Yes....the late Peter Rayner for one. Well worth reading his excellent book "On and Off the Rails" for his candid opinions on the cack-handed way the railways were privatised.
You are referring to two individuals who lacked any foresight. Where we are was entirely predictable.What was it that John Major, Brian Mawhinney, et al, we're saying all those years ago? Something along the lines of privatisation increasing passenger choice and service efficiency?
Ah, the 'deeply inefficent BR' as Major said - at least BR always got you home.Yet another sad indictment of thirty years of a fragmented - in more ways than one - railway system. What was it that John Major, Brian Mawhinney, et al, we're saying all those years ago? Something along the lines of privatisation increasing passenger choice and service efficiency? If it does really turn out that there were no workable back-up systems in place, the boss of Cross Country should fall on her sword.
Very true....but if it hadn't been for the ridiculous fragmentation of the system, we wouldn't have different sections of the passenger business operating from random different buildings around the city and indeed the country. I would be interested to know why both Cross Country and West Midlands Trains declined to move their control offices into the West Midlands ROC.Without more facts, trying to place blame on today’s major collapse is pure speculation. Trying to attach it to events of 32 years ago (privatisation) is even further stretched as, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no similar whole TOC meltdown of a similar type in that time.
Like several other major rail events recently, root causes and their real (as opposed to guessed) underlying issues are yet to be disclosed.
Rather than trying to cobble a route together as close to the regular route as possible, the easiest option in many cases would be to just go via London, GWR and then either EMR or LNER to Yorkshire and the north eastFor once, I feel sorry for any holiday makers trying to return home to say the North East from the South West, Having to decide how to get home.
GWR service to Didcot, then to Oxford then Birmingham and connect somehow on services to the North East?
Or GWR to Worcester having to change at Bristol and then to New Street?
Not exactly a decent journey home.
GWR do not go further north than Worcester, and only XC go from Cheltenham to Birmingham directly.
XC services from Penzance are now restricted to two services per day and GWR only have the one direct service a day from Penzance to Bristol Temple Meads.
Not exactly a decent connection to the rest of the country when an operator crashes down.
Pre-privatisation, something taking down a control with no means of back-up could have affected an entire region. Perhaps we should reflect on the fragmentisation meaning that the whole railway is still open but ‘only’ minus a major train operator?Very true....but if it hadn't been for the ridiculous fragmentation of the system, we wouldn't have different sections of the passenger business operating from random different buildings around the city and indeed the country.
Said report says that trains from Leeds to Manchester are affected.Apart from the "last mile" into Peterborough, all of this is now on railway operated by the Greater Anglia Integrated Business Unit.
GBR Anglia
Today with the press reveal of GBR Anglia units 357008/020 and 720144/501 and an outline of plans for GBR Anglia and the following press release produces some clarity on proceedings...www.railforums.co.uk
Could that have something to do with it?
BBC now has a report see here:
![]()
CrossCountry cancels 'almost all' UK services after power cut
The operator says services will be "significantly disrupted" until further notice.www.bbc.co.uk
Oh great. That's okay then.Pre-privatisation, something taking down a control with no means of back-up could have affected an entire region. Perhaps we should reflect on the fragmentisation meaning that the whole railway is still open but ‘only’ minus a major train operator?
Sounds like gross neglience on the part of whoever sanctioned that arrangement.I believe XC’s control is based at their HQ in Cannon House which is just a serviced office building shared with other (non-railway) companies. I would therefore be surprised if it had the resilience that one would expect from a more conventional control centre [notwithstanding the fact there have been some high-profile failures elsewhere on the network before].
That's exactly it, until GBR have a plan for more cross country carriages they'll want absolutely nothing to do with it.They don't want to taint the GBR brand with CrossCountry anytime soon.
How many routes are there with no reasonable alternative though? You can't get from Bristol to Birmingham without CrossCountry or a very indirect route via Newport. So yeah maybe not an entire region but there are chunks of the railway that are ruined by it.Pre-privatisation, something taking down a control with no means of back-up could have affected an entire region. Perhaps we should reflect on the fragmentisation meaning that the whole railway is still open but ‘only’ minus a major train operator?
Because XCs Control office is just a floor in rented office building shared with many other non railway, non safety critical businesses.
Ok fair enough, thanks! That's surprising though
Was there really nothing in the tender documents that required XC to provide and demonstrate sufficient resilience, or did the DfT accept that they’re OK if a power cut can knock out an entire TOC?
* business continuity / disaster recovery
At risk of asking a stupid question, why aren't there backup generators for critical operations such as this?
Because XCs Control office is just a floor in rented office building shared with many other non railway, non safety critical businesses.
Its also a 1960/70s building that appears not to be refurbished to a modern spec (you can see the lighting internally compared to new buildings looks ancient in colour). I bet the electrical wiring internaly in places is old and has not been touched.
It wouldn't make a blind bit of difference.Could she use this as an excuse to bring forward nationalisation of the operator? I'm not saying that would instantly improve things, but it wouldn't be the first time a TOC was stripped due to some issue the TOC was responsible for.
Doesn't matter if it was pre BR, BR, Railtrack, TOC/FOC and soon GBR. People leave the industry with the same thoughts and people are still career railwaymen, it didn't all end in 1994.Indeed, and I remember all those career railwaymen who left BR and took all their operating experience with them because the privateers thought they could do it better. Well, here we are now.
I suspect this route, being separate from the core Cross Country network, may be controlled from a separate location rather than the main XC control room?Does anyone have any idea why the Peterborough/Cambridge/Stansted services can run? It seems weird that Control being unavailable would allow some sections to work as normal while others cannot.
I didn't say it would, but any government looking for PR spin would do something like this, even if the situation on the ground won't instantly change with it.It wouldn't make a blind bit of difference.
Agreed that it's probably not a "reasonable alternative" and may not be available on a Sunday - but for the rest of the week GW to Worcester and WM on from there would be the alternative from Bristol to Birmingham for those who have time...How many routes are there with no reasonable alternative though? You can't get from Bristol to Birmingham without CrossCountry or a very indirect route via Newport. So yeah maybe not an entire region but there are chunks of the railway that are ruined by it.
No, it's controlled from Canon House along with the other services. This puzzles me as well as it's managed from the same desk that runs the Midlands and Manchester services.I suspect this route, being separate from the core Cross Country network, may be controlled from a separate location rather than the main XC control room?
Things are not going to change overnight just because GBR comes into existence. It will take years.Only a year to go to nationalisation (or earlier if there are any more disasters) - what is intriguing is how XC will fit into GBR. Presumably it will be divvied up amongst the 'regions', including the Control function?
Changing at Shrub Hill or Foregate Street would get you to BirminghamNightmare if you want to travel north from Oxford. No East West rail available, changing at Worcester Parkway won”t work. Walk across Bicester it is…
See post #33, which says:Nightmare if you want to travel north from Oxford. No East West rail available, changing at Worcester Parkway won”t work. Walk across Bicester it is…
Chiltern are doing their bit this morning, running Oxford-Birmingham services in the XC paths:
Pre-privatisation, something taking down a control with no means of back-up could have affected an entire region. Perhaps we should reflect on the fragmentisation meaning that the whole railway is still open but ‘only’ minus a major train operator?