Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Stagecoach Midlands -
X4 used to be Milton Keynes-Peterborough, now Northampton-Peterborough.
X6 Milton Keynes-Leicester, now Northampton-Leicester
(The MK section was replaced by X6, originally at the same half hourly frequency but now operating once an hour)
X46 Northampton-Thrapston, now...
You still haven't listed a proper provocation towards Russia. Various eastern European countries joined NATO (a purely defensive alliance) because they were scared of being invaded by Russia. And for good reason too, Ukraine didn't join NATO and look how it's turned out for them...
I saw a long convoy of Cazoo lorries heading up the A6 today, at least 20 units with some more being carried on trailers. Possibly heading for storage due to this announcement?
Is it any surprise that Netanyahu is trying to spin this to buy more support for his corrupt government? The sooner the far-right is out of government, the sooner some kind of peace can be achieved.
That's interesting. Personally I very much prefer a number to a meaningless name - something like "Link" would be more suited to a high-frequency interurban route, rather than an hourly rural service linking two minor towns.
Stagecoach South's seem strange though - some trunk routes get names, others simply have numbers - some locals have names, others numbers....was there one named route per depot or something? Other operators with named routes - Trentbarton would be the one that immediately comes to mind - at...
I doubt that, for a small urban operator like Safeguard, the £2 scheme would have had much of a significant effect on passenger numbers if they did participate, as most fares would be low to begin with (The article quotes that the maximum fare is £2.50) and the most growth on routes since the £2...
You haven't explained how it won't "work in reality" at all. I'm not a parent myself but it is already a struggle (albeit minor) to make packed lunches for myself, so I alternate between packing a lunch and buying from a shop on weekdays. Obviously option 2 is removed for children. I couldn't...
Even taking the poverty argument out of it, removing the requirement for parents to prepare meals for their children will increase productivity and decrease stress - the long term benefits to the country would be huge. It's only a bad concept to those who can't see past the next election cycle.
I have no problem paying more taxes for things that will have an obvious benefit to society as a whole. It's when taxes rise and the public services appear to be decreasing in value and quality that I would start getting concerned about the amount of spending on "free" things.
I don't think the meals will cost anywhere near £2.75 each - most meals I make for myself cost me less than £2.50 and that's without the economies of scale that will be involved - not to mention that children will be eating significantly smaller portions. Furthermore £5.3bn is absolutely tiny...
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.