AngryPanda
New Member
London Terminal tickets were closed on purpose because people will have Thameslink, LNER or EMR ticket and travel through KXX. It is like at Paddington H&C you can enter to the underground using London Terminal ticket, but in reality it is not valid to travel. Instead of using Underground to travel between Finsbury Park, Highbury, KX, Old Street or Moorgate, I would just change at Finsbury Park for correct NR train.It also depends on your situation, we all know the tickets that never open the gates, such as “London Terminals - Anywhere on Great Northern” at kings cross, so there is little point in trying. Likewise at most stations carnets don’t open barriers, so why bother? Travelcards are hit and miss to if they open the barriers. I am sure railcard users also frequently get stopped. I try one, if it fails I don’t again.
For travelcard, using contactless is just easier, and you always pay correct fare for your travel zones, I see people with Zone 1 only or zone 2 tickets, or boundaries of zone 6 and they try to travel through wrong zones.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I agree, I truly believe Nation wide smartcard would be the solution, buy your ticket on the app or on the machine and just load to your smartcard and there will be no issues. Smartcards can be loaded with Travelcards too. So would believe people won't buy magnetic tickets anymore, these should exist anymore.I think that is another reason, if ticket wouldn't open a gate earlier in journey (even if it was rejected for say a manual check because railcard needs to be shown), there is an assumption by most passengers that same ticket wont open any subsequent barriers encountered during their journey either.
So if journey involves say 4 barriers, (start, 2 cross London, exit station), and first barrier rejects, then passenger is probably not going to waste time trying the other at subsequent barriers, but will go straight to manned barrier instead.
Basically the failure to program barriers to accept valid tickets early in a journey is likely to mean all subsequent barriers (even those on return) are going to be treated as needing manual checking.
So if want to avoid people going straight to manual gates, got to fix the problem of valid tickets being rejected, even if that means expensively programming obscure tickets (or simplifying ticket variations to the gate capacity)
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Why? The normal conditions of travel also apply. I don’t think it’s unreasonable for a company to impose further rules on their services. What actually differences are there? Many of TfL’s are not usually enforced.
One reason is that some people will have arrangements where they can claim some form of reimbursement from their employer on single or return tickets. This is particularly a thing since Covid where people don’t use season tickets as much. Clearly people aren’t going to want to put a single in the gate if this results in it being swallowed, which ultimately is going to cause more hassle for the staff in having to recover it.
Another potential reason is that repeatedly removing paper season tickets from wallets can cause them to wear prematurely. It can either damage the magnetic strip, or in some cases wipe the printed data off the front of the ticket. This then results in the hassle of having to have the ticket replaced.
Thirdly they may have a ticket that they know isn’t going to work the gates. My local station seems to reject valid tickets pretty much half of the time, and infuriatingly it always seems to be when one is in a hurry. People aren’t going to want to waste time trying the gates if they know the ticket isn’t going to work.
I suspect that many people will take the view that having a member of staff, or in some cases multiple staff, positioned and spending a lot of their time not doing a great deal means it’s not unreasonable to be able to manually show their ticket in either of the above scenarios, hence they might become arsey if the member of staff is awkward which could quite reasonably be seen as unreasonable and unnecessary.
In London all gates are ATG (Automated Ticket Gates), so there is no need for staff to assist customers, they are mainly to give directions or assist Visually or Mobility Impaired customers. If ticket goes through the gate and it does not open, is not the gate is the ticket.One reason is that some people will have arrangements where they can claim some form of reimbursement from their employer on single or return tickets. This is particularly a thing since Covid where people don’t use season tickets as much. Clearly people aren’t going to want to put a single in the gate if this results in it being swallowed, which ultimately is going to cause more hassle for the staff in having to recover it.
Another potential reason is that repeatedly removing paper season tickets from wallets can cause them to wear prematurely. It can either damage the magnetic strip, or in some cases wipe the printed data off the front of the ticket. This then results in the hassle of having to have the ticket replaced.
Thirdly they may have a ticket that they know isn’t going to work the gates. My local station seems to reject valid tickets pretty much half of the time, and infuriatingly it always seems to be when one is in a hurry. People aren’t going to want to waste time trying the gates if they know the ticket isn’t going to work.
I suspect that many people will take the view that having a member of staff, or in some cases multiple staff, positioned and spending a lot of their time not doing a great deal means it’s not unreasonable to be able to manually show their ticket in either of the above scenarios, hence they might become arsey if the member of staff is awkward which could quite reasonably be seen as unreasonable and unnecessary.
Last edited: