• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

WCR/RTC Railtour locomotives, fleet updates and movements

D1537

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
2,111
Location
North Yorkshire
Will have to be 34067 unless there's a rake of compliant Mk. 1s ready to go.

Riley 5s remaining in Fort William until the back end of the month.
That's what I thought ... there were rumours it was 61306, which I *would* make the effort to go and photograph.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Harpo

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2024
Messages
4,005
Location
Newport
A vacuum braked steam loco could legally work an air braked train by having a dual braked diesel coupled behind it, the diesel would automatically work as a translator.
 

Sidmouth34010

Member
Joined
30 Nov 2010
Messages
73
A vacuum braked steam loco could legally work an air braked train by having a dual braked diesel coupled behind it, the diesel would automatically work as a translator.
however then why has that not been deployed to ease the demands on 34067 and 44871/45407 ......
 

matt

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Messages
8,902
Location
Rugby
A vacuum braked steam loco could legally work an air braked train by having a dual braked diesel coupled behind it, the diesel would automatically work as a translator.
Is that allowed on the mainline? It happens on preserved railways but I don't recall it happening on the mainline before?
 

D1537

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
2,111
Location
North Yorkshire
A vacuum braked steam loco could legally work an air braked train by having a dual braked diesel coupled behind it, the diesel would automatically work as a translator.
That would get very messy at Whitby unless you had a translator diesel *and* one on the back
 

Harpo

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2024
Messages
4,005
Location
Newport
That would get very messy at Whitby unless you had a translator diesel *and* one on the back
Absolutely. Just saying that theres no operational reason for not running a VB kettle.

The other downside, of course, is ingestion of kettle crap by the diesel but it hasn’t stopped others.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Is that allowed on the mainline? It happens on preserved railways but I don't recall it happening on the mainline before?
Good question. Can’t think of an obvious reason not to.

It’s rare outside of failure conditions but I have seen it (long time ago!) on drags, but the other way around with an AO pilot, DB train engine and VB stock.
 
Last edited:

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,427
Rail Advent is reporting that the tour is 46115 with CDL MkIs...
Two diesel locos in the consist as well, and for the parts which are diesel hauled, two locomotives on the rear.

(I note that this does now explain how the train works out of Holgate sidings after the York break.)
 
Last edited:

Harpo

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2024
Messages
4,005
Location
Newport
Two diesel locos in the consist as well, and for the parts which are diesel hauled, two locomotives on the rear.
Interesting. Presumably allowed when one or both are manned*?


(*As I understand it other than single dead locos, only a pair of 20s or 2x73s can be conveyed dead in rear? But I’ve no idea why that is so.)
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,754
Location
West Riding
(*As I understand it other than single dead locos, only a pair of 20s or 2x73s can be conveyed dead in rear? But I’ve no idea why that is so.)
I’ve heard that before, but I think it might be a myth or have been superseded. I’ve seen multiple locomotives of classes other than 20 and 73 on the rear of multiple railtours over the years.


Above is a Black 5 at Dent with 2 47’s on the back.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It’s definitely Scots Guardsman on Mk1’s, just seen it at Leeds, TikTok video below:


It’s nice to see something different out from West Coast, and the Mk1’s are also looking smart!
 
Last edited:

HertiageFan

Member
Joined
30 Jul 2025
Messages
380
Location
Wakefield
I’ve heard that before, but I think it might be a myth or have been superseded. I’ve seen multiple locomotives of classes other than 20 and 73 on the rear of multiple railtours over the years.


Above is a Black 5 at Dent with 2 47’s on the back.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It’s definitely Scots Guardsman on Mk1’s, just seen it at Leeds, TikTok video below:


It’s nice to see something different out from West Coast, and the Mk1’s are also looking smart!
That’s great
 

neil65

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2022
Messages
547
Location
Huddersfield, Kirklees, United Kingdom
46115 Scots Guardsman and support coach head to the MRM for servicing

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The rumours started on Thursday that today's Esk Valley rail tour was to be a bit different from the normal Tangmere and coffins!!
And for once the rumours were true!!
46115 Scots Guardsman hauling a full rake of CDL fitted Mk 1 coaches, it's been a long time coming and thank you WCRC for carrying out this conversion.
There are photos of all the Mk 1 coaches starting here with
99122 Alexandra
Anyway
I set off early to be at York for the approx 8am arrival, only to find a handful of people waiting for it to arrive, but running about 10 minutes late
46115 Scots Guardsman arrived in P11 at York

After servicing at the NRM 46115 backs down into P11 to join the stock

and finally gets away with a lot of slipping for Whitby

In Between 46115 arriving and leaving the Highland Blue Pullman HST arrived and departed for Scotland with
43059 Loch Shiel T'n'T 43050 Loch Morar with the Blue Pullman HST

Also seen was one of the reinstated GBRf class 60's
60085 Snowdon approaching York with 6H12 0624 Tyne Coal Terminal Gbrf to Drax Aes (Gbrf)

Neil
 
Last edited:

Gunslinger

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2018
Messages
27
My full video from today:

Note from the video that only one door per Mk1 vehicle seems to have been CDL fitted. Other doors are presumably locked shut. Assume this meets emergency evacuation requirements?
 

37069

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2025
Messages
280
Location
Cumbria
Note from the video that only one door per Mk1 vehicle seems to have been CDL fitted. Other doors are presumably locked shut. Assume this meets emergency evacuation requirements?
There's indicator lights at both ends of the First Opens (six vehicles) and at one end of the RMB. So all of their end doors will be fitted, with the centre doors locked out as previously. Just a single emergency release fitted per side (diagonally opposite, on the left end of the vehicle)
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,676
Location
Hampshire
There's indicator lights at both ends of the First Opens (six vehicles) and at one end of the RMB. So all of their end doors will be fitted, with the centre doors locked out as previously. Just a single emergency release fitted per side (diagonally opposite, on the left end of the vehicle)
Very much the same as a lot of other ex-BR stock and the LSL Mk1s. I’d hazard a guess that the CDL has been harvested from the Mk2s which headed up to Carnforth earlier in the year.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,427
Very much the same as a lot of other ex-BR stock and the LSL Mk1s. I’d hazard a guess that the CDL has been harvested from the Mk2s which headed up to Carnforth earlier in the year.
It isn't the same design fitted to the Mark 2s, as the lock is not applied as a dropping bolt at the top of the door, but as a sideways bolt in the lower panel. Perhaps some parts in the control apparatus are consistent.
 
Last edited:

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,676
Location
Hampshire
It isn't the same design fitted to the Mark 2s, as the lock is not applied as a dropping bolt at the top of the door, but as a sideways bolt in the lower panel. Perhaps some parts in the control apparatus are consistent.

Well, certainly some of the components (eg the emergency door release switches) at the very least, otherwise good luck finding a manufacturer for those. I know that another tour operator has re-used components from Mk3s on its Mk1s.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,427
I know that another tour operator has re-used components from Mk3s on its Mk1s.
Yes, absolutely, the LSL CDL variant looks very much like transplanted Mark 3 equipment.

These are quick pictures of the CDL stuff in a WCR vehicle. The door lock itself must be new equipment.


1791564806418.png1791564828802.png
 
Last edited:

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,676
Location
Hampshire
Interestingly not the same as VT.
It does appear to be a newer system that’s for sure, different to the system fitted to the HDL or LSL fleets too. And considerably different to the Maglock’s on the LUL TC and Swanage 117.
 

alexl92

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2014
Messages
2,370
If you mean 48151, it did a private charter with some MK1s a few weeks ago.

One assumes if West Coast have gone to the expense of CDL fitting their MK1s, then this will be compatible with all their steam fleet. Otherwise they don't gain much.
 

martin butler

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2018
Messages
891
Now that West Coast have a vac braked mk1 set that's CDL compliant, that will mean that of their fleet they will have more engines available to them, i can think of without including Tangmere, 46115, 45110, 48151 one of the Jubilees, and the other black 5, the number of which escapes me,
Alot depends on how swiftly they can fit out a second rake, and of course where the CDL is acquired from, I'm half expecting many or the mk2's the air cons, to be stripped for their locking systems. Or sold on,
 

Top