erikvd28
Member
Are there plans to close Berry Brow crossing?
Interesting detail in the link. So ETCS will not be implemented on the immediate approaches to Leeds station itself - that will still be lineside signals. Hence increasing the speed from Leeds to Marsh Lane gives a reduction in headway.This thread has the approximate phasing (caveats about timescales noted):
ETCS Rollout on Transpennine Route Upgrade
Hi all, Recently just got the results back from an FOI from Network Rail about the specifics and timelines for ETCS rollout across the TRU. Thought it might be of interest to some! https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ertms_timeline_and_data_as_part It includes a map of where ETCS will be...www.railforums.co.uk
This is a screenshot (08:01) of a PWI presentation on TRU dated 27 Sept 2024 hosted on YouTube:The line around Neville Hill is being realigned for a higher speed. From Marsh Lane to Neville Hill the linespeed is being increased by 20mph. Some of the bridges between Marsh Lane and Leeds station are being replaced to enable faster speeds as well. Quite how this translates to improved capacity I don't know - I presume that improving linespeed on approaches to busy stations gives you a fair bit of capacity improvement as you clear the signal sections quicker and can reduce headways. Even a 30 second reduction would count for quite a lot. Then there's the ETCS signalling as well.

Scheme E2,3,4 (basically Leeds- Church Fenton) has the following benefit I forgot about.
This scheme enables the closure of multiple level crossings
Not as far as I believe, no. I don't believe it's on the main Huddersfield-Leeds corridor, so it probably won't.Are there plans to close Berry Brow crossing?
Copmanthorpe's been through the mill a bit IIRC; the original plan to replace the crossing with a stepped footbridge met with a few complaints about accessibility. The first attached PDF is what was originally proposed, the second concerns the council's objections to the dedicated TWAO.I believe the programme included closure of them all, but that Copmanthorpe is still outstanding.
Am I correct with 7 mainly UWC?Scheme E2,3,4 (basically Leeds- Church Fenton) has the following benefit I forgot about.
This scheme enables the closure of multiple level crossings
Just to clarify that you mean Berry Brow near Manchester. Between Ashton-under-lyne and Manchester victoria. Which is nowhere near Berry Brow station, near Huddersfied.Are there plans to close Berry Brow crossing?
TfL research shows that at 12 minute frequency (5 services an hour) people perceive a service as truly 'turn up and go'. In other words that don't worry about any timetable and simply rely on the service.40 miles in 41 minutes puts it on a par with journey times with Basingstoke to Waterloo (the fastest do 45 miles in 42 minutes - yes that's sightly faster but it only stops at Woking, those which also stop at Clapham Junction take around 47 minutes).
Indeed, in public transport modeling the rough guide is that people will generally factor 1/2 the frequency as the "delay" that they will encounter by using a service - they might not ever suffer that "delay" but it's a factor and quite significant in how long they feel a journey is.
That means that on an hourly service 30 minutes of "delay", so if the traveling time is 50 minutes, the total perceived journey is 80 minutes.
If you reduce the journey by 10 minutes, you're still taking of the total being 70 minutes.
If you increase frequency to 2tph the "delay" reduces to 15 minutes and so the total (without journey time improvements) becomes 65 minutes.
Also improve the journey time by 10 minutes and the total is 55 minutes.
The one complication in that is that if you can get to 3tph or better than usage significantly improves as timetables become slightly irrelevant as people will start to just turn up for the next service as the delay of only just missing a service becomes small enough to be fairly insignificant.
Obviously, whilst that starts at 3tph, the more frequent the better as more people will be willing to just turn up.
Yes the one near Ashton under LyneJust to clarify that you mean Berry Brow near Manchester. Between Ashton-under-lyne and Manchester victoria. Which is nowhere near Berry Brow station, near Huddersfied.
The line speed increases on this line were done several years ago. I think some footpath level crossings were removed.
Are there plans to close Berry Brow crossing?
Just to clarify that you mean Berry Brow near Manchester. Between Ashton-under-lyne and Manchester victoria. Which is nowhere near Berry Brow station, near Huddersfied.
The line speed increases on this line were done several years ago. I think some footpath level crossings were removed.
This is the one at Clayton Bridge. I didn't know it as Berry Brow.Yes the one near Ashton under Lyne
I wonder if the limit could be upped to 90 on the Chat Moss section or will works be required Ashley crossing being replaced with a bridge would allow the 60 limit to be removed.I've never known it to be much of an issue. If TRU wanted an easy win on the NW side they should look at Astley Level crossing on the Chat Moss. Again it was broken yesterday causing horrendous delays for trains going hundreds of miles away
Much of the Chat Moss is 60mph due to the 'Moss', i.e. ground conditions.I wonder if the limit could be upped to 90 on the Chat Moss section or will works be required Ashley crossing being replaced with a bridge would allow the 60 limit to be removed.
Thought it was something to do with that but it’s 75 not 60, 60 is only for the crossing itself.Much of the Chat Moss is 60mph due to the 'Moss', i.e. ground conditions.
It's 90 west of Astley, 60 at Astley itself, then 75 towards Manchester.Thought it was something to do with that but it’s 75 not 60, 60 is only for the crossing itself.
It's very thin.....I have added some photos of the now open new footbridge at Huddersfield station
https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/Days-out/2026/June-2026/Carlisle/i-vfsjQ7R/A
https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/Days-out/2026/June-2026/Carlisle/i-HpkBCnN/A
https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/Days-out/2026/June-2026/Carlisle/i-zZKqPJd/A
Neil
I do like the design. Nice and airy with loads of natural daylight but sheltered.I have added some photos of the now open new footbridge at Huddersfield station
https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/Days-out/2026/June-2026/Carlisle/i-vfsjQ7R/A
https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/Days-out/2026/June-2026/Carlisle/i-HpkBCnN/A
https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/Days-out/2026/June-2026/Carlisle/i-zZKqPJd/A
Neil
It's very thin.....

Yes it is but the subway will still be the main route to the other parts of the station when reopened.It's very thin.....
Don't forget this is in addition to the extended subway![]()
Ah, ok then.Yes it is but the subway will still be the main route to the other parts of the station when reopened.
I have added some photos of the now open new footbridge at Huddersfield station
https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/Days-out/2026/June-2026/Carlisle/i-vfsjQ7R/A
https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/Days-out/2026/June-2026/Carlisle/i-HpkBCnN/A
https://railway-photography.smugmug.com/Days-out/2026/June-2026/Carlisle/i-zZKqPJd/A
Neil
That's what I thought, but apparently it'll be ok. That aside, I don't get it. What's with the zigzag windows, what does it add other than to annoy the cleaners, and a bigger price tag.Looks quite narrow, or is it just my wrong impression?
Does anyone think there is a risk of people lurking in the angled bits, not visible to anyone starting to cross the bridge?The window design looks nice. I'm pleased that it isn't a plain box, cost cut to oblivion!
Tim's video shows the inside off wellDoes anyone think there is a risk of people lurking in the angled bits, not visible to anyone starting to cross the bridge?
It means that kids watching trains don't get in the way of the main people flow.That's what I thought, but apparently it'll be ok. That aside, I don't get it. What's with the zigzag windows, what does it add other than to annoy the cleaners, and a bigger price tag.