are neither used or recognised by any lenders
Promoting gambling as being a perfectly normal and completely harmless part of being a sport fan
Yes it isIs that the John Lewis one which offended some idiots because it contained a boy wearing a dress?
(Yes, I know that's not why they pulled it)
Or it could have been ,something done on purpose would not be covered and this was not mentioned in the addThe whole system needs a major overhaul, as nlogax said this has been going on for decade’s
I won’t start on gambling. It’s horrendous.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Yes it is
Sorry, don't agree. They are not annoying, they are at the very least infuriating in my mind. They are preying on the vulnerable at a time when they are most desperate. I agree with @nlogax that they are not scammers, but they appear to be mealy mouthed and insincere. I would put them in the same Circle as scammers should I ever rewrite Dante's Inferno. You are right about the (wide range) of organisations offering a free service, but also these will decide whether an IVA (the debt management plan) is the one most suitable, not the one that gives the organisation most profit. The one that really annoys me is the one with the woman who has dyed bright red hair who clearly doesn't have a conscience if her willingness to read that script out is anything to go by.A few more to add to the list:
Companies selling 'help' for people in serious debt problem in the form of a debt management plan - neglecting to mention exactly the same service is available free of charge via StepChange and PayPlan
...
What don't you agree with?Sorry, don't agree. They are not annoying, they are at the very least infuriating in my mind. They are preying on the vulnerable at a time when they are most desperate. I agree with @nlogax that they are not scammers, but they appear to be mealy mouthed and insincere. I would put them in the same Circle as scammers should I ever rewrite Dante's Inferno. You are right about the (wide range) of organisations offering a free service, but also these will decide whether an IVA (the debt management plan) is the one most suitable, not the one that gives the organisation most profit. The one that really annoys me is the one with the woman who has dyed bright red hair who clearly doesn't have a conscience if her willingness to read that script out is anything to go by.
Anyone struggling with debt could do worse than look at Free debt advice: get help with your debt problems - MSE (moneysavingexpert.com). List of organisations that will help, description of those that are out for themselves.
Its not annoying - too mild a term for me! Dreams, Smart Meters, the Meerkats, they are annoying, these are worse than that, not even annoying turned up to 11. You may disagree and that's fine, but to me the paid for Debt Advisors ads leave a nasty taste in my mouth that most ads don't.What don't you agree with?
Yes, I agree. My post was a direct follow on to stevetay3's list of ads falling under the category of scam, dishonest or unethical.Its not annoying - too mild a term for me! Dreams, Smart Meters, the Meerkats, they are annoying, these are worse than that, not even annoying turned up to 11. You may disagree and that's fine, but to me the paid for Debt Advisors ads leave a nasty taste in my mouth that most ads don't.
Hi Big Tim, sorry, missed your post, but we sing from the same song sheet regarding Parsley Box. I'm sure it's an attempt by the ad agents to spice up the silver daters dining experience. Not for me though.I haven’t seen that advert for some time, but I share your pain! I mentioned it in this thread (post 33) back in March
Newman.com sell £50 blood tests when it’s free at the doctors
Never ending sales at DFS and it’s never 200 of or what ever, they vastly increase prices before the sale
Endless adds for funeral plans after they have told you funerals cost £7000 when you can actually pay £2000
Private medical insurance for £10.99, you would need to be a 18 year old who never leave the house to get it for that
Equity release firms only interested in getting there paws on your home when you die
Endless banks and insurance firms that are by my side, yet they will charge you £20 for a late payment
Then we have tone deaf opera singers who should have been retired 10 years ago and the dam meerkats
Maybe it is not all lies but it certainly is not ethical or honest.
They have just pulled the one for home insurance about the kid trashing the house, in what way is that not acceptable
Is that the John Lewis one which offended some idiots because it contained a boy wearing a dress?
(Yes, I know that's not why they pulled it)
It was attacked as everything from a crass cultural lecture to a treatise on sexism. John Lewis’s latest home insurance ad, in which a young boy rampages around his home to a Stevie Nicks song while wearing a dress, became the latest front in a seemingly never-ending culture war this month.
Now, it has been pulled – not because of any sensibilities it may have offended, but because regulators were concerned it could mislead people into thinking the insurance policy being advertised would cover a child smashing up the house.
Have you ever considered using the "off button?
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I thought that was quite a good advert!
It was pulled because it was thought to potentially be misleading:
![]()
John Lewis pulls controversial advert for being ‘potentially misleading’
Home insurance ad featuring a boy in a dress taken off air after financial regulator warningwww.theguardian.com
Have you ever considered using the "off button?
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I thought that was quite a good advert!
It was pulled because it was thought to potentially be misleading:
![]()
John Lewis pulls controversial advert for being ‘potentially misleading’
Home insurance ad featuring a boy in a dress taken off air after financial regulator warningwww.theguardian.com
So I should push the off button then and miss a program I want to watch so these greedy B******S can carry on boring us silly.I'm sad I missed it - not least because I myself have been known to rampage around the room to Stevie Nicks songs (albeit not, thus far in a dress).
So I should push the off button then and miss a program I want to watch so these greedy B******S can carry on boring us silly.
I think every sane person uses the mute button but the way things are we will soon ware out the mute button.Showing the same rubbish every other ad brake. is not on, I avoid using firms that do this.I usually mute the adverts and do something else instead personally.
Sorry, it is something I feel strongly about. These companies are the lowest of the low; because they take commission, the debtor pays more but less also goes to those organisations that are owed money, such as the council, so less money goes to council services. I should blame them for my (quite) high blood pressure!Yes, I agree. My post was a direct follow on to stevetay3's list of ads falling under the category of scam, dishonest or unethical.
You do not get add breaks on sky sports you get program breaks and before someone says don’t subscribe then. I won’t be when my contract ends.I have been watching quite a bit of televised sport channels, most of the ad breaks include ads for erectile dysfunction treatments, hair loss / colouring for men or expensive cars.
Like a televised mid-life crisis.