Just some thoughts on your specifics - hope it's clear which bits I am referring to - others may have other views so you may want to see what other people say before you go back to TPE if you have time
Hi everyone,
I need to correct something in my post above, and I have a new question.
I said two journeys on their list did not appear in my app. Having looked properly, I do not think that is right. Their list has pairs like this:
- 24 July 10:00 Liverpool to Manchester Piccadilly, and 25 July 10:00 Liverpool to Manchester Piccadilly
- 25 July 18:57 Manchester Oxford Road to Liverpool, and 25 July 17:15 same route
In each pair, only one shows in my app, marked "Changed". So these look like amendments. I booked one, moved it, the original was refunded and a new ticket issued. That would also explain the refunds they have mentioned. I am glad I did not send anything saying I had no record of them so sorry for the confusion, that was my error reading my own booking history.
Presumably if you need to do so you can explain that to them.
Also for my new question all my bookings were through Trip.com, which issues split tickets. So journeys I made once appear on TPE's list as two legs via a station I never stopped at.
Just to note for a split ticket to be valid the train must stop at the station where the ticket is split - but I suspect you mean a station 'you never got off the train at' - as I doubt the ticket issues would have given you a spilt ticket for a journey where the train did not stop.
Examples:
One booking Manchester Airport to Liverpool appears as Manchester Airport to Patricroft, then Patricroft to Liverpool
One booking Liverpool to Edinburgh appears as Liverpool to Preston, then Preston to Edinburgh
One booking Liverpool to Manchester Airport appears as Liverpool to Whiston, then Whiston to Manchester Airport
Their list is 23 entries but I make it roughly 14 actual journeys. Is it worth putting this to them? I am worried that if they price it per leg the figure doubles for no reason.
Unfortunately I suspect they are within their rights to recharge you for the
tickets you actually bought - not some way of paying a cheaper option for the journey you actually undertook when it becomes cheaper not to have spilt tickets
You can check these fares and compare using the fares site
Purchase flexible single/return tickets & Travelcards – in 3 clicks, at face value with no fees. Every British rail fare shown, railcard discounts included.
www.brfares.com
But using Anytime Single Fares (as that is what rail companies usually use in these scenarios) for the Liverpool - Edinburgh journey
Anytime Single Liverpool to Edinburgh = £103.20 (through ticket fare routed via Preston)
Anytime Single Liverpool to Preston = £17.50
Anytime Single Preston to Edinburgh = £70.50 (route via Carlisle)
So the separate split tickets here for this journey are still in your favour anyway (£88 vs £103.20) if I have done this correctly
You need to do your own calcs in a similar fashion to compare with their list I guess (
or post their list and calculations here so that fares experts here can double check it for you if you are not sure how to select the fares from the often lengthy lists of all fares possible which are listed on BRFares.com)
Actually fares charged should be on date of travel (a drop down on BR Fares 'fares period' which I didn't change but I am not sure there has been a fares increase or not since your travel - but bear this in mind if doing your own checks)
If you feel able to share it - Getting fares experts here to check their list might be a good way of verifying the costs issues at stake.
Also there is two London tickets (14 and 18 August) were bought on 31 July before I renewed on 9 August, but I travelled on both after the renewal and held a valid Railcard on both travel dates. On the 14 August journey my ticket was checked on board and I showed the renewed Railcard.
TPE have replied saying they consider the purchase date to be the relevant one. Is that position correct? The Railcard conditions I have read talk about holding a valid Railcard when you travel, and I cannot find a condition that sets a requirement at the point of purchase. I do not want to push an argument that does not hold up, so I would rather know either way before I say anything to them about it.
I am sure
they are wrong about this and you should politely push back. The requirement is to be able to show a valid Railcard when you travel, as you say - not when you buy the ticket.
Refer them to the National Rail Conditions of Travel - as per here
The relevant section I believe is Section 8 (see 8.1) which says - my bold -
"8.1 If you use a Railcard to purchase a discounted Ticket, you must carry the Railcard (and have it available for inspection) when you travel.
The Railcard must be within its period of validity when you travel (in other words it should not have expired)."
eg you could say to them for example
"The National Rail Conditions of Travel in Section 8 relating to Railcards states that "The Railcard must be within its period of validity when you travel". I purchased my new Railcard on xx date and the travel with these ticket(s) was undertaken on yy date. I therefore believe I had a fully valid ticket supported by a valid Railcard on this date and would request that you remove this from your calculation"
About where I actually stand and being straight about it, my Railcard expired 26 May and I renewed 9 August, and most of what is on their list falls in that gap. I am not going to try to argue around that. The 25 May London one was before expiry and was refunded anyway.
I have added up what I paid across these bookings, about £359. Using the Anytime Single approach suggested earlier, and counting journeys rather than legs, I think the full figure could be a fair bit higher, mainly because of the Edinburgh and London legs.
Yes, it's possible that splits etc work out differently using Anytime fares compared with Off Peak or Advance fares / different times of travel etc - but my point above remains my view - they will seek to charge for replacement tickets for the tickets you actually bought that were no valid - and FWIW I personally tend to think that is probably reasonable for them to do (unfortunately) even if it does not work out the cheapest for you
Two things I would appreciate views on:
- Do TPE tend to ask for the full Anytime Single, or the difference between that and what was paid?
Can you not tell that from the list of fares they have sent you that they want paying?
We did used to see cases of TPE being very reasonable (and I think asking for the difference) -
but in recent weeks and months we are anecdotally seeing all the train companies (esp the ones run by government now they have been re-nationalised and TPE is one of those) taking a firmer line. I suspect this is due to government issuing firmer instructions to the train companies they operate to get money owed off passengers for all the various types of fare evasion they deal with. I fear you may have to be prepared to pay for the full new Anytime single ticket. Anything less you can regard as a win.
- I am in a genuinely difficult financial position. Is it better to mention that in my reply now, or wait until they name a figure and then ask about instalments?
I'm not sure will care very much. I'd wait until you see what they say before talking about installments - you could allude to it in your reply, whilst restating your desire to co-operate and conclude the matter 'amicably' at this stage by way of justifying why you are pushing back
for example wording like:
"I am anxious to co-operate with you to resolve this matter, but unfortunately my financial position at the moment is a difficult one, so it is important to me that any sum I need to pay is a true and accurate reflection of the travel costs I owe for the period when my Railcard had expired without my realising it. Please be assured this was an oversight on my part and there was never any intention to avoid paying the correct fare"
The problem is you are not really
negotiating this with TPE here because despite them saying before they 'closed the case' earlier I don't think this prevents them taking the prosecution route for the time they caught you without a valid ticket due to no valid railcard, in which they have 6 months to refer it to court - you are at best
- pressing for accuracy and correct figures
- appealing to their better nature to some extent
I don't think they will, yet, go down the court route as you are clearly trying to resolve it - but there is always a degree of risk they might do
I will post my draft reply once I have heard back on the split ticket point, as it affects the wording.
Yes, do post your draft because you do need to make some points to them that are a bit technical to it's worth a check of your wording from experts here I think.
Thanks, this thread has been really helpful so far.