• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Admin charges? (Friend failed to buy a ticket at origin)

Status
Not open for further replies.

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
17,913
Location
0036
Another issue raised is that were there no revenue protection present at LMS anybody in the same situation would not have had to buy a ticket.

This seems to me to be the basis of the argument, and is wrong. Of course they would have had to buy a ticket. Buying a ticket (before travel where possible) is not something you only do because the nasty man on the train comes around or because you get stuck behind some horrid barriers. It is the law.

You also keep referring to a £20 "slap on the wrist". Penalties for non-payment are meant to be a deterrent, not a "slap on the wrist".
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,635
Location
Isle of Man
You also keep referring to a £20 "slap on the wrist". Penalties for non-payment are meant to be a deterrent, not a "slap on the wrist".

Indeed, and sharing that view with RPIs or the TOC will just make things worse. It implies your friend considered the pros and cons of purchasing a ticket, and decided that he'd take the risk of having to fork out £20 every so often.

Tomj93 said:
Not everybody knows the rules, and as many have said time and time again they can be very confusing to interpret. I've spoken to a TOC and they were unsure if administrative fees could be applied- what does that say?

A TOC is perfectly at liberty to charge whatever it wants as an alternative to sending the matter to court. SouthEastern, as we all know, recently charged someone £43,000 as an alternative to court action.

If your friend doesn't like the deal on the table, he's perfectly able to reject it and take the matter to court. He will lose in court, and it will cost him more money in the long term, but that's his choice.
 

34D

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2011
Messages
6,048
Location
Yorkshire
Letter clearly states on behalf of CR, not XC. Would I be correct in saying they owe CR nothing or is it the fact they exited via CR's property means it is CR's responsibility?

In terms of a civil alleged debt, then you are probably right that you your friend owes Chiltern nothing.

In terms of the magistrates court, anyone, including Chiltern Railways, my mother-in-law, or uncle Tom Cobleigh can bring a private prosecution for an alleged criminal matter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top