• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

X Car Stop signs not at stations

Status
Not open for further replies.

davelew99

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2011
Messages
65
On my way home today i noticed that after Rock Ferry station (toward Birkenhead) there was a 3Car Stop sign and a 6 car stop sign in between Rock Ferry and Green Lane station.

Since i've never noticed them before i wouldn't have thought they exist from the old Tranmere station (that and they look new).

So what are they for? (Or have i got this wrong and they are used in lots of places that arn't stations?)

My only suggestion is that it marks how far they have to take the train forward before being able to reverse into platforms 3/4 at Rock Ferry.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Cherry_Picker

Established Member
Joined
18 Apr 2011
Messages
2,825
Location
Birmingham
They are quite literally markers as to where the train should stop. They are for shunting, and fairly common.
 

142094

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2009
Messages
8,789
Location
Newcastle
Often you might see it for ECS moves where a driver has to change ends - helps to ensure that the full length of the train is past a signal too.
 

First class

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2008
Messages
2,731
Merseyrail has 3 and 6 car markers all over the network.

1) All stations have them
2) Where you see 3W or 6W that is the wash plant stopping point.
3) Lineside, they are either for:
Stopping at signal positions
Overnight stabling
Clear of "points" crossing over markers

That said, 9 and 12 carriage ECS movements are not uncommon, but the 6-car marker is used.

The longest Merseyrail consist was incidentally 15-car in the Winter last year, with passengers in the first 2 6-car units. The first had failed in the tunnels, so the 6 behind was sent to couple up. That didn't work, and for whatever reason, Control decided to send in a 3-car to rescue a 12-car... incidentally it worked eventually as the leading 6-car actually self corrected.
 

davelew99

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2011
Messages
65
Cool, thanks for the info. I'd seen them at stations plenty of times and knew what they were for, i just hadn't seen them anywhere else.

In this case, it will be for clearing the points to allow reversing into Rock Ferry plat 3/4.

Interesting on the 15 car in the tunnel, i hadn't given it much thought before but what would be used to rescue a stricken train in a mersey tunnel?
 

First class

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2008
Messages
2,731
Cool, thanks for the info. I'd seen them at stations plenty of times and knew what they were for, i just hadn't seen them anywhere else.

In this case, it will be for clearing the points to allow reversing into Rock Ferry plat 3/4.

Interesting on the 15 car in the tunnel, i hadn't given it much thought before but what would be used to rescue a stricken train in a mersey tunnel?

You just keep sending in 3-car units until it can move.

If something extreme happened then you would summons the battery tug shunter from Kirkdale to pull to the depot.
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
2,175
Location
Huyton
You just keep sending in 3-car units until it can move.

If something extreme happened then you would summons the battery tug shunter from Kirkdale to pull to the depot.

would that make it all the way into the tunnel and back? considering how seep the tunnel is?
All that tug is used for is pushing units into and out of the wheel lathe, all other shunting AFAIK is done under own power, or using another unit.
 

First class

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2008
Messages
2,731
would that make it all the way into the tunnel and back? considering how seep the tunnel is?
All that tug is used for is pushing units into and out of the wheel lathe, all other shunting AFAIK is done under own power, or using another unit.


It can pull a 12 car on a flat section, so should be capable of pulling a 3-car on a steeper section. The tug isn't mainline certified though afaik, so special dispensation would have to be given anyway.

I think Merseyrail would do well to get a 73 or 92 Thunderbird, especially given the reliability of the current fleet will only get worse as the age becomes apparent.

Loads of Cl.92s are stored aren't they?
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,573
Location
Macclesfield
I think Merseyrail would do well to get a 73 or 92 Thunderbird, especially given the reliability of the current fleet will only get worse as the age becomes apparent.

Loads of Cl.92s are stored aren't they?
Good grief, can you imagine the power draw on the Merseyrail juice from a 92?:shock: That'd certainly ensure that nothing else was moving in the same electrical section, and probably make all the lights in Birkenhead go dim as well! :lol:

Maybe it was mistaken short term thinking for Merseyrail to get rid of their four 73s.
 

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
2,175
Location
Huyton
:?:
Good grief, can you imagine the power draw on the Merseyrail juice from a 92?:shock: That'd certainly ensure that nothing else was moving in the same electrical section, and probably make all the lights in Birkenhead go dim as well! :lol:

Maybe it was mistaken short term thinking for Merseyrail to get rid of their four 73s.

a 92 would probably blow every rectifier and supply on the network!!

getting rid of the 73's was definately a mistake, although by the end of their time on ME they were in a pretty dire state.

AFAIK they never actually coupled up to a 507/8 though, I don't even know wheter they actually can, is a drophead buckeye not slightly different to a tightlock? tightlocks always look considerably bigger!
 

First class

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2008
Messages
2,731
:?:

a 92 would probably blow every rectifier and supply on the network!!

getting rid of the 73's was definately a mistake, although by the end of their time on ME they were in a pretty dire state.

AFAIK they never actually coupled up to a 507/8 though, I don't even know wheter they actually can, is a drophead buckeye not slightly different to a tightlock? tightlocks always look considerably bigger!

I don't think a 92 would do anything harmful if used correctly. Powering up to 4MW would cripple the network. I'm sure a mod could be done to REDUCE the amount of power quite easily.

You'd only want it to do 10mph pushing/pulling a stranded unit somewhere... may as well get 2 out of storage and convert them, especially for when a new fleet (eventually) arrives.

Class 73s must have been compatible with the 507/8 because they were used to shunt units about, as well as sandite and route learning.

Merseyrail need something as a thunderbird that's for sure. 3rd Rail in the middle of diesel/OHE land... rapidly ageing rolling stock, maintenance funds maybe not as generous as a few years ago, harsher winters.... When one fails at a strategic location, e.g. around Allerton/Hunts Cross, it can send delays up to Scotland, Yorkshire, Manchester, Norwich!!!

If 1 thunderbird was obtained (of any class), it should go in Liverpool Central Reverser Siding (to access both Northern/Wirral lines).
 

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
....AFAIK they never actually coupled up to a 507/8 though, I don't even know wheter they actually can, is a drophead buckeye not slightly different to a tightlock? tightlocks always look considerably bigger!

Tightlocks are bigger, but it is possible to couple them to buckeyes as 319s (tightlock) were able to do so with southern slam door stock (buckeye) to help clear the line.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,469
Location
Taunton or Kent
Are they car stop signs designed for specific trains or will stations involving varied train lengths just have to go by the "S" stop sign? :idea:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top