Jon_jpwh
Member
The letter seems just a repeat of his broadcast when he announced his resignation as an MP. I certainly don't believe his claim that Labour have friends in the media.
Farage and his party are keen wherever they can, to ensure their existing supporters feel endlessly betrayed and the victim of everything that fails to make them ever-happy. Farage know only too well what he's doing. Blaming everyone else for the very things that he himself is guilty of is just standard practice for creating deflection. Trumpism - demonstrably so.Pulling the victim card is his only genuine skill barring being a pot-stirring grifter.
Quite! Mirror & Guardian aside, Starmer was Billy-no-mates from day 1 in the job.I certainly don't believe his claim that Labour have friends in the media.
What a moaning Myrtle he is. Total victim as usual.This letter has been going out to residents in Clacton area.
Sorry can't do a quote as it's a photo.
Precisely. It's all rooted back to the oldest populist trick in the book. The rest of us, outside the cult of personality, can see it for what it is and either vehemently oppose it or let it run rampant if it benefits it us in some way.Farage and his party are keen wherever they can, to ensure their existing supporters feel endlessly betrayed and the victim of everything that fails to make them ever-happy. Farage know only too well what he's doing. Blaming everyone else for the very things that he himself is guilty of is just standard practice for creating deflection. Trumpism - demonstrably so.
Without even reading it, my first thought was the same as when he called the by-election to start with: 'Poor me, pour me another drink'. Eyes rolled back so far they nearly fell out my head.What a moaning Myrtle he is. Total victim as usual.
It's a load of utter tripe. If he had faced even a silver of the scrutiny that Starmer had to, he would've literally self-combusted by now.The letter seems just a repeat of his broadcast when he announced his resignation as an MP. I certainly don't believe his claim that Labour have friends in the media.
The convicted fraudster George Cottrell transferred a total of more than $2m to his mother, Fiona Cottrell, in the days before her 2024 donations to Reform UK, the Guardian understands.
Financial industry sources told the Guardian that Fiona received one deposit of $1.4m and two tranches of more than $300,000 each – money she attributed to having come from her son, George, when bankers asked about the deposits.
On each occasion, the Guardian understands transfers were made 24-72 hours before Fiona made a donation either directly to Reform, or via Britain Means Business, a fundraising vehicle for the political party.
According to sources, the lump sums went through US-based cryptocurrency exchanges before entering Fiona’s account. These platforms allow crypto-assets to be changed for hard currency, such as US dollars or British pounds. Some were routed to Fiona via money exchange services.
The Metropolitan police are investigating the funding of Reform UK, with a focus on scrutinising whether there were attempts to disguise the ultimate source of donations.
The new disclosures will add to the questions facing Reform and its leader, Nigel Farage, whose finances have been under the spotlight since the Guardian revealed he received a £5m gift from the crypto-billionaire Christopher Harborne.
Fiona was one of the most important donors to the party in 2024, making secret as well as public donations. She gave two lots of £250,000 in May 2024, which were disclosed transparently to the Electoral Commission. It can be revealed that these donations were preceded by transfers of $318,878 and $328,815 from her son.
As first revealed by the Guardian, she also gave more than £1m to Britain Means Business, a company controlled by the party’s deputy leader, Richard Tice, in June 2024. That cash transfer was not declared officially at the time, and was routed via the bank account of Oneify, an Australian money exchange service. Half that sum was transferred directly to the party days later by Tice, with no declaration that it originated from Fiona Cottrell.
It can now be revealed that sources have told the Guardian that $1,400,000 was deposited into Fiona Cottrell’s account by her son before she gave the £1,075,000 to Britain Means Business on 10 June 2024, just weeks before the general election.
In total, George Cottrell deposited $2,047,693 into his mother’s account, the Guardian has been told. Taking into account her 2024 donations to Britain Means Business and Reform UK, Fiona gave a total of £1.5m that year. These amounts are roughly equivalent, based on exchange rate data from May and June 2024.
Two Reform UK sources who were involved in party fundraising before the 2024 vote told the Guardian that George had assured senior party figures that some money would be on its way into the party’s coffers in the weeks leading up to the vote.
“He was acting as a sort of shadow treasurer, saying he would find a way to get more money in,” one of the sources said.
Asked about the transfers, lawyers for George Cottrell said their client had no further comment.
In previous legal correspondence, George has not denied giving his mother – who is understood to be of relatively modest means – large sums of money. Instead, he said via lawyers that “any political donations his mother has made have been entirely her own decision, and are a matter for her”.
Fiona Cottrell has not responded to several attempts by the Guardian to contact her.
I'd say it's the former. Reform is so devoid of any actual policies that it cannot possibly be described as a political party. It is however very good at attracting investment it seems.SO, is reform a company, mascaraing as a political party, or a political party, that seems to be a company?
Whatever it is, it seems very dodgy, that someone convicted of fraud, and because of it, is barred from making large donations to a party, that isn't, has to use his mother as a front person, isn't that money laundering, because there's no clear line of the origin of the funds, so who gave a convicted fraudster such a large sum of money in the first place?
I do like the fact that he's always accountable, is that a misprint in that he actually has lot of accounts with which to hide money because with his current money scandal and his rare visits to Clacton, accountable to the people of Clacton he is not!Part of the cover of the Frinton and Walton Gazette this week.
"But even before it began, he knew that this visit to the Clacton peninsula will be a fleeting one as he lives in perpetual fear of coming into prolonged contact with, as he sees them, the great unwashed that consistute the general public who will likely see him for what he truly is under the cheap suit, thus he will scurry back to his den of cheap cigar smoke and wine-soaked debauchery at the earliest opportunity"Also maybe they could get David Attenborough to narrate his visit to Clacton,
"Now this is one of the rarest sightings I've ever seen, the Nigel Faragius Brexidus is rarely seen in this part of the country, normally more likely to be seen in a posh London members club, but here he is out in the wild.
Farage was elected to serve a full term, so stepping down and standing again isn't really serving the interests of Clacton either. Fair enough if he had health or personal reasons to resign, but trying to forestall an investigation isn't a good justification especially as the investigation re-starts if he is re-elected.Whichever comedian wins this by-election it will just show the sad state of the public view of politics.
Whilst I understand the reasons the other parties not running, it also demonstrates the lack of interest from these parties to the people of Clacton and how democracy works.
If it is the lowest turnout ever the winner could be elected with a single figure percentage of the local electorate. Madness
I think that was clear from the beginning, he only has self interests.Farage was elected to serve a full term, so stepping down and standing again isn't really serving the interests of Clacton either.
Although this was a Supplementary Vote so I suspect most of the Restore votes ticked Reform as 2nd choice (the Reform candidate gained 45,250 in the second round).Interesting to note in the first preference votes for the Manchester Mayor:
Reform. 111928
Restore. 46289
Restore doing in turn to Reform, what Reform has done to the Tories?
I think that Sir Lindsay will tell him, in his rich Chorley accent, to take his bin off his head.If only Binface could win, would he be aloud to wear that in parliament? That would really make the rest of the world press have a field day.
Wasn't really an issue that caused Reform to lose last night because the first preference vote for Labour was vastly higher than the Reform, Restore and Even the Tory vote put together.Interesting to note in the first preference votes for the Manchester Mayor:
Reform. 111928
Restore. 46289
Restore doing in turn to Reform, what Reform has done to the Tories?
Can’t have the dear leader lose after his ‘wow is me’ flounce.activists are being encouraged to spend their time in Clacton campaigning against a guy that goes round dressed as a bin instead.
I don’t think it does. They are respecting the result of the last general election, at which the people of Clacton elected an MP to serve a full term until the next general election, not until that person threw a hissy fit.Whilst I understand the reasons the other parties not running, it also demonstrates the lack of interest from these parties to the people of Clacton and how democracy works.
Companies are used for lots of things, so why is it an issue that Reform is constituted this way? Genuine question please, I'm not defending Reform.SO, is reform a company, mascaraing as a political party, or a political party, that seems to be a company?
The leader has much tighter control of the party in "company" form than in a typical party form; they certainly can't be ousted in the conventional manner. While I can't say for sure, I wouldn't be surprised if there is some sort of loophole that can be exploited financially as well by having it as a company.Companies are used for lots of things, so why is it an issue that Reform is constituted this way? Genuine question please, I'm not defending Reform.
NF will surely come out (not like that, behave)
There’s some interesting stereotyping going on there. Reform have had an openly gay deputy leader/chairman (David Bull) and currently have a gay man on their board elected by the membership (Darren Grimes).I think if anyone within Reform did (not that I'm suggesting anything) then it's likely that Reform would lose a lot of support from the "I'm wanting life like it was in the 50's" or "family values" voting former Tories (anyone else remember his that worked out due the Tories?).
Although given that Grinder melts down when the Republicans have a conference, it may not be that far fetched if there were people inside Reform saying things against LGBT+ whist being within that camp (again not suggesting anything about anyone).
Let's not pretend that most Reformers are tolerant of gay culture; one of the first things that many of their newly elected councils did was ban Pride Month posters and advertising in libraries, take down rainbow flags, cut any funding that existed etc.There’s some interesting stereotyping going on there. Reform have had an openly gay deputy leader/chairman (David Bull) and currently have a gay man on their board elected by the membership (Darren Grimes).
I could imagine the majority of people don't care that much that about how other people live their lives,Let's not pretend that most Reformers are tolerant of gay culture; one of the first things that many of their newly elected councils did was ban Pride Month posters and advertising in libraries, take down rainbow flags, cut any funding that existed etc.
One of them (I forget which) insinuated that they were doing it to "protect children".
Dragging all the activists down there makes it look like he is worried that he might not do as well as hoped. I don't think any credible poll has Nigel Losing in Clacton.Can’t have the dear leader lose after his ‘wow is me’ flounce.
Perhaps, although at least in the things I see my local Reform Branch saying online it all has an air of "he's alright for one of those" to it. In the way that suggests to me they would prefer it if it wasn't someone Gay.There’s some interesting stereotyping going on there. Reform have had an openly gay deputy leader/chairman (David Bull) and currently have a gay man on their board elected by the membership (Darren Grimes).