• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

0Z93 Leeds FLT to Tees Dock (18/04/26) Query.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Dood75

Member
Joined
8 May 2019
Messages
309
Possibly connected to the previous arrival of 4N93 with 66532 and maybe an issue with the loco for the return working (on Monday I assume)...seems to have lost a bit of time at Darlington...
 

MboroFC

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2025
Messages
266
Location
United Kingdom
Possibly connected to the previous arrival of 4N93 with 66532 and maybe an issue with the loco for the return working (on Monday I assume)...seems to have lost a bit of time at Darlington...
Thanks, that's a good shout. So 4N93 was double headed, 66532, 66510?
 

Dood75

Member
Joined
8 May 2019
Messages
309
No, 4N93 was worked by 66532 but it could have developed an issue en route so a loco (66510 in this case) was/is required to return from Tees Dock with 66532 (or in place of) when it returns
 

55002

Established Member
Joined
16 Aug 2019
Messages
5,429
Location
Ldn
looking at railcam info. It looks like 4M30 Grangemouth to Daventry had an issue at Darlington, 66532 working 4N93 Doncaster to South Bank seems to have been swapped off 4N93 at Darlington, to take over 4M30 down to Bescot and on to Daventry this morning, then light to Lawley St. 66510 then sent light from Leeds as 0Z93, to take over 4N93, but wasn’t needed so ran direct to South Bank..maybe the original 4M30 loco 66513 worked 4N93 forward and 66510 wasn’t needed. It’s a theory!
 
Last edited:

MboroFC

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2025
Messages
266
Location
United Kingdom
Thanks Both

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

No, 4N93 was worked by 66532 but it could have developed an issue en route so a loco (66510 in this case) was/is required to return from Tees Dock with 66532 (or in place of) when it returns
Would i be right in saying that the said return working on Mondays is 4D87? :)
 

55002

Established Member
Joined
16 Aug 2019
Messages
5,429
Location
Ldn
Thanks Both

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Would i be right in saying that the said return working on Mondays is 4D87? :)
Yep both 510 and 513 went back on 4D87
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top