• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Recent content by Pure BR

  1. P

    GWR Class 800

    Still need to train up drivers/maintenance and on board staff. All takes lots of time.
  2. P

    GWR Class 800

    Pathetic response. --- old post above --- --- new post below --- Bloody hilarious!! --- old post above --- --- new post below --- I'm sure Chiltern would beg to differ. Do you all work for the DfT or something?!?!?
  3. P

    GWR Class 800

    Arrggh. A journey to Penzance with a noisy, vibrating Diesel engine strapped beneath my carriage. Couldn't think of anything worse. FGW may well not get the go-ahead for the AT 300s anyhow. Put an engine on the end of the carriages where it is supposed to be on akng distance intercity service...
  4. P

    West Coast Signalling Problems

    Is it me, but since the Watford 'upgrade', there have been more signalling delays south of Berkhamsted then ever before!
  5. P

    LM 350 Condition

    Thank you :-)
  6. P

    LM 350 Condition

    Aluminium in its purest form will dissolve when exposed to water. It is treated with aluminium oxide to stop this process. So can only imagine something has gone with the weld?
  7. P

    LM 350 Condition

    Just getting on a 350 at Euston, and was quite shocked at the amount of rust coming through at the cant rail level. Virtually along the whole of the carriage. German engineering eh?!
  8. P

    IEP - Hitatchi making good out of a bad spec?

    Just received Roger Ford's email 'informed sources'. GW IEP, £64000 per diagrammed train per month. Jesus! And no restaurant car for that cash? Progress. I bet Hitachi are rubbing their financial hands with glee! 27.5 years ain't a bad result with that amount of money coming in. No doubt the...
  9. P

    IEP - Hitatchi making good out of a bad spec?

    Yes, Network Rail use the Mark 5 dimensions as a profile for their tracks design. Also we would have had 155 mph trains running back in 1995, using the mark 5 and class 93 loco. But as normal, the Government wouldn't stump the cash up. But loves lavishly tax payers cash on foreign train builders...
  10. P

    IEP - Hitatchi making good out of a bad spec?

    Maybe we should of built some MK5 carriages a stick a loco on. No stupid underfloor engines. Just nice quiet, comfortable carriages. The 390 was a train that forgot about the passenger environment. The Hitachi train is a shocking train. And bloody expensive!!!!
  11. P

    Should we have DOO?

    No we should not.
  12. P

    Class 377/7

    Just experienced the new 377s on the MK to Clapham route. Beats the Siemens product hands down. A lot quieter, air con that doesn't blow your ears out (or bang in and out at a neutral section), much better ambiance and bogies that don't rattle around. Well done Derby!
  13. P

    IEP - Hitatchi making good out of a bad spec?

    What an utterly brilliant statement
  14. P

    East Coast IEPs Ordered - Class 800

    Remember, First Group own 6 HST sets outright. No leasing charges on them.
  15. P

    East Coast IEPs Ordered - Class 800

    I rather suspect that Hitachi were always going to get the deal on East Coast. The Department for Idiots would of given them the nod ages ago so that Hitachi could justify and would 'invest' (very loose term) in the flat-packed making factory at Newton wherever it is.

Top