jamesontheroad
Established Member
I always wondered why they built Stansted as a terminus. Same with Manchester, even the 3rd platform you have to think, thats a bit of a waste of space there.
Stansted was designed with the possibility of becoming a through station. Although a lot of stuff has subsequently been built or installed beyond the buffers, there was deliberately nothing designed (structurally) in the way to prevent a future rail line continuing out the other side of the terminal.
Sadly more and more of the terminal is being redeveloped with the bottom line in mind. It was also designed to make landside -> airside a transparent process, with planes visible from check-in. Now you go through security and are forced through a commercial slalom from hell. Plus a certain man called Mick insists on the cheapest possible sheds instead of more comfortable satellites for his flights. </architectural rant>