The Mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, Paul Bristow, has pushed for a new railway station at Alconbury Weald.
www.huntspost.co.uk
A "transformational" railway station could be built on a housing development after support from t the Mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.
Paul Bristow visited Alconbury Weald, which will eventually deliver 6,500 new homes, to campaign for a new railway station on the site.
The Urban&Civic development has been identified as an Opportunity Zone in the Combined Authority's Local Plan - meaning it will bring investment into Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.
I think if he has ideas of spurs etc from the ECML he is in cloud cuckoo land. A simple two platform station could be built and also serve Abbots Ripton, but it would be quite a walk to the centre of Alconbury Weald. We do seem good at building houses a bit too far away from railway lines...
This is a good summary. Alconbury Weald is where it is because it is an old RAF airfield. The relevant comparison is with Waterbeach, where development is also on an old RAF airfield, and where there will be a new 2 platform station, though without any track alterations. The difficulties with funding the Waterbeach station demonstrate the challenges that face the Alconbury Weald proposal.
As Alconbury Weald expands it will be towards the ECML, the eastern end of the runway was not far from the railway. The removal of the up slow line when the ECML was electrified is what prevents Alconbury Weald from getting a new 2 platform station, though without any track alterations, like at Waterbeach. The saga of reinstating the up slow line between Conington and Huntingdon is well covered elsewhere, here it is only necessary to say that it is expensive because all of Huntingdon-Conington would need to be rewired.
Superficially, diverting Thameslink into Alconbury Weald has its attractions, but the cost would be huge. It would require grade separation, and has the awkward obstacle that Thameslink have their carriage sidings and traincrew depot at Peterborough. And I doubt that the ECML operators would want to pick up the substantial Huntingdon-Peterborough flow.
Four tracks across Holme Fen is not going to happen either, if it was easy or cheap it would have happened decades ago. When getting out the crayons here it is also important to remember that Thameslink's new Spital sidings are on the up side of the line.
How would Alconbury Weald fit with Tempsford (on East-West Rail)? Can somebody clarify if Tempsford will have platform to interchange with the ECML?
Two additional stations would obviously have material effects on timetabling, journey times to/ from Peterborough in particular and turnaround times at Peterborough.
The comparison with East West Rail is important. Places like Alconbury Weald and Waterbeach are small beer compared to Tempsford and Cambourne, both of which could get to populations of more than 50k.
Tempsford will have interchange between ECML and EWR, but it could be a long walk. Station design isn't finalised yet, though the Chancellor's Oxford speech back in January did commit to the ECML platforms opening without having to wait for EWR.
The timetabling point is important too. It isn't just about turnround at Peterborough but also paths through the Thameslink core, Digswell Viaduct and Holme Fen.