It should be, if not, create it.
Who’s paying?
There’s a fine avenue of mature silver birch on the lineside after Stourbridge Junction heading towards Lye. Lucky the fire was the other side of Stourbridge.However the recent fire at Stourbridge which has closed the OWW Kidderminster to Stourbridge Junction route this weekend did not appear to originate from the railway.
Agreed but how to meet environmental concerns?They need to have teams round the country clearing the vegetation all year round. When they chop down the buddleia they need to kill the roots.
Yes I agree with that.Agreed but how to meet environmental concerns?
The same people that pay all the delay repay and now government controlled TOC delays department middle men, the good old tax payer.
Is there a way to direct the money to employ an NR Vegetation crew?
They need to have teams round the country clearing the vegetation all year round. When they chop down the buddleia they need to kill the roots.
It isn't climate change enhances the severity of wildfires through rising temperatures and more severe dry spells, but it isn't a cause in itself. Removing line side vegetation is unlikely to make any significant difference to the carbon footprint, afforestation is a far better method, although I am not in general a fan of treating the natural world as little more than an inconvenience to be disposed of at will, the UK is already one of the most nature depleted countries in the world.When the direct cause of these wildfires is climate change, is it remotely wise to be seen expending even more carbon in an effort to completely eliminate all carbon capturing vegetation from the permanent way?
No, because trees, probably much to the disappointment of the press, haven't started combusting because a train goes past them.Given the recent heatwaves and numerous fire incidents across the UK, isn't it time for Network Rail to adopt a more robust policy to seek funding to properly de-vegetate the lineside?
Killing the roots of buddleia in many places on the railway would perhaps cause a lot more risk.Cutting back is pointless if you don't kill the roots
Well there's no realistic way of reversing it and clearing vegetation will be a tiny amount of carbon in the grand scheme of things, something has got to be done other than giving upWhen the direct cause of these wildfires is climate change
A 70s style government information campaign explaining that sometimes the weather changes and some summers are hotter than others.Agreed but how to meet environmental concerns?
I wonder if some people arrested for arson will use that as their defence, if they end up in court. Not putting any money on that.When the direct cause of these wildfires is climate change