• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The Labour Party under Andy Burnham

8ace

Member
Joined
25 Dec 2019
Messages
302
Location
Brighton
I find subscriptions where you have to phone to cancel the most irritating. You should be able to cancel online if you’ve taken up the sub online. Happy with auto renewal as an option. Off by default.

Anyway, this is small beer. Still waiting to find out what Burnham is actually going to do.
I had this with something a few years ago (I can't recall what), so I emailed them and said that I was deaf (I'm not) so couldn't speak to someone on the blower. Sub cancelled straight away :D
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

styles

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
4,917
Location
Gwynedd
I had this with something a few years ago (I can't recall what), so I emailed them and said that I was deaf (I'm not) so couldn't speak to someone on the blower. Sub cancelled straight away :D
I'm gonna try this one next time I hit a brick wall with emails!
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,243
Location
UK
Looks like there could be some big shakeups in social care in the pipeline.





Andy Burnham wants to offer access to free social care services to everyone in England, and will put his plans before voters at the next general election.

The prime minister told the BBC that it would be a system in which "everyone contributes, everyone is covered". He did not rule out tax rises, acknowledging it may be "difficult or unpopular" with some.

Burnham said he wants to set out his "vision" on Tuesday and Whitehall troubleshooter Baroness Casey, who is conducting a review, will advise on the "best way of doing it".
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,511
Location
Taunton or Kent
I still think assisted dying should be part of any social care plan. It doesn't matter how much one has to pay for it, in whatever form, for some death is preferable to a life of 24/7 care with no serious understanding of who one is or what's going on around them.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,609
Location
Isle of Man
Looks like there could be some big shakeups in social care in the pipeline.
More tax on us Gen X and millennials to hand freebies out to the boomers who created this mess in the first place. It’s bad enough having to pay the pensions of people who retired at 60 when I won’t get to retire until 70.

No thanks.

The issue with social care in the UK funding, it is private equity cash grabbing.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,511
Location
Taunton or Kent
More tax on us Gen X and millennials to hand freebies out to the boomers who created this mess in the first place. It’s bad enough having to pay the pensions of people who retired at 60 when I won’t get to retire until 70.

No thanks.

The issue with social care in the UK funding, it is private equity cash grabbing.
Depends, a lot councils are cash-strapped in part because of how much money they have to spend on social care. If they are relieved of this as a result of a dedicated fund, then a whole host of other issues get dealt with better that benefits all generations. Private equity though is an issue I agree.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,243
Location
UK
More tax on us Gen X and millennials to hand freebies out to the boomers who created this mess in the first place. It’s bad enough having to pay the pensions of people who retired at 60 when I won’t get to retire until 70.
Yes, I do worry that it will be a case of tax the working population to pay for a generation of people that had to pay no such tax. Especially given the propensity of the Tories to refer to taxes on inheriting large amounts of money in misleading an inaccurate manners such as calling them "death taxes". I'm open to the idea of it, certainly, and know of people that have had a very diffciult time with their family members in their old age, but we can't pretend that there are easy answers.
The issue with social care in the UK funding, it is private equity cash grabbing.
I don't think that issue is just limited to social care funding. I don't know if a "National Care Service" is still on the cards, but I'd certainly be worried that it could end up as a load of greedy private companies in the trench coat of nationalisation.
 

Broucek

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2020
Messages
949
Location
UK
Having sold her home, my mum's care home is gradually burning through any inheritance that might have come to me and my sibling.

And that's fine. I don't see why the state should pay given she has the money...

If it did pay, it would just be subsidising my sibling and I getting an unearned windfall from inheritance.

Now, my sibling and I are both pretty solvent which may skew my perspective. But subsiding inheritors is not an obvious use of public money.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,024
Location
Surrey
More tax on us Gen X and millennials to hand freebies out to the boomers who created this mess in the first place. It’s bad enough having to pay the pensions of people who retired at 60 when I won’t get to retire until 70.
Us late boomers are having wait as well to receive state pension!! Anyhow despite that I do support our generation having to pay NI as well as income tax for say another 5-10yrs after pensionable age to reflect the improvements in longevity that has been achieved partly through the NHS.
 

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
15,263
More tax on us Gen X and millennials to hand freebies out to the boomers who created this mess in the first place. It’s bad enough having to pay the pensions of people who retired at 60 when I won’t get to retire until 70.

No thanks.

The issue with social care in the UK funding, it is private equity cash grabbing.
The current system is completely untenable in my view.

Scotland seems to have achieved something rather better. If probably not perfect.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,024
Location
Surrey
"Laudable" was what my dad called something that I liked, that he didn't, but couldn't think of a particularly good reason for not liking. What is this 'family unit' of which you speak?
Families taking responsibility for each other thats is very prevalent in other societies like Japan and Italy
 

speedy1

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2023
Messages
401
Location
Mossley
Another handout for house-builders with a new George Osborne style help-to-buy scheme. He even was honest and mentioned the builders in one of the announcements.

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...new-scheme-for-first-time-home-buyers-england

Under the scheme, first-time buyers will get a 20% equity loan to help them buy a new-build home, with an initial interest free period and a requirement of a minimum deposit of just 2.5%.

Red Tories...got to get that quick-and-easy GDP bump!
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
11,143
Location
Redcar

speedy1

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2023
Messages
401
Location
Mossley
Yet wasn't the George Osborne style help-to-buy scheme just an extension of one that had been introduced a few years earlier? The one introduced by Labour.....
Maybe, my memory is failing. Not quite a gotcha though when I commented "Red Tories", calling them all the same :) It's a bad scheme whoever implements it
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,511
Location
Taunton or Kent
Another handout for house-builders with a new George Osborne style help-to-buy scheme. He even was honest and mentioned the builders in one of the announcements.

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...new-scheme-for-first-time-home-buyers-england



Red Tories...got to get that quick-and-easy GDP bump!
Property developers are huge political donors and will donate hefty sums to whichever party is set to be in government. If Reform UK ever got in they would be bankrolled by them too (especially given Jenrick's shady record with Richard Desmond). This scheme is one of the results. The way to address this is to outright ban/severely cap all political donations.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,243
Location
UK
Maybe, my memory is failing. Not quite a gotcha though when I commented "Red Tories", calling them all the same :) It's a bad scheme whoever implements it
It is a shame that the announcement wasn't about the most important way that has been shown to work to make housing more affordable - building social housing.
 

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
15,263
Yet wasn't the George Osborne style help-to-buy scheme just an extension of one that had been introduced a few years earlier? The one introduced by Labour.....
scheme before 2013 was FirstBuy which apparently started in 2011
So coalition schemes.
Not sure there was any equivalent pre 2010.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Another handout for house-builders with a new George Osborne style help-to-buy scheme. He even was honest and mentioned the builders in one of the announcements.

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...new-scheme-for-first-time-home-buyers-england



Red Tories...got to get that quick-and-easy GDP bump!
I would assume an equity loan from govt means the taxpayer gets repaid the loan at an equity stake so if house prices are above inflation the taxpayer gets a stake in that.
Doesn’t necessarily make it a good thing though.
 
Last edited:

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
15,263
Precisely. These days more and more are not standing for it. Often, I gather, in the face of great pressure to conform from Social Services departments.
Indeed and Maybe the case. Probably is.
Social Services only become involved in paying for it if the person in need has less than c£23 k in all assets of course.
But also such women may themselves need to work in paid employment to bring enough money in to sustain existing direct family commitments.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,525
Location
LBK
Families taking responsibility for each other thats is very prevalent in other societies like Japan and Italy
Orientalist myth in Japan's case. As a proportion of elderly population, more elderly people are in care homes in Japan. Over a million people. Here it's 350K or so.
 

Top