I was trying to paraphrase a complicated set of regulations and laws.
Youn go on to say Note especially the use of the word theory.
You then go onto state which simply validates what I was saying originally.
It also makes your post completely worthless, apart from an attempt to say who can piddle up the wall higher. :roll:
If you REALLY want to go head for head in fine detail of the points of Law then go for it
my bold and italics
Don't want to get into a who's got the biggest genitals debate, BUT the above attempt to suggest that blatantly inaccurate statements of legal position were an attempt to simplify is amusing!
I've written international and UK legislation, have provided witness statements as to the intent of legislation for court cases, and have engaged with some very high profile QCs for TSOL (Treasury Solicitors, HMG's in-house legal service) on HMG legal cases, have you?
