Mattplans
Member
You could also be pick-pocketed?Yes there is, it's a really, really ill advised thing to do. Your bag could get nicked when you aren't looking.
You could also be pick-pocketed?Yes there is, it's a really, really ill advised thing to do. Your bag could get nicked when you aren't looking.
In which case they have to accept the consequences. Tenants are entitled to get contents only insurance which will still cover lost keys.Lots of people don't have that though - esp if they are not home owners.
No! As ainsworth74 says:I suppose another reason to have one of those key lock safes by your front door with a spare set of keys in it.
They are no better than putting a spare key under the door mat or plant pot. A spare key should be kept by someone you trust. Don't use these unsecure key boxes.Though those are notoriously easy to bypass/pick so I would strongly advise either against it full stop or at least having mounted somewhere inconspicuous.
(Two videos showing a YouTuber known as the "lock picking lawyer" picking two key safes in a matter of seconds.)
It's probably the fact the carriages are on their side on an embankment that's the issue. It might not be possible to safely enter and root about without risking the carriage sliding further down the embankment. Just a thought.
If the carriages can't be secured from moving, how are the recovery team going to work on and in them safely to prepare them for lifting?If the coaches are at risk of slipping then anyone trying to shore them up may also be in an unsafe situation.
Though those are notoriously easy to bypass/pick so I would strongly advise either against it full stop or at least having mounted somewhere inconspicuous.
agreed - but you need to apply the law of sod hereMost students live in shared houses or halls. If it's halls the reception will be able to sort it (they may charge a fee but it won't be hundreds). If a shared house the other residents will, though there may be a need to break into their room but they could kip on the sofa and deal with that the next day.
It's people of more limited means outside of students who may have more of a problem.
These keys are not lost. Their location is known. The owner is being prevented from accessing them.Appropriate insurance against the loss of house/flat keys isn't travel insurance, it's home insurance.
You could also be pick-pocketed?
Indeed they are. Probably depends on ones attitude to risk....In which case they have to accept the consequences. Tenants are entitled to get contents only insurance which will still cover lost keys.
While not the case here, there are people - myself included - with passports that are literally irreplaceable due to political circumstances back home.And he acknowledges in the BBC piece that he could get back to Norway with an emergency passport.
These keys are not lost. Their location is known. The owner is being prevented from accessing them.
While not the case here, there are people - myself included - with passports that are literally irreplaceable due to political circumstances back home.
But their location might not be known.These keys are not lost. Their location is known. The owner is being prevented from accessing them.
The idea you shouldn't put a passport in a bag is madness. Nobody I know in the "very frequent traveller" sphere would carry it on their person in a pocket.
I spent about 5 years living and/or working abroad at various times during my working life and my passport spent nearly all its time in a pocket during these periods. In a lot of countries you are required to carry some form of identification with you and it was the simplest way to make sure this happened.The idea you shouldn't put a passport in a bag is madness. Nobody I know in the "very frequent traveller" sphere would carry it on their person in a pocket. This is just backwards engineering an objection to someone quoted in the news - not unreasonably - saying it's annoying their passport is being retained by the railway in a totally novel set of circumstances none of us could possibly foresee.
Anything can get nicked when you're not looking. Where are your passport and keys at the moment? I'll bet they're not both on your person.Yes there is, it's a really, really ill advised thing to do. Your bag could get nicked when you aren't looking.
I have a spare key shallowly buried in the garden, which I have had to use although when I've forgotten my keys rather than lost them.They are no better than putting a spare key under the door mat or plant pot. A spare key should be kept by someone you trust. Don't use these unsecure key boxes.
Anything can get nicked when you're not looking. Where are your passport and keys at the moment? I'll bet they're not both on your person.
You're right that caution and preparedness is in general a good thing, but dear me this thread is dripping in sanctimony!
I have a spare key shallowly buried in the garden, which I have had to use although when I've forgotten my keys rather than lost them.
A lot of people would consider the risk of being pickpocketed or losing the passport from a pocket much higher than if it is in a secret pocket in your bag, which is in sight or worn at all times. If you wear cargo pants all the time it's an option but I'm not sitting on and bending my passport in my bum pocket for ten hours and most people probably wouldn't either.Is it? I'm just a bit flabbergasted that it isn't the norm to put these very valuably and hard to replace items on your person while out of the house!
A lot of people would consider the risk of being pickpocketed or losing the passport from a pocket much higher than if it is in a secret pocket in your bag, which is in sight or worn at all times.
If you wear cargo pants all the time it's an option but I'm not sitting on and bending my passport in my bum pocket for ten hours and most people probably wouldn't either.
The buried lede to this story is now it is more likely people will take their belongings with them when evacuating the train. If he'd left with his rucksack nobody would have batted an eyelid. Many passengers were pictured leaving the train with bags.Surely the student could bill the emergency passport and a locksmith+key cutting to GTR/NR? The laptop with work on is more of an issue, granted.
Also I'm not a railway/HSE worker but it seems odd to me that if people were in and standing on the side of the train for the best part of an hour, why can it not just be signed off that a worker can go in and retrieve any belongings...
this was my first thought. The railway loves to rigidly stick to its own rules though, and customer satisfaction often appears to be their last priority.Also I'm not a railway/HSE worker but it seems odd to me that if people were in and standing on the side of the train for the best part of an hour, why can it not just be signed off that a worker can go in and retrieve any belongings...
Sadly we live in a blame culture. The issue might not have been caused by the railway; we'll have to wait for the official RAIB report for that.There is a lot of victim blaming in this thread. The issue was caused by the railway, so they should be the ones putting it right in a reasonable timeframe.
The inability to reunite people with their belongings in a reasonable time is however being caused by the railway...Sadly we live in a blame culture. The issue might not have been caused by the railway; we'll have to wait for the official RAIB report for that.
I often have my phone in my back pocket because it doesn't fit in any of my other pockets. Granted when walking around a city I'll likely move it to my bag.I never use my back pockets, they are like an open invitation to pickpockets and it amazes me how many people you see walking down the street with obvious wallets and expensive phones sticking out of these, not to mention the faff of having to take the item out before sitting.
Imo this is a pretty important trust issue. If passengers don't trust their important belongings will be returned to them I can't say I blame them for ignoring the "leave your belongings behind" advice.
Would be a huge help if a passport was the size of a credit card, and you could have a spare.I spent about 5 years living and/or working abroad at various times during my working life and my passport spent nearly all its time in a pocket during these periods. In a lot of countries you are required to carry some form of identification with you and it was the simplest way to make sure this happened.
The ordinary consequence of belongings not returned in this circumstance, e.g. genuinely destroyed by a fire in a train carriage, would be that you'd hire a locksmith to come and replace all of your locks. That could run you up a couple of grand.In which case they have to accept the consequences. Tenants are entitled to get contents only insurance which will still cover lost keys.
I suspect the person is a private tenant. Landlord would have keys. Might even be prevented from changing locks without landlord agreeing.The ordinary consequence of belongings not returned in this circumstance, e.g. genuinely destroyed by a fire in a train carriage, would be that you'd hire a locksmith to come and replace all of your locks. That could run you up a couple of grand.
It probably wouldn't be covered by your home insurer regardless, as they'd expect you to claim the cost of the locksmith from the railway company. Depends on the wording of your policy, the totality of your losses and the attitude towards customer service which your insurer shows. They may cover your unavoidable expenses in the short term for you and then seek to have these recovered from the railway company, or their insurer, as part of any settlement. It also depends on if anyone might be entitled to personal injury compensation from GTR.
One of the reasons why every effort is usually made to return items, in addition to PR and compassion for anything that has been saved which is of sentimental value, is that timely returns minimise liability.
I meant as a general matter of principle, any number expensive losses of baggage in serious collisions are a possibility.I suspect the person is a private tenant. Landlord would have keys. Might even be prevented from changing locks without landlord agreeing.