Hi all
Would appreciate your advice on something. I'm kinda panicking at the moment.
So, back last year I tried to catch a train without a valid ticket. The ticket machine wouldn't accept my card, but I'm aware that's not a valid excuse. When I was caught I offered to pay the fare, or a penalty fare, but the inspector wasn't interested. He took a "statement of facts" which detailed the time, place, etc.
It seems a court summons was issued to my old address (which I knew nothing of until I collected my post) and the case was heard in my absence. The accusation was that I did contravene Byelaw No.9(2)... "in that you did, without permission from an authorised person, enter or leave railway premises without passing through the manned or automatic barrier in the correct manner". I wouldn't dispute the claim, but is it normal (allowed?) to be taken to court without being offered to pay a penalty fare? Given it's happened, I'm guessing they're within their rights, but optimistically I thought I may as well ask.
I can only assume I was found guilty (though I've not seen any correspondence to confirm this) as there was also a "further steps notice" telling me a had to pay £360. The deadline fast approaching and not having learned great deal from legal / citizen's advice, I decided to pay the money to stop things being taken any further.
The fine, though painful, I can deal with. My major concern is the consequences of the conviction (if I can call it that? Not that I've even seen documentation confirming a conviction). What exactly does it mean? I understand it's not a "criminal record" as such, but I'm still not sure whether or not it could show up in background checks, etc. I work in the city on a consultancy basis, so my background gets checked reasonably frequently.
Thanks in advance
Sam
Would appreciate your advice on something. I'm kinda panicking at the moment.
So, back last year I tried to catch a train without a valid ticket. The ticket machine wouldn't accept my card, but I'm aware that's not a valid excuse. When I was caught I offered to pay the fare, or a penalty fare, but the inspector wasn't interested. He took a "statement of facts" which detailed the time, place, etc.
It seems a court summons was issued to my old address (which I knew nothing of until I collected my post) and the case was heard in my absence. The accusation was that I did contravene Byelaw No.9(2)... "in that you did, without permission from an authorised person, enter or leave railway premises without passing through the manned or automatic barrier in the correct manner". I wouldn't dispute the claim, but is it normal (allowed?) to be taken to court without being offered to pay a penalty fare? Given it's happened, I'm guessing they're within their rights, but optimistically I thought I may as well ask.
I can only assume I was found guilty (though I've not seen any correspondence to confirm this) as there was also a "further steps notice" telling me a had to pay £360. The deadline fast approaching and not having learned great deal from legal / citizen's advice, I decided to pay the money to stop things being taken any further.
The fine, though painful, I can deal with. My major concern is the consequences of the conviction (if I can call it that? Not that I've even seen documentation confirming a conviction). What exactly does it mean? I understand it's not a "criminal record" as such, but I'm still not sure whether or not it could show up in background checks, etc. I work in the city on a consultancy basis, so my background gets checked reasonably frequently.
Thanks in advance
Sam