• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

2023 Israel - Hamas / Hezbollah war

Status
Not open for further replies.

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
10,532
Location
Preston Lancs
If you're going to play that game, what would yours be then?
Please, please, please, I know you are a moderator but this is not a game. 10000s people are losing their lives. Potential escalation to WW3. I don’t play games. I am interested in what other people would do.

The truthful answer though is, I really don’t know. Even with the wisdom of Solomon I don’t know.

I just know that doing nothing was most definitely not an option. History tends to suggest if Israel had done nothing, it would have emboldened the other side(s).
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,538
Location
LBK
Serious question, if Hamas had the capability to wipe out Israel what do you think it's actions would be?
That is not a relevant or intellectually honest question in my view, because the genocide is being committed right now in one direction - thanks in large part to the tacit support given by our government and other western governments.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,442
Location
Yorkshire
Please, please, please, I know you are a moderator but this is not a game. 10000s people are losing their lives. Potential escalation to WW3. I don’t play games. I am interested in what other people would do.

The truthful answer though is, I really don’t know.
I thought as much; thanks for confirming.
Even with the wisdom of Solomon I don’t know.
Is this meant to be taken seriously?
I just know that doing nothing was most definitely not an option. History tends to suggest if Israel had done nothing, it would have emboldened the other side(s).
Ah, so "we must do something, this is something, let's do it", have I understood you correctly?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

That is not a relevant or intellectually honest question in my view...
Spot on; some of the questions in this thread are very dubious in nature. I am glad there are people such as yourself who have more time to challenge them than I do.
...because the genocide is being committed right now in one direction - thanks in large part to the tacit support given by our government and other western governments.
Indeed.
 
Last edited:

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,032
Location
Surrey
Please, please, please, I know you are a moderator but this is not a game. 10000s people are losing their lives. Potential escalation to WW3. I don’t play games. I am interested in what other people would do.

The truthful answer though is, I really don’t know. Even with the wisdom of Solomon I don’t know.

I just know that doing nothing was most definitely not an option. History tends to suggest if Israel had done nothing, it would have emboldened the other side(s).
Its enormously complex situation but the West should have slapped down Israel years ago over its approach to contain the Palestinians and let Israels push out others from the West Bank this has just fuelled the tensions. Of course what happened nearly a year ago was diabolical and Israel had to respond but its a consequence of its own actions and fundamentally Netanyahu administration failed to protect its citizens. It also suits Netanyahu to perpetuate this for as long as possible and while he tries to rope Iran into it as well
at rope Iran into as well knowing full well the US wont be able to standby. Meanwhile as you say tens of thousand innocent people are the victims mind you its not the only war going on in the world where that is the outcome.
 
Last edited:

Bungle965

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
2 Jul 2014
Messages
3,384
Location
Calder Valley
Its enormously complex situation but the West should have slapped down Israel years ago over its approach to contain the Palestinians and let Israels push out others from the West Bank this has just fuelled the tensions.
There was very little of this covered in the mainstream media I thought, I think I saw one of the mini documentaries on BBC News quite a few years ago now and found myself shocked with what I was watching and how no one seemed to want to do anything about it.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,054
Location
St Albans
There was very little of this covered in the mainstream media I thought, I think I saw one of the mini documentaries on BBC News quite a few years ago now and found myself shocked with what I was watching and how no one seemed to want to do anything about it.
Unfortunately, there are those who claim that any criticism of the Israeli Government is anti-semitic, especially when referring to the extreme right wing Likud party presently in power. The continual pillaging of the meagre resources of the West Bank Palestinians by Zionists is actively supported by the administration, so even if there was no fighting between the IDF and the neighbouring countries, it is a constant driver of Palestinian resentment and motivates those currently involved in the two war zones.
 

GusB

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
8,164
Location
Elginshire
Unfortunately, there are those who claim that any criticism of the Israeli Government is anti-semitic, especially when referring to the extreme right wing Likud party presently in power. The continual pillaging of the meagre resources of the West Bank Palestinians by Zionists is actively supported by the administration, so even if there was no fighting between the IDF and the neighbouring countries, it is a constant driver of Palestinian resentment and motivates those currently involved in the two war zones.
Unfortunately, much of the time that "Palestinian resentment" is wrongly construed as "terrorism" when people are legitimately trying to hold on to their homes and livelihoods. They cannot rely on the rest of the world to enforce UN resolutions, so they turn to groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah to back them up.

Israel continues to grab land that it isn't entitled to and the world watches without lifting a finger to stop it. Until that stops, there's no hope of any peace. If it wants Hamas and Hezbollah to stop sending rockets, it needs to acknowledge that settlement of Palestinian land is illegal and must stop. Unless the rest of the world acknowledges this fact and applies appropriate sanctions, the violence will continue.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,621
Location
Isle of Man
Serious question, if Hamas had the capability to wipe out Israel what do you think it's actions would be?
If my mum had a saddle she'd be a motorbike.
Unfortunately, much of the time that "Palestinian resentment" is wrongly construed as "terrorism" when people are legitimately trying to hold on to their homes and livelihoods.
Hezbollah was founded as a direct response to Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982, during which the IDF and the puppet Lebanese government they'd installed massacred about 3,500 Shia people in Beirut.

Terrorists and freedom fighters and all that.
 

Cloud Strife

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2014
Messages
2,964
There was very little of this covered in the mainstream media I thought, I think I saw one of the mini documentaries on BBC News quite a few years ago now and found myself shocked with what I was watching and how no one seemed to want to do anything about it.

I think the problem was that the US in particular didn't react when Israel started colonising the West Bank. Had they limited their reach to East Jerusalem and perhaps some bordering areas of Israel, it probably wouldn't be an issue. Now they've gone so far as to place settlements deep within the West Bank, and some of them such as Ari'el are fully functional as towns, not just settlements.
 

BigDog

Member
Joined
24 May 2024
Messages
104
Location
Newcastle
If my mum had a saddle she'd be a motorbike.

Hezbollah was founded as a direct response to Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982, during which the IDF and the puppet Lebanese government they'd installed massacred about 3,500 Shia people in Beirut.

Terrorists and freedom fighters and all that.
Not really, Hamas have made it quite clear they want to remove Israel from the map! How does anyone suggest you negotiate with that?
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,032
Location
Surrey
Unfortunately, much of the time that "Palestinian resentment" is wrongly construed as "terrorism" when people are legitimately trying to hold on to their homes and livelihoods. They cannot rely on the rest of the world to enforce UN resolutions, so they turn to groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah to back them up.

Israel continues to grab land that it isn't entitled to and the world watches without lifting a finger to stop it. Until that stops, there's no hope of any peace. If it wants Hamas and Hezbollah to stop sending rockets, it needs to acknowledge that settlement of Palestinian land is illegal and must stop. Unless the rest of the world acknowledges this fact and applies appropriate sanctions, the violence will continue.
Totally spot on and i had hoped someone like Lammy who knows this is the correct assessment would reassert that message and whilst unlikely to be able to exert real influence over Israel he could at least engage with other countries to try and build a better consensus at the UN. It would also go down well with a lot of UK nationals. But what do we get is Starmer/Lammy now going backwards from previous movement and just reinforcing that Israel can do what it wants.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,621
Location
Isle of Man
How does anyone suggest you negotiate with that?
It's all whataboutery because Hamas don't have the capability. Not even Iran has that capability.

As for why Hamas are so powerful in Gaza, the real reason- as so often- goes straight back to Benjamin Netanyahu. His tactic was to prop up Hamas in order to prolong the internal disputes between Hamas and the much larger (and much more moderate) Palestinian Authority in the West Bank. This meant that the Palestinian Authority were unable to make any moves towards establishing themselves as the Palestinian government.

So how do you negotiate with Hamas? You don't. You negotiate with the Palestinian Authority and enable them to become the government of the whole of the occupied Palestinian territory.

The Times of Israel explains it much better than I:

For years, the various governments led by Benjamin Netanyahu took an approach that divided power between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank — bringing Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to his knees while making moves that propped up the Hamas terror group.

The idea was to prevent Abbas — or anyone else in the Palestinian Authority’s West Bank government — from advancing toward the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Thus, amid this bid to impair Abbas, Hamas was upgraded from a mere terror group to an organization with which Israel held indirect negotiations via Egypt, and one that was allowed to receive infusions of cash from abroad.

...

Most of the time, Israeli policy was to treat the Palestinian Authority as a burden and Hamas as an asset. Far-right MK Bezalel Smotrich, now the finance minister in the hardline government and leader of the Religious Zionism party, said so himself in 2015.

According to various reports, Netanyahu made a similar point at a Likud faction meeting in early 2019, when he was quoted as saying that those who oppose a Palestinian state should support the transfer of funds to Gaza, because maintaining the separation between the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza would prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Totally spot on and i had hoped someone like Lammy who knows this is the correct assessment would reassert that message and whilst unlikely to be able to exert real influence over Israel he could at least engage with other countries to try and build a better consensus at the UN.
Starmer- married to a Jewish woman and raising his children in the Jewish faith- is uniquely placed to apply soft pressure on Israel. Unlike many critics of Israel, Starmer simply cannot be accused of being anti-Semitic; to all intents and purposes, his family is Jewish.

It is therefore as frustrating as it is regrettable that Starmer has instead chosen to go down the route of justifying the Israeli extremism.
 
Last edited:

BigDog

Member
Joined
24 May 2024
Messages
104
Location
Newcastle
It's all whataboutery because Hamas don't have the capability. Not even Iran has that capability.

As for why Hamas are so powerful in Gaza, the real reason- as so often- goes straight back to Benjamin Netanyahu. His tactic was to prop up Hamas in order to prolong the internal disputes between Hamas and the much larger (and much more moderate) Palestinian Authority in the West Bank. This meant that the Palestinian Authority were unable to make any moves towards establishing themselves as the Palestinian government.

So how do you negotiate with Hamas? You don't. You negotiate with the Palestinian Authority and enable them to become the government of the whole of the occupied Palestinian territory.

The Times of Israel explains it much better than I:



== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Starmer- married to a Jewish woman and raising his children in the Jewish faith- is uniquely placed to apply soft pressure on Israel. Unlike many critics of Israel, Starmer simply cannot be accused of being anti-Semitic; to all intents and purposes, his family is Jewish.

It is therefore as frustrating as it is regrettable that Starmer has instead chosen to go down the route of justifying the Israeli extremism.
Well no it isn't really because Hamas do commit terrorist attacks against Israel, it just so happens Israel is a stronger military force.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,522
Location
Taunton or Kent
Totally spot on and i had hoped someone like Lammy who knows this is the correct assessment would reassert that message and whilst unlikely to be able to exert real influence over Israel he could at least engage with other countries to try and build a better consensus at the UN. It would also go down well with a lot of UK nationals. But what do we get is Starmer/Lammy now going backwards from previous movement and just reinforcing that Israel can do what it wants.
Starmer- married to a Jewish woman and raising his children in the Jewish faith- is uniquely placed to apply soft pressure on Israel. Unlike many critics of Israel, Starmer simply cannot be accused of being anti-Semitic; to all intents and purposes, his family is Jewish.

It is therefore as frustrating as it is regrettable that Starmer has instead chosen to go down the route of justifying the Israeli extremism.
The only sensible way out of this seems to be mass continuous peaceful protest in all the countries whose official position is wrong, in an attempt to make them change. If this doesn't work, keep going and make them larger. There are very few government voices in the UK and US who seem capable of gaining traction on the issue.

Something else I thought was interesting is recently Netanyahu tried to address the Iranian people and highlight their leadership was the problem in their lives and called for them to bring it down. In many ways he is correct here. But at the same time, one could easily say the same thing about him in regard to the Israeli people.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,621
Location
Isle of Man
Something else I thought was interesting is recently Netanyahu tried to address the Iranian people and highlight their leadership was the problem in their lives and called for them to bring it down. In many ways he is correct here. But at the same time, one could easily say the same thing about him in regard to the Israeli people.
Netanyahu and his ragtag collection of far-right loons were elected by the Israeli public. Bezalel Smotrich is a illegal settler and his party won 14 seats in the Knesset. So clearly they do not see it the same way at all.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,538
Location
LBK
Not really, Hamas have made it quite clear they want to remove Israel from the map! How does anyone suggest you negotiate with that?
Meanwhile, Israel is actually removing Gaza from the map, physically, with munitions, and killing tens of thousands of the people and children who live there in a genocide. They are also in the process of invading another sovereign state.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The only sensible way out of this seems to be mass continuous peaceful protest in all the countries whose official position is wrong, in an attempt to make them change. If this doesn't work, keep going and make them larger. There are very few government voices in the UK and US who seem capable of gaining traction on the issue.
It’ll take a bit more than peaceful protest to turn the crank here, I fear. It certainly did, when it came to changing our policies in Iraq and Afghanistan.
 

Bungle965

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
2 Jul 2014
Messages
3,384
Location
Calder Valley
You negotiate with the Palestinian Authority and enable them to become the government of the whole of the occupied Palestinian territory.
Sadly the problem here, especially when discussions look to a long term view on Gaza most Western allies of Israel want PA to have a considerable amount of say. Yet they don’t really look in any sort of position to do that, not to mention amount of corruption within it.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,621
Location
Isle of Man
most Western allies of Israel want PA to have a considerable amount of say. Yet they don’t really look in any sort of position to do that, not to mention amount of corruption within it.
I'd agree that the Western allies probably do.

But Israel do not. Letting the Palestinian Authority have control would be a bit too close to letting the people of the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip have autonomy and self-determination.

Which is why Netanyahu and the far right in Israel have been so diligent in sowing discord between the PA and Hamas and why they've been so diligent in making sure Gaza and the West Bank were controlled by different entities.

As for corruption within the Palestinian Authority, I don't think that's ever been a concern of the CIA's before!
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,120
Location
Redcar
Meanwhile, Israel is actually removing Gaza from the map, physically, with munitions, and killing tens of thousands of the people and children who live there in a genocide. They are also in the process of invading another sovereign state.

Quite.

Personally I don't think Hamas could ever be a partner for peace. At least not until there's a full throated renunciation of their founding charter. Article 13 for instance is not a strong starting point for a peace process!

Article Thirteen:​

Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement. Abusing any part of Palestine is abuse directed against part of religion. Nationalism of the Islamic Resistance Movement is part of its religion. Its members have been fed on that. For the sake of hoisting the banner of Allah over their homeland they fight. "Allah will be prominent, but most people do not know."

Now and then the call goes out for the convening of an international conference to look for ways of solving the (Palestinian) question. Some accept, others reject the idea, for this or other reason, with one stipulation or more for consent to convening the conference and participating in it. Knowing the parties constituting the conference, their past and present attitudes towards Moslem problems, the Islamic Resistance Movement does not consider these conferences capable of realising the demands, restoring the rights or doing justice to the oppressed. These conferences are only ways of setting the infidels in the land of the Moslems as arbitraters. When did the infidels do justice to the believers?

"But the Jews will not be pleased with thee, neither the Christians, until thou follow their religion; say, The direction of Allah is the true direction. And verily if thou follow their desires, after the knowledge which hath been given thee, thou shalt find no patron or protector against Allah." (The Cow - verse 120).
There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors. The Palestinian people know better than to consent to having their future, rights and fate toyed with. As in said in the honourable Hadith:

"The people of Syria are Allah's lash in His land. He wreaks His vengeance through them against whomsoever He wishes among His slaves It is unthinkable that those who are double-faced among them should prosper over the faithful. They will certainly die out of grief and desperation."

Neither is the opening preambles choice of opening quotation particularly encouraging!

Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it" (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory).


Of course they softened it a lot in the 2017 revised charter but, personally, I'm not convinced it was anything other than a PR piece. Particularly considering the October 7 attack. I'm not convinced that the attendees at the Nova festival were all "Zionists" (the language used by the new charter rather than "Jews").

But, and I'd hope that that but was obviously coming, Israel, particularly under this Government (but under any Government led by Netanyahu or Likud, just that this one is riddled with extremists from other parties as well) is clearly also not a partner with which any sort of sensible negotiation can take place. You don't get to negotiate anything other than a ceasefire whilst you're in the process of obliterating one of the parties to the negotiation. An equitable peace agreement can only really follow once the shooting is at least paused. The Israeli government clearly has no such interest in such an outcome. It seems clear to me that the Smotrich wing of the Government is in control and is going to try their damndest to drive the Palestinians out of Gaza and if they don't leave, well, I think it's quite clear that the Israeli government intends to make it impossible for them to live there with obvious gruesome consequences.

Just as I don't see how you can negotiate with Hamas, I don't see how you can negotiate with Israel at this time considering it's present conduct and leadership.

Perhaps one of the great what-ifs of history might well be what if an Israeli extremist hadn't managed to assassinate Yitzhak Rabin in 1995 and effectively permanently stall out the Oslo Peace process and helping to set the stage for Netanyahu and Likud to win the 1996 elections. Since when Israel hasn't really had a government which was anything other than pro-Zionist with at best lip service paid to a lasting peace process.
 

DerekC

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2015
Messages
2,442
Location
Hampshire (nearly a Hog)
Perhaps one of the great what-ifs of history might well be what if an Israeli extremist hadn't managed to assassinate Yitzhak Rabin in 1995 and effectively permanently stall out the Oslo Peace process and helping to set the stage for Netanyahu and Likud to win the 1996 elections. Since when Israel hasn't really had a government which was anything other than pro-Zionist with at best lip service paid to a lasting peace process.
Spot on. The problem is that both sides are being led by the religious zealots and the main protagonists (Israel and Iran) are states where religion is part of the founding ethos. And for a zealot, religion is vastly more important than human rights even for their own believers, and all others are (at best) third class. Is there any possibility of breaking out of this apparently never ending cycle of war?

Before Netanyahu there was some hope on the Israeli side, because there are very many Israelis and Jewish people around the world who are not zealots and understand that peace will only ever come through co-operation and negotiation. Netanyahu, in pursuing his own political survival, has made that enormously more difficult and through a process of incompetence and provocation got the Middle East exactly where he wants it - on the brink of a war with Iran in which the US will be drawn in on Israel's side, and with the extra bonus of improving Trump's chances of getting re-elected.

On the Iranian side there is a bit more hope - there is a faint flicker of light in that the religious regime has now failed in every possible way, people are fed up with it, and religion seems to be less deeply embedded than in Israel. Can there be a secular revolution? I don't know but there are some who seem to think so. However even if that happens, it won't solve the problem because the Palestinians (understandably) are never going to give up their demand for a homeland - so Netanyahu has to go too and be replaced by an Israeli moderate with enough popular backing to kick the settlers out - or at least some of them.

Will it happen one day? I still hope so, but I don't expect to see it in what remains of my lifetime.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,032
Location
Surrey
Starmer- married to a Jewish woman and raising his children in the Jewish faith- is uniquely placed to apply soft pressure on Israel. Unlike many critics of Israel, Starmer simply cannot be accused of being anti-Semitic; to all intents and purposes, his family is Jewish.

It is therefore as frustrating as it is regrettable that Starmer has instead chosen to go down the route of justifying the Israeli extremism.
Its not good that being negative about Israel actions automatically make you anti-sematic in the eyes of Netanyahu
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,054
Location
St Albans
Its not good that being negative about Israel actions automatically make you anti-sematic in the eyes of Netanyahu
It's just a very cynical yet effective means of shutting down criticism. The few Jews I know personally regard this as scurrilous and ultimately damaging to their religion's reputation. One day there may be a swing away from the respect that the majority of the faith enjoys.
Interestingly, during an interview with a professor on R4's Today programme yesterday, Likud's slaying of Gaza and maybe Lebanon were described as holocausts. That should seriously concern those that are (so far) proud of their race's history.
 
Last edited:

BigDog

Member
Joined
24 May 2024
Messages
104
Location
Newcastle
It's just a very cynical yet effective means of shutting down criticism. The few Jews I know personally regard this as scurrilous and ultimately damaging to their religion's reputation. One day there may be a swing away from the respect that the majority of the faith enjoys.
Interestingly, during an interview with a professor on R4's Today programme yesterday, Likud's slaying of Gaza and maybe Lebanon wers described as holocausts. That should seriously concern those that are (so far) proud of their race's history.
I suppose they may have a different opinion because they are not in the thick of it and on high alert because of terrorist threats?
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
It's just a very cynical yet effective means of shutting down criticism.
Indeed, but it doesn't make Netanyahu look good. It makes him come across as an autocrat and a demagogue who wants to libel people in order to silence them. "If you protest against us bombing Gazans, you are an anti-Semite".

Why that man has any international friends now is beyond me. The West need to treat him with the utmost of suspicion - he is certainly no friend. He and Likud brought the current trouble on themselves, and Likud and its adoption of violence as a "solution" has done precisely zero for peace in the region. And he's potentially bringing trouble on the West through the risk of terrorist reprisals.

We need a return to good leaders of Israel, like Rabin.
Please, please, please, I know you are a moderator but this is not a game. 10000s people are losing their lives. Potential escalation to WW3. I don’t play games. I am interested in what other people would do.
If you're worried about WW3 one solution would be that the IDF keep the hell out of other people's land and the West refuse to support them until they behave themselves. We should absolutely not be aligning ourselves with this violent, far-right government or excusing their actions; it will do us no good at all.
 
Last edited:

sjpowermac

Established Member
Joined
26 May 2018
Messages
2,079
It is not relevant. What purpose does that question serve, other than to illuminate your point about musing whether it might be a good idea for Israel to colonise more peoples?

In any case, post-apartheid South Africa was not modelled on any of the regional states nearby. Why would that ever have been necessary? Why would Israel need to be modelled on a nearby country? It wouldn't!

Your answers purport to be sensible and reasonable but applied to pre-renewal South Africa in the early 1990s - another state which was completely unpicked and rebuilt into a Mk2 version with the colonisers properly removed from power - they amount to:

"the white colonisers and ethnic cleansers have built this political system, and despite its flaws, such as being built on ethnically-based violence and colonialism, the country is probably the most stable and still certainly the most prosperous on the continent - what if they had the right to extend their prosperous ways to other peoples in the region?" and

"the surrounding nations do not have any history of democracy or proper governance, so it is important that apartheid South Africa serves as a beacon of democracy for the region - we should ignore the fact it is a racist ethnostate". (Note the surrounding nations in this case are all run by black Africans of course, and it is an explicitly racist trope in South Africa to suggests blacks do not have political consciousness or the ability to peacefully organise and build a state - so racist that even most whites do not suggest this now, as it was one of the cornerstone arguments of paternalistic apartheid. Yet here I am listening to someone suggest the same, just for Muslims in the Middle East, as part of their rhetoric justifying Israel's continued violent existence)
OK so I accept that you feel Israel has no right to exist. I think you mentioned in one of your rants that you would include Jewish people in your Israel Mk2. Is that right? If so, how would you propose to protect them?
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,538
Location
LBK
OK so I accept that you feel Israel has no right to exist. I think you mentioned in one of your rants that you would include Jewish people in your Israel Mk2. Is that right? If so, how would you propose to protect them?
I’m really not interested in sealioning. Enjoy the rest of your evening.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,054
Location
St Albans
How damaging it looks for their people, if you are fearful of terrorist attacks that could well may be the last of their concerns?
They do value their ancestral homeland, but are far from impressed with the behaviour of the elected administration. Indeed to the extent of embarassment that it has used the very methods of colonisation by violence that for over 70 years the Jews have have reminded the world should never be allowed to happen again.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,621
Location
Isle of Man
The few Jews I know personally regard this as scurrilous and ultimately damaging to their religion's reputation.
Ultimately it is very damaging.

Likud and the far-right coalition partners have long insisted that there way is the true way and that anyone who disagrees with them is not a “proper Jew”. We see similar discourse here too, look how Michael Rosen repeatedly has people claim he isn’t a “proper Jew” because of his left wing beliefs.

Of course people outside Judaism listen to this, and listen to Likud-aligned lobbyists like Campaign Against Antisemitism, and make the unfair and inaccurate assumption that all Jewish people agree with Likud.

So it’s hardly a surprise that attacks against Jewish people and Jewish property go up when things flare up in Israel. It’s entirely wrong that they do, but it isn’t surprising.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top