Failed Unit
Established Member
Personally I would prefer a new fleet of 390s to IC225s. However they are considerably more expensive.
I wouldn't the mk3 & 4 sets are a league above the pendo in terms of passenger comfort!
As for the ECML in general, not really much need for tilt, 140mph running could be achieved in many places without it such as Peterborough - Grantham, Doncaster - Darlington when signalling technology allows. A lot of the speed restrictions on the Southern end of the route are for tunnels rather / infrastructure (Newark flat crossing) that would not be amended by tilt. North of Darlington maybe, but if I was going to spend mega $ I would probably try and straighten some of the bad curves, bypass Morpeth altogether for express trains.
Other points made on this post - reliability? The 91's don't do bad as the modern railways annual study highlights. Yes if it fails the train is stuffed, however it can be replaced and the coaches are back in service. If a coach gets a problem that requires it to removed from service then the train runs short formed. It is that old debate about what is better units or hauled stock and the old answer both have the pro's and con's.
I would like to point out that just like the WCML the biggest cause of delays on the ECML is not the trains, it is network rail and how busy the line is. On a recent journey we were held at Edinburgh due to the BTP dealing with some morons. This meant we left at 1240 and needed to follow the Scotrail local service as a result the 10 minute delay was now 20 with no chance of catchup. Another journey we left Kings Cross 6 minutes late because a moron with an off-peak ticket decided to get off the train once it had started moving by using the emergency door release. Once we got to York we had lost our platform so we were 19 minutes late on leaving. It is this kind of incident that hammers the ECML were a 5 minute delay dumps you behind a stopper or loses a platform that just can't be recovered, thankfully set failures on the route are rare.