• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Severe Alert from the UK Government

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,076
Location
Wilmslow
I heard about this, but the reason I disabled this from the start is exactly this sort of nonsense. If they want to tell me I have an unexploded WW2 bomb 50 yards from my house perhaps, but not this rubbish.
It's the misuse of the system I expected from the start, so I turned it off.
Others may be happy to suffer this - their choice also.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

stuart81

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2015
Messages
131
Location
Ipswich
Complete misuse of the system which will only result in I imagine a significant amount of people turning them off now.

Certainly not a wise move by Andy Burnham, his reputation will now require rebuilding before it's even started
 

sor

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2013
Messages
779
a genuinely good thing about the UK system is that the alerts are made available on gov.uk, including when and where. Seems like its England and Wales only, with Wales additionally getting a Welsh language version

https://www.gov.uk/alerts/current-alerts
replying to myself - but from clicking through to "past alerts" you can see the last "real" one was for storms in the south west back in January (and as someone who was in Cornwall then, it was very much justified).

This sort of ruins the point of the system. It hasn't been used in the places that actually have had a wildfire, but it is used for a mere admonishment to not start fires?

That said, as I am an adult, I can simply swipe it away and move on. No need for temper tantrums.
 

Vexed

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2020
Messages
637
Location
Herts / Hants
I haven't had a second alert (and I have two SIMs in my phone, EE and Three) but I'm on a train and a few others have had their phone go off in the last few minutes.

Would I have decided to send out an alert? Maybe, there have been a lot of fires over the last couple days. If it means some lives/property are saved it's probably worth it but we'll never know that hypothetical! I'm not going to get agitated over the government sending them out for the small minority who can't think for themselves (though they'll probably be the same people who think it doesn't apply to them).

I skim-read it for a couple seconds and got on with eating my dinner.
 

stuart81

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2015
Messages
131
Location
Ipswich
I’m not quite sure why it is a reputation thing.
A lot of people I know are incredibly sceptical of Andy Burnham and how he was just shuffled into Number 10. We've not seen anything of any substance from him apart from a lot of PR spin.

Someone wil have to take the flak for the mis-use of the alert system.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,210
Location
UK
The Prime Minister released a statement about this:

"This evening, an emergency alert has been sent to people across England and Wales as the wildfire risk remains very high. The request came directly from fire and rescue services.

"I was in Stourbridge today and saw first-hand the devastating impact these fires have had on people’s homes and lives.

"Our priority now is to keep everyone safe and prevent more fires from starting.

"During this period of extreme heat, I’m asking everyone to take extra care. Please do not light any fires in gardens, the countryside or other open spaces, including parks, moorland and wooded areas.

"Our firefighters and emergency responders are working around the clock in incredibly difficult conditions.

“We can all help them. Please take the emergency alert seriously and follow the guidance in place."
 

Bayum

Established Member
Joined
21 Mar 2008
Messages
3,268
Location
Leeds
Resources are low. People continue to have BBQs and light fireworks. We’re seeing the increasing devastation the wildfires are causing.

When resources are stretched so thinly and lives continue to be endangered, we just want the government to step back? Interesting approach to take…
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,076
Location
Wilmslow
It seems that we live in an age in which people take more notice of what their phones tell them than what their brains tell them. I’m not surprised, just disappointed, but I guess that if the end result is that one person fewer is injured then it’s not a completely bad thing.
And the politicians can say - “look at what we did, we didn’t do nothing, we told everyone” etc. Politics being about being seen to do something more importantly than actually doing something. If politicians had actually done something 10-20 years ago then maybe we wouldn’t be in the position we are.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,443
Location
Isle of Man
Agreed. This seems like a misuse of the system to me.
Why?

Recent events show that people aren’t paying attention to more gentle reminders not to be absolute morons. Given the destruction that can be caused by wildfires- look at 300,000 people having to flee their homes in France- I’d say it’s exactly the sort of thing that a a national warning system should be used for.

Other countries routinely use them exactly for wildfires. The Australians- not a namby-pamby nation- do.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,210
Location
UK
When resources are stretched so thinly and lives continue to be endangered, we just want the government to step back? Interesting approach to take…
I don't think anyone has been suggesting that the government needs to "step back", nobody here in this thread at least. I think most of us that are critical of the alert are suggesting that a more standard press release/conference would have been more appropriate.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
112,941
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Why?

Recent events show that people aren’t paying attention to more gentle reminders not to be absolute morons. Given the destruction that can be caused by wildfires- look at 300,000 people having to flee their homes in France- I’d say it’s exactly the sort of thing that a a national warning system should be used for.

Other countries routinely use them exactly for wildfires. The Australians- not a namby-pamby nation- do.

For people threatened by wildfires, or for the whole country?

I personally think the lower level should just trigger the normal text tone but be required to be actively cancelled before the phone can be used to ensure it is read. Only the higher level with immediate danger to life should use the tone.

However it is US Government specced, so good luck with that.

As for Oz, it's very much a nanny state. You can for instance barely change a plug yourself.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,210
Location
UK
I guess that if the end result is that one person fewer is injured then it’s not a completely bad thing.
That's not a given, not only does the alert need to be more effective than conventional communications, there is the possibility that the alert may have caused some accidents, on the roads for example.
 

chipbury

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2021
Messages
147
Location
Bath
Didn’t work for me in the pub earlier.
Lots of phones making a noise so most people press the home button to stop the noise and the message is gone?
Surely it should stay visible after pressing the home button?
 

Cdd89

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2017
Messages
1,718
I think it's less about use/misuse and more about frequency. Obviously if they sent it something utterly frivolous that would be inappropriate, but if we get one or two of these a year that's fine tbh; in other countries like Hong Kong and the US, I get these almost monthly.

Sending a notification on a lower priority topic is better than the "test messages" they kept sending out, in any case; so hopefully this just replaces whatever the next test message would've been while conveying an actually useful message. It's good for the system to be tested occasionally so people know they have their phones configured to receive them.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,210
Location
UK
Other countries routinely use them exactly for wildfires.
I can understand in the case of imminent danger, but this wasn't "Danger, wildfires near you", it was "please don't have a BBQ", which feels less urgent.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
18,097
I’m at the Royal Albert Hall for a concert and the alerts went off just as the concert was starting. Made quite a racket.

We have a very serious situation at the moment given how dry it is. There might not be a fire where you at at the moment but it only needs a small careless incident to change that. ‘Us’ on here ‘get that’ but many won’t, so on balance I think it’s ok that the alert was used.
 

deltic

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2010
Messages
3,713
Looking up what you mean by Stourbridge (how have I not heard about that!) yes absolutely an alert should've gone out to people in the area there to warn them they may need to be evacuated and to be cautious of the fire.
The whole country did not need to be disturbed by a couple barbeques
a good example of why just putting media alerts outvdoes not work. The message appears to have gone out at the request of the fire service. At the risk of stereotyping, it is possible that most disposable bbqs are used by young people who are incredibly difficult to reach by mass media but will all have phones.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,076
Location
Wilmslow
That's not a given, not only does the alert need to be more effective than conventional communications, there is the possibility that the alert may have caused some accidents, on the roads for example.
Fair point, I agree.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

From a completely unscientific and unrepresentative survey, I believe this latest alert will cause more people to look up and disable them in future, as I’ve already done. “I didn’t realise you could turn these things off, thank you” was one response I got.
 
Last edited:

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,181
Location
LBK
Why?

Recent events show that people aren’t paying attention to more gentle reminders not to be absolute morons. Given the destruction that can be caused by wildfires- look at 300,000 people having to flee their homes in France- I’d say it’s exactly the sort of thing that a a national warning system should be used for.

Other countries routinely use them exactly for wildfires. The Australians- not a namby-pamby nation- do.
Do they use the alerts to tell people not to do stuff which might cause a fire, or do they use the emergency alert tone for notification of actual fires which are putting people in danger right now? Australia is a country of jailers more than it is prisoners btw, as covid showed. Government overreach is standard.

An emergency alert system should inform us of emergencies in progress. The last one I got was a missile warning in the UAE. I assumed the one I got today was just as urgent and dropped everything to find out it was some advice.

As per how the system was sold to the public: "Emergency Alerts is a UK government system that provides warning and advice in a life threatening emergency."

*in a life threatening emergency* being the operative part of the sentence there.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

There are also other effective ways too, press conferences would have it plastered all over the news, tv, radio, papers, and online. And that feels much more appropriate for the level of severity.
Quite. Now you have a load of people disabling the alerts. Nice one Andy.
 

Harpo

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2024
Messages
3,734
Location
Newport
I would have thought it would have been in both English and Welsh.
It was in both languages for me in Wales. Got it first in Welsh and a second time in English

Between times, as I’m not a Welsh speaker, I clicked the link which took me to the government website to be told me in English, no current alerts. I couldn’t copy and paste the Welsh text either but, picking through it, guessing at the Welsh word ‘barbeciwiau’ gave me a clue!
 

londonteacher

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2018
Messages
800
Location
Chatham
It was for me in Wales. Got it first in Welsh and a second time in English

Between times, as I’m not a Welsh speaker, I clicked the link which took me to the government website to be told me in English, no current alerts. I couldn’t copy and paste the Welsh text either but, picking through it, guessing at the Welsh word ‘barbeciwiau’ gave me a clue.
It would have been better to be in Welsh and then English on the same message.
 

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,629
Location
wales
A misuse of the system IMO.

It should be reserved for something as serious as "there's a wildfire approaching your home, get out now"

Using it for general warnings like this will just trigger lots of people googling how to disable the alerts.
We have had houndreds of wildfires this summer so personally a alert asking people to avoid lighting fires is a good call. Maybe not the emergency one though...
 

Egg Centric

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
2,803
Location
Land of the Prince Bishops
There is a temporary ban on disposable BBQ sales in England, Scotland and Wales as of today - which is probably what has prompted the alert


Meanwhile, on Amazon...

I've bought this as an experiment, as I'm curious to see what happens.

(Not to barbeque with any time soon to be clear!)
 

Trainguy34

Established Member
Joined
29 Apr 2023
Messages
1,227
Location
Kent
I'm in Spain in an area where it's about 40°, not a peep with alerts. Is it somehow less of a risk here, or are we just more competent over in Spain :lol: ?
 

sor

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2013
Messages
779
Do they use the alerts to tell people not to do stuff which might cause a fire, or do they use the emergency alert tone for notification of actual fires which are putting people in danger right now? Australia is a country of jailers more than it is prisoners btw, as covid showed. Government overreach is standard.
The equivalent Australian alert system didn't exist until fairly recently, with its first public national test conducted only a few weeks ago, so it hasn't been used in anger yet. OP may be referring to existing systems that use app based push notifications or SMSes but those won't have the same importance/impact/disruption as these formal alerts do.
I'm in Spain in an area where it's about 40°, not a peep with alerts. Is it somehow less of a risk here, or are we just more competent over in Spain :lol: ?
Spain just used their system to send out a warning message for the eclipse, including telling people to be mindful of the wildfire risk and other "common sense" admonishments. So no.
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
7,299
Location
The Fens
I only have a dimphone, and I have not been alerted.

For people threatened by wildfires, or for the whole country?
Most of England and all of Wales are threatened by wildfires. This is about not starting wildfires, which could be started by one careless act in most of England and all of Wales.

Other countries routinely use them exactly for wildfires. The Australians- not a namby-pamby nation- do.
I was in Canberra not long after their 2003 bushfire, and was taken to see the damage, including the Mount Stromlo observatory. The Australians have learned from bitter experience.

I’m at the Royal Albert Hall for a concert and the alerts went off just as the concert was starting.
Is that the Marvin Gaye Prom? I'm enjoying that on the radio!
 

Top