• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Calculating the cost of speculative open access operator projects that are unlikely to gain approval

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,446
Moderator note: Split from

Are these applications expensive to make? The second application seems to have been made on the off chance it would be approved rather than because approval was likely. It is really hard to see how they thought they would get the paths.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

XCTurbostar

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2014
Messages
2,600
Are these applications expensive to make? The second application seems to have been made on the off chance it would be approved rather than because approval wad likely. It is really hard to see how they thought they would get the paths.
The applications are free to submit to the ORR but a consultation needs to take place before as well as requiring a operator license, so in essence, all of the costs are on the requestor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,748
The applications are free to submit to the ORR but a consultation needs to take place before as well as requiring a operator license, so in essence, all of the costs are on the requestor.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Separately:
Would there be any merit in LUMO requesting TAC for Wrexham services and joining/dividing at Nuneaton?
There is a cost to NR too, as they have to appraise the bids.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,446
The applications are free to submit to the ORR but a consultation needs to take place before as well as requiring a operator license, so in essence, all of the costs are on the requestor.

There must be some cost preparing all the information etc. Clearly cheap enough for them to apply for something they knew was likely to fail.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,748
There must be some cost preparing all the information etc. Clearly cheap enough for them to apply for something they knew was likely to fail.
Some of the bidders will contract the timetabling out to a consultant, that isn't cheap.
 

Top