• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Feet On Seats?

Status
Not open for further replies.

reb0118

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
28 Jan 2010
Messages
3,580
Location
Bo'ness, West Lothian
Does the forum think it acceptable to put your feat on the seats when you have taken your shoes off beforehand? No smelly feet jokes please:oops:.

What if they have no socks on is that just as bad as shoes?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,089
Location
Redcar
Just socks I don't think is an issue (as long as you're feet don't kill everything within a ten foot radius ;)) and I don't think just feet is an issue either (as long as their not walking around barefoot because then I would say it's just as bad as shoes). Personally I tend to put a newspaper down and then keep my shoes on but use the newspaper to protect the seat.
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
No. I'm opposed to taking your shoes off. Socks are sweaty and its not too different from shoes on seats.
 

First class

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2008
Messages
2,731
No! Indeed some TOCs will prosecute you even if you just have your feet (bare or not) on the metal framework.

(Now, as for the sleeper train, well I hope the bedding is fresh!)
 

CosherB

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2007
Messages
3,041
Location
Northwich
I think shoes-off it's fine. I love 1st in a Pendo (or Mk3 before that) to get a single pair of seats each side of a table, recline both, shoes off and feet up on the cushion of the opposite seat. Very comfy!
 

Matt Taylor

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2008
Messages
2,362
Location
Portsmouth
Shoes off is fine by me, also acceptable is placing a newspaper on the seat and having feet on the paper rather than the seat fabric.
 

Bellwater

Member
Joined
10 Jan 2010
Messages
522
Location
on a 158
No. I've threatened to charge people for another fare if their feet are occupying a seat, they soon move them.
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
I don't mind socks on seats, or covering the seat before putting shoes on them. Guards around here are usually quite good for telling people to get feet off seats.
 

Dr.iver

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2011
Messages
62
It's a digesting habit, I always tell people to remove them when changing ends or pass, I've been known to make snooty PA notices if it's when and loads of people have them on the seat.
People have no consideration for others at times
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
What's the difference between someone's sweaty socks and their shoes? Don't try and tell me their feet aren't sweaty - that's rubbish.

You're not at home in front of the fire, keep your shoes on ffs
 

Class172

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
3,892
Location
West Country
Slightly ironic how on the new LM 172s, when the 'please keep your feet off the seats' announcement comes on, people deliberately seem to put them on. :roll:
 

Stigy

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2009
Messages
4,964
I find it strange that some people are so obsessive and absolutely MUST have their feet on the seats, that they go to extra measures such as taking their shoes and socks off....
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
No! Indeed some TOCs will prosecute you even if you just have your feet (bare or not) on the metal framework.

(Now, as for the sleeper train, well I hope the bedding is fresh!)
They'd be hard pushed to win at court if shoes and/or socks were off, bearing in mind the byelaw to be used indicates that there's the likelihood of the feet soiling the seats in laymans terms.
 

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,498
.[..]bearing in mind the byelaw to be used indicates that there's the likelihood of the feet soiling the seats in laymans terms.

I believe Merseyrail gets/used to get convictions for feet on seat under 'interfering with the comfort and convenience of people on the railway', as presumably the spoiling byelaw required proof of the seat being soiled by the shoe. I doubt this could have been proven in most Merseyrail cases.

I'd appreciate if any Merseyrail enforcement officers can confirm or inform which byelaw was use(d). :smile:
 

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
No. I've threatened to charge people for another fare if their feet are occupying a seat, they soon move them.

Back in slam-door days, I've seen people stretched accross the whole side of a compartment. Some with newspaper down, some not. Would you charge them four fares?
 

stut

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2008
Messages
1,924
I fail to see why clean socks or shoes on a bag/paper would be a problem on a quiet train. It's quite commonplace in Switzerland - if it's not banned there, it must be clean!
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,413
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
The last time that I travelled on a Merseyrail unit, the coach was full of notices about "Not putting feet on seats". They must have had a particular problem with this, as I have not seen such a poster campaign in units before in other TOC units.

Is there any medical reason why people have to put their feet on seats?
 

martin2345uk

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2011
Messages
2,401
Location
Essex
Ugh, I HATE people who put their feet on seats! It just shows a complete and utter lack of respect!

When I see people putting a newspaper down and then putting their feet on that, it's fine, as they obviously are showing consideration that they don't want to make the seat dirty.

And people taking their shoes off first doesn't bother me, even if their feet are a touch sweaty, it'd soon dry out, and wouldn't mess up the next person's trousers like mud from shoes would...

That said, I've never felt so uncomfortable on a train that I've felt the need to put my feet on the seat...
 

ert47

Member
Joined
28 Feb 2010
Messages
688
On a busy train it should be disallowed, on quiet trains what's the problem?

When people have their shoes on - even if its not muddy, dirt can accumilate getting the seats dirty. (in an extreme case) Would you want to sit on a seat that could leave dirt marks on your trousers?

I've put my feet up on trains, but never on the uphostery (unless I take off my shoes first) (and on tables - for that matter.)
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,851
Location
East Anglia
Shoes off is fine by me, also acceptable is placing a newspaper on the seat and having feet on the paper rather than the seat fabric.

Have to agree as long as socks are not directly beside me. Doing this or using a paper shows consideration for others & completley pacifies me.

Remember these are often the sort of people who think nothing of putting their shoes on their own furniture, let alone taking them off at the front door!!
 

Sheridan

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2012
Messages
618
Merseyrail also quote a survey that says one of the things that irritates their passengers most is having feet on seats, as justification for having a strict policy, not that any is really needed. I don't really mind when people have their feet on the metal framework on either side of the seat. It may well make the upholstery dirty on the side, but not on the top bit where you actually sit. The only people I tend to see with their feet up on Merseyrail these days are young lads with headphones in and hoods up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top