• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The woes of the Cotswold line and Oxford station

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,912
Location
Cambridge
Since March, I’ve commuted by train from Worcester to Oxford between 2 and 4 days a week.

The cost of the train tickets adds up, but over the course of the six months I must have got at least 25% of it back from delay repay, because I almost never arrive on time. The return journey is usually by far the worst. But I find the poor performance of the Cotswold to be the combined result of three flaws, the single line, strange format of Worcester Foregate St, and the bottleneck of Oxford.

The first problem is of course the single track of the Cotswold line between Oxford and Charlbury and between Evesham and Malvern Link (passing points at Evesham and Worcester Shrub Hill). It takes a mere five minute delay to completely throw the line off, and I’m usually sat at Charlbury or Evesham for up to fifteen minutes waiting for passing service. Okay, fair enough, plenty of lines like the West of England line have that issue. Fine.

But then a second problem is the awkward set up through Worcester. I’m not sure how many people know this, but the two platform station of Worcester Foregate Street consists of two single lines with no connection between them. Single track between Birmingham and Malvern, and single track between Oxford, Shrub Hill and Malvern. Which means the single track between Worcester Shrub Hill and Worcester Foregate Street has to be shared by London Malvern services, Bristol Foregate Street services, and hourly Stratford Foregate Street services which pop into Foregate Street first, and therefore don’t arrive into Foregate Street on the other single track directly from Birmingham. So a train will regularly arrive at Shrub Hill, and then have to wait for a London train that’s only just left Malvern Link to get there, before it can proceed. And all too often, they just abandon the service at Shrub Hill. That’s happened four times out of the last six commutes I’ve made.

And then the third problem, which I think is what needs tackling most of all — is Oxford. It’s a complete and utter bottleneck. I appreciate Platform 5 is being built, but frankly, it needs to be demolished and rebuilt not unlike Reading, track and all. It could do with three through islands. When I arrive for the train to Worcester, I can often see trains queuing outside to reach the two through platforms (which are bi-directional), late Cotswold services, regularly late 2tph CrossCountry services, London services terminating and being sent to the sidings, same for the Bristol service in the hour I’m there, and a mixture of both terminating and through Didcot shuttles.

The Banbury service gets to Oxford very early and blocks the main down platform for about ten minutes, leaving multiple trains going both northbound and southbound to squeeze through the other platform. It’s completely ridiculous and just adds to the delays. I’ve already mentioned the ways in which the Cotswold line is already delayed, and the CrossCountry services are hardly famed for being on time. And what’s all the more annoying is there’s two desperately needed through tracks in the middle, but useless to anything except freight as they don’t have platforms!

It doesn’t help that many of the Oxford station staff are persistently rude and unpleasant in my experience. What I have noticed is lots of people wanting London end up on my 1853 to Worcester by mistake, as it comes in on the platform usually used for southbound services, but to be honest, the onboard staff make SO many announcements about this on the train (to the extent where it comes across condescending) so if that happens I have little sympathy.

It’s probably not a priority to redouble the rest of the Cotswold line, or sort the irritating “two separate single lines” format at Worcester Foregate Street, but I reckon Oxford needs to be rebuilt, or at the very least, through platforms added.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Zomboid

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2025
Messages
2,310
Location
Oxford
Platform 5 should go some way to alleviating the issue at Oxford. And the bridge for Platform 2 to become a through platform has been installed. Platform 1 could probably be split into two 160m north facing bay platforms once the station building is demolished for the P2 extension.

I don't wholly disagree that flattening it and starting again would give the best outcome, but after the Botley Road saga, nobody is going near that any time soon. A new station building, 4 through platforms (and 2 non-platform roads) and 1 or 2 north facing bays is the best that's going to happen in any foreseeable future. And that's probably enough to handle what the rest of the system can throw at it.

Foregate St is a strange arrangement, there seems to be plenty of space for crossovers between there and the divergence, presumably it was "over-rationalised" some time ago, and it'll be put back to a more usual arrangement at some point.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
9,156
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
While not in any way denying the undoubted problems on the Cotswold Line, I must correct you on one point. The line between Henwick box - just across the river from Foregate Street - and Malvern Wells - is still double track.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,912
Location
Cambridge
While not in any way denying the undoubted problems on the Cotswold Line, I must correct you on one point. The line between Henwick box - just across the river from Foregate Street - and Malvern Wells - is still double track.
I know, I live by the level crossing there ;) But I did say between Shrub Hill and before Malvern Link :lol:
 

PeterC

Established Member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
4,786
Foregate St is a strange arrangement, there seems to be plenty of space for crossovers between there and the divergence, presumably it was "over-rationalised" some time ago, and it'll be put back to a more usual arrangement at some point.
Foregate St totally threw me the first time that I used it. Having arrived at what looked like the down platform I naturally went straight to what i assumed would be the up platform for my return journey.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,613
Location
Taunton or Kent
How capacity-limiting are the semaphores in the Worcester area? IIRC Shrub Hill-Foregate Street is one block, so a train in one prevents any leaving the other.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,751
How capacity-limiting are the semaphores in the Worcester area? IIRC Shrub Hill-Foregate Street is one block, so a train in one prevents any leaving the other.
Its not brilliant, also add Droitwich into the mix too.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,686
Location
Northampton
How capacity-limiting are the semaphores in the Worcester area? IIRC Shrub Hill-Foregate Street is one block, so a train in one prevents any leaving the other.
Pedantically, Semaphores and Absolute block are quite separate things. It's the Absolute Block that's a problem for the capacity, rather than specifically the signalling type. I.e. if you swapped the Sempahores for Colour lights but continued to work AB regulations, you'd have minimal to no capacity change. [End pedant]

The number of single lead junctions in the area don't help either (Norton Jn for the Cotswold line, Abbotswood Jn to/from Cheltenham, Stoke Works jn, Foregate Street both ways, etc).
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
9,156
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Pedantically, Semaphores and Absolute block are quite separate things. It's the Absolute Block that's a problem for the capacity, rather than specifically the signalling type. I.e. if you swapped the Sempahores for Colour lights but continued to work AB regulations, you'd have minimal to no capacity change. [End pedant]

The number of single lead junctions in the area don't help either (Norton Jn for the Cotswold line, Abbotswood Jn to/from Cheltenham, Stoke Works jn, Foregate Street both ways, etc).
Presumably any potential reinstatement of additional track capacity and enhanced junctions will have to wait for resignalling of the area to be authorised?
 

PartyOperator

Member
Joined
26 May 2019
Messages
194
I quite like the current arrangement. The tickets are usually free after delay repay and it's easy to make plans because the delays are so predictable.

I can imagine it would be frustrating for a regular commuter though.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,686
Location
Northampton
Presumably any potential reinstatement of additional track capacity and enhanced junctions will have to wait for resignalling of the area to be authorised?
Yes, and although it's probably been talked about, I expect it to be too far down the list in priority for funding.

I also suspect that if modern overlap standards are applied to the Worcester area it would reduce capacity on the triangle itself, so it may be pushed onto the 'wait for ETCS' pile.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,751
Yes, and although it's probably been talked about, I expect it to be too far down the list in priority for funding.

I also suspect that if modern overlap standards are applied to the Worcester area it would reduce capacity on the triangle itself, so it may be pushed onto the 'wait for ETCS' pile.
It got relatively close over the last 4 or 5 years for a colour light resignalling, but got kicked down the road.
 

VT 390

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2018
Messages
1,755
The biggest issue I find if the unpredictability of when/where services are terminated short when delays occur.
I get there will be different factors to consider each day but sometimes with only a relatively short delay will lead to a Malvern/Hereford service terminating short at Shrub Hill but the next day the same service may have a more significant delay yet still run through and disrupt more services. The worse cases of this were on West Midlands Railway strike days where GWR services for Great Malvern were terminated at Worcester stations leaving very long (multiple hours) gap in the onward service to Malvern/Hereford with no alternative transport.
I am all for terminating services short to minimise disruption for the majority of services, I just find the inconsistency of this on the Cotswold line worse than other routes I use regularly.
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
6,642
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
At least things have improved in recent years with the redoubling of parts of the Cotswold Line. And it could be worse; There was at one time a scheme to alter the double line between Norton Junction (between Evesham and Worcester) and Shrub Hill to two single lines, thankfully not proceeded with.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,912
Location
Cambridge
there we go! just been turfed off my Great Malvern bound train, which low and behold, is terminating now at flippin’ Shrub Hill!
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,613
Location
Taunton or Kent
I'd at least double track each end (Wolvercote Jct-Hanborough and Norton Jct-Worcestershire Parkway). This would stop trains waiting on a mainline for services to leave the single-line, especially if running late.
 

Top