Search results

Ah, so they are guilty by association, even though you have no evidence of anything Cameron, Osborne or Johnson did. More of Labour's "sterile rhetoric of class warfare" :-) --- old post above --- --- new post below --- So what specifically did Cameron, Osborne and Johnson actually do?

I've no idea. I know someone got arrested 21 years after Cameron left, because you just told me. Did Cameron, Osborne or Johnson get arrested? Why not - it'd be a cinch to trace them through their college.

Great exposé. Pity this all happened 21 years after Cameron graduated.

Ah, a lovely false dichotomy :-) The real answer is neither.

It was just a general observation.

Quite right. But I'd still rather have Cameron in charge of the country as his own man, making his own mistakes and learning from them, rather than the hypocrite Miliband. Your post genuinely made me go and make a cup of tea.

Happily. As explained above, he's not pretending to be anything else, unlike certain hypocrites I could mention. But I am disappointed that I didn't make you genuinely laugh this time. I must be slipping :-)

Hardly desperate, my evidence is the lack of arrests, or any discipline by the university. What I suspect it was like was just some normal student high-jinks exaggerated by the left to prop up their usual bankrupt class war. Students go drinking - get over it :-) --- old post above --- ---...

Oh no, it's conspiracy season again! Tin-foil hats on chaps :-) You seem to know a lot about the Bullindon Club. If it was as bad as all that, perhaps you can explain why the restaurants accepted the bookings? Why a group of easily identifiable students in fancy dress weren't perused back...

Ah. I assumed Miliband chose to go to Oxford. I didn't realise he had no choice.

So are you saying Cameron's outfit is representative? Did he dress like that all of the time, or was it maybe just for special occasions like Miliband? Of course. The garb of every day working class men everywhere :-)

But Cameron isn't pretending to be anything that he is not. Ed "two kitchens" Miliband sits in his £2m house and pretends to be a man of the people, the champion of the ordinary working man. But then when he tries to act like an ordinary working man, he actually hasn't got the life...

Because this is a man who could, potentially, be representing the country on the world stage. And a man who (despite pretending that he hasn't), has, like every other politician, courted the media for countless photo opportunities. If the future leader of this country becomes a laughing...

Better than bankrupting it so there is "no money left" to do anything :-) If the shareholders are investing, and sharing the risk, then why not?

Some would say that's the free market giving the people what they want, rather than what someone thinks they should want. (But again, not me :-))

Interesting that the Daily Mail, a newspaper run by evil right-wingers, turns a healthy profit (£536m for 2014), whereas the Guardian, run by responsible left-wingers loses £30m a year. I'm sure some people would draw a connection between running a newspaper and running the country, but not...

Ed Miliband has written in the Daily Mail. So anyone who thinks everything in the Daily Mail is rubbish must also think what Miliband said is rubbish :-)

It's an over simplification to say that governments cannot bind their successors, but anyone pausing and thinking would realise that there is nothing to stop a future government repealing it. So not such a big deal for democracy as the scare-mongers would lead you to believe I'm afraid.

I was going to say you can on New Years Eve, but it's labouring the point a bit :-)

The walk from the Victoria line to the new Northern Ticket Hall at Kings Cross is about that far :-)