scotsman
Established Member
- Joined
- 6 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 3,252
Guys, Aspergers is a sliding scale - it affects everyone differently

Safety critical communication is a key part of being a train driver. You will have to communicate with signallers, guards & dispatchers on a daily basis and P Way staff and control from time to time.
I'm no psychiatrist, but would Aspergers be a hindrance in that? Even if it gave the guy who had the say on whether you got the job or not the slightest doubt, would he risk it? One of the problems from the applicants point of view is the sheer number of people who apply for drivers jobs. Lots of these people are very strong applicants, and a lot of those will miss out simply because there are so few jobs available. If there is a guy you have a doubt over and five you dont, is it safe to assume that Aspergers could be a deal breaker? I'm not saying it will be, but it is certainly food for thought.
We know. My question is that if you have one job available and five applicants, one of which has aspergers and four of which who dont, does the aspergers become a factor?
Don't suppose you could go into further detail on what makes a very strong applicant? Do you mean because of a build up of previous work experience or due to specific jobs.
Absolutely not.
That is my question too, and if so have they heard of the Equality Act? Denying someone a job because of a disability is only allowed if the disability definitely affects their ability to do that job competently, and that can only be decided in the case of Asperger by evaluating that person's ability in the field (or a simulation). My guess is they chose to deny me rather than go through that hassle![]()
I think you'll find that operational railway jobs are exempt form the disability discrimination legislation.
The ability to pass the medical is a key part of the selection process. Any medical conditions have to be disclosed, and that is the stage at which their possible impact on work performance would be assessed.
And if I was denied based on the medical on the grounds of Asperger, they would find that they're not exempt from discriminating. There ARE cases in which Equality and Disability acts are ignored (as I said, they'd have to prove I was incapable of doing the job) but it would be challenged. If a blind man went for the job, there's an obvious reason why his disability means he couldn't do it...same with an amputee. Not so with "mental disorders", the severity of the disorder and how it impacts the person is all important.
ALL companies can use this getout clause BTW, they can discriminate if the disability means they are incapable of doing the job, but they have to prove it sufficiently...the rail companies aren't the only ones.
I don't think you are suitable for the driver role. Sorry.
And if I was denied based on the medical on the grounds of Asperger, they would find that they're not exempt from discriminating. There ARE cases in which Equality and Disability acts are ignored (as I said, they'd have to prove I was incapable of doing the job) but it would be challenged. If a blind man went for the job, there's an obvious reason why his disability means he couldn't do it...same with an amputee. Not so with "mental disorders", the severity of the disorder and how it impacts the person is all important.
ALL companies can use this getout clause BTW, they can discriminate if the disability means they are incapable of doing the job, but they have to prove it sufficiently...the rail companies aren't the only ones.
Having has a read of some of the info available online about this condition, I'm afraid that I would have to agree that some of the common "symptoms" are likely to cause concern. Being clumsy, unnecessary physical movements, misscomprehension of spoken communication and especially awkward/ verbose communication.
A more constructive idea, might be for you to approach the RSSB for guidance. Mental health issues are most definitely part of the medical standard. If this kind of condition precludes you from selection, then I'm afraid that you have to accept it. If you take the confrontational line that you have above, then you'll do nothing apart from confirm the prejudices about the condition.

From what I've read most TOC's accept drivers swapping duties - for example a driver swapping to do all lates when another would prefer all earlies.Hi, Hope this is the right forum. My dad drives buses for arriva. It is shift work obviously. In his depot there is a system in which he can swap his duty with another worker via a "swap club". I'm just wondering whether there is such an option on the railways. Thanks![]()
Hi, Hope this is the right forum
Right forum, wrong post. I couldn't say which post you should be piggybacking on, seeing as I only really follow this one, but normally if you have questions of your type, you would start a new thread (post)
No harm done, of course, you're new to the forum :-P

If you do not have a clean drivers licence is there any point applying??
Depends if the TOC specifies if you must have a clean license or not, I don't think many that would check for this, but DRS is one of them but I think they are in the minority!
Of cause if youve got a full clean license it's always worth a quick mention on the app form, can only go in your favor
From what I've read most TOC's accept drivers swapping duties - for example a driver swapping to do all lates when another would prefer all earlies.
To become a train driver am I right it is not an imperative to have held a safety critical position?
.
What pecentage of drivers generally just stick to the allocated shifts (ie mix of lates and earlies) and what percentage tend to enter swap agreements? Just curious really.
Are there more people out ther for example who would prefer all earlies but there's not enough people wishing to swap the other way (or perhaps the other way around)?