• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Transpennine Route Upgrade and Electrification updates

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,830
This thread has the approximate phasing (caveats about timescales noted):
Interesting detail in the link. So ETCS will not be implemented on the immediate approaches to Leeds station itself - that will still be lineside signals. Hence increasing the speed from Leeds to Marsh Lane gives a reduction in headway.
 

Ian Hardy

Member
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
445
The line around Neville Hill is being realigned for a higher speed. From Marsh Lane to Neville Hill the linespeed is being increased by 20mph. Some of the bridges between Marsh Lane and Leeds station are being replaced to enable faster speeds as well. Quite how this translates to improved capacity I don't know - I presume that improving linespeed on approaches to busy stations gives you a fair bit of capacity improvement as you clear the signal sections quicker and can reduce headways. Even a 30 second reduction would count for quite a lot. Then there's the ETCS signalling as well.
This is a screenshot (08:01) of a PWI presentation on TRU dated 27 Sept 2024 hosted on YouTube:

The graph shows that at 15mph it takes a train 4 minutes to do one mile, at 30 mph it only takes a train 2 minutes to do one mile, so increasing the speed limit by 15mph cuts the journey time in half, which is why the small speed increases improves capacity a lot more than higher speed limit increases.

1780343400511.png
 

IanXC

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
6,609
Scheme E2,3,4 (basically Leeds- Church Fenton) has the following benefit I forgot about.

This scheme enables the closure of multiple level crossings

I believe the programme included closure of them all, but that Copmanthorpe is still outstanding.
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,853
Location
Beeston (Notts)
Are there plans to close Berry Brow crossing?
Not as far as I believe, no. I don't believe it's on the main Huddersfield-Leeds corridor, so it probably won't.
I believe the programme included closure of them all, but that Copmanthorpe is still outstanding.
Copmanthorpe's been through the mill a bit IIRC; the original plan to replace the crossing with a stepped footbridge met with a few complaints about accessibility. The first attached PDF is what was originally proposed, the second concerns the council's objections to the dedicated TWAO.

The TWAO: https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...rks-act-order#full-publication-update-history
And a Beeb link to the plans being dropped: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-67618683
 

Attachments

  • 22_01988_PAP18-PROPOSED_PLAN_AND_ELEVATIONS-2520824.pdf
    3.2 MB · Views: 56
  • inq-07_city_of_york_council_opening.pdf
    117.4 KB · Views: 21

Tim_UK

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2019
Messages
223
Are there plans to close Berry Brow crossing?
Just to clarify that you mean Berry Brow near Manchester. Between Ashton-under-lyne and Manchester victoria. Which is nowhere near Berry Brow station, near Huddersfied.

The line speed increases on this line were done several years ago. I think some footpath level crossings were removed.
 

fat_boy_pete

Member
Joined
16 Mar 2015
Messages
355
Location
Essex
40 miles in 41 minutes puts it on a par with journey times with Basingstoke to Waterloo (the fastest do 45 miles in 42 minutes - yes that's sightly faster but it only stops at Woking, those which also stop at Clapham Junction take around 47 minutes).



Indeed, in public transport modeling the rough guide is that people will generally factor 1/2 the frequency as the "delay" that they will encounter by using a service - they might not ever suffer that "delay" but it's a factor and quite significant in how long they feel a journey is.

That means that on an hourly service 30 minutes of "delay", so if the traveling time is 50 minutes, the total perceived journey is 80 minutes.

If you reduce the journey by 10 minutes, you're still taking of the total being 70 minutes.

If you increase frequency to 2tph the "delay" reduces to 15 minutes and so the total (without journey time improvements) becomes 65 minutes.

Also improve the journey time by 10 minutes and the total is 55 minutes.

The one complication in that is that if you can get to 3tph or better than usage significantly improves as timetables become slightly irrelevant as people will start to just turn up for the next service as the delay of only just missing a service becomes small enough to be fairly insignificant.

Obviously, whilst that starts at 3tph, the more frequent the better as more people will be willing to just turn up.
TfL research shows that at 12 minute frequency (5 services an hour) people perceive a service as truly 'turn up and go'. In other words that don't worry about any timetable and simply rely on the service.
 

erikvd28

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2025
Messages
41
Location
Netherlands
Just to clarify that you mean Berry Brow near Manchester. Between Ashton-under-lyne and Manchester victoria. Which is nowhere near Berry Brow station, near Huddersfied.

The line speed increases on this line were done several years ago. I think some footpath level crossings were removed.
Yes the one near Ashton under Lyne
 

nr758123

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2014
Messages
638
Location
West Yorkshire
Are there plans to close Berry Brow crossing?

Just to clarify that you mean Berry Brow near Manchester. Between Ashton-under-lyne and Manchester victoria. Which is nowhere near Berry Brow station, near Huddersfied.

The line speed increases on this line were done several years ago. I think some footpath level crossings were removed.

Yes the one near Ashton under Lyne
This is the one at Clayton Bridge. I didn't know it as Berry Brow.

As I recall, it's on a steep hill where replacing it with a road bridge would not be practicable. Were it to be closed to traffic, any alternative road route would be several miles.
 

Geeves

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2009
Messages
2,615
Location
Rochdale
I've never known it to be much of an issue. If TRU wanted an easy win on the NW side they should look at Astley Level crossing on the Chat Moss. Again it was broken yesterday causing horrendous delays for trains going hundreds of miles away
 

darylyates17

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2015
Messages
481
Location
St Helens
I've never known it to be much of an issue. If TRU wanted an easy win on the NW side they should look at Astley Level crossing on the Chat Moss. Again it was broken yesterday causing horrendous delays for trains going hundreds of miles away
I wonder if the limit could be upped to 90 on the Chat Moss section or will works be required Ashley crossing being replaced with a bridge would allow the 60 limit to be removed.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,661
I wonder if the limit could be upped to 90 on the Chat Moss section or will works be required Ashley crossing being replaced with a bridge would allow the 60 limit to be removed.
Much of the Chat Moss is 60mph due to the 'Moss', i.e. ground conditions.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,897
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Thought it was something to do with that but it’s 75 not 60, 60 is only for the crossing itself.
It's 90 west of Astley, 60 at Astley itself, then 75 towards Manchester.
In the old days it was 75 generally, with 60 over an extended section between Astley and the M60 bridge.
 

Geeves

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2009
Messages
2,615
Location
Rochdale
Same as others I was under the impression the slower speed was purely down to the crossing, is there a bit of a curve in the western direction too so you don't see the crossing till later?
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
10,457
Location
Preston Lancs

josh-j

Member
Joined
14 Sep 2013
Messages
319
The window design looks nice. I'm pleased that it isn't a plain box, cost cut to oblivion!
 

neil65

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2022
Messages
512
Location
Huddersfield, Kirklees, United Kingdom
A few more photos from the new footbridge at Huddersfield showing the new views that have been opened up which were impossible in the past
The footbridge has opened up a lot of new views which were impossible in the past, view facing East
view facing the old Warehouse and the new platforms still being built

Neil
 

Tim_UK

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2019
Messages
223
That's what I thought, but apparently it'll be ok. That aside, I don't get it. What's with the zigzag windows, what does it add other than to annoy the cleaners, and a bigger price tag.
It means that kids watching trains don't get in the way of the main people flow.
 

Top