• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Lewes derailment - Thursday 13th August

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,179
Location
LBK
Of course they are. The British media are like deadly mosquitos, ready to suck on fresh blood whenever a serious incident occurs. No doubt they'll also be sitting in their studio & backseating the whole situation with unnecessary remarks to ensure they earn as much off of it as possible. Why can't they just respect the privacy of the driver, passengers and emergency services crew onboard and outside and simply have curtesy to not film until everyone's been evacuated?!
Because this is a newsworthy event which is very much in the public interest to cover.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Trumpers halt

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2022
Messages
26
Location
Sussex
If you look on ADSB Exchange you can see the police helicopter orbiting an area of track next to the Landport estate. I know this route well and by that point you're already slowing down for the stop at Lewes which would have helped. Indeed the river is close by on the East and further on is the tunnel so this could have been a lot worse than appears at this time.
 

mickey

Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
668
Of course they are. The British media are like deadly mosquitos, ready to suck on fresh blood whenever a serious incident occurs. No doubt they'll also be sitting in their studio & backseating the whole situation with unnecessary remarks to ensure they earn as much off of it as possible. Why can't they just respect the privacy of the driver, passengers and emergency services crew onboard and outside and simply have curtesy to not film until everyone's been evacuated?!
It’s well within the public interest to report on serious incidents like this - a quick look elsewhere in the world shows what it’s like to live in a country with no free press. No thanks from me.

I’d also far rather the professional outlets that are just about managing to cling on cover it so coverage is not all ‘citizen journalists’, i.e. amateurs on facebook or tiktok.
 
Joined
6 Oct 2015
Messages
14
Location
Brighton
I was on the train half an hour before this one and there was a massive jolt between Cooksbridge and Lewes, easily the worst one I've ever felt. I'd have assumed the driver reported it but judging by what's happened, it doesn't seem that way.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
2,282
A source from the Department for Transport has told the BBC that the latest understanding is that there are "no serious or fatalities".
 

ATS3

Member
Joined
16 Oct 2022
Messages
170
Location
London
It’s well within the public interest to report on serious incidents like this - a quick look elsewhere in the world shows what it’s like to live in a country with no free press. No thanks from me.

I’d also far rather the professional outlets that are just about managing to cling on cover it so coverage is not all ‘citizen journalists’, i.e. amateurs on facebook or tiktok.
The public interest is to report on the facts, not what the reports watching the feed think happened. And what does ”free press“ have to do with this? Delaying live reporting until the incident is understood better avoids any conflicting information from leaking out to the generally ignorant public. I’d also neither citizen journalists nor amateurs film frankly enough.
 
Last edited:
Joined
10 Feb 2016
Messages
131
Riding directly above a bogie gives a much different ride quality than elsewhere in the centre of a vehicle
That's certainly the case with the dreadful 196 units on WMT. In the centre of the carriage it's only uncomfortable, over the bogies when going over pointwork you'd think you were off the road.
 

DNCharingX

Member
Joined
17 Feb 2020
Messages
96
Location
SW19 in body, SE23 in spirit.
Because this is a newsworthy event which is very much in the public interest to cover.
It may be in the public interest to cover but I would imagine it is not in the interests of anyone who works on the railway that people start fearing rail travel, cancelling plans, and so on, which is what I think broadcasting these horrific scenes achieves.

I'm sure that certain media outlets will be more than happy to accompany their footage with "are railways unsafe? would this have happened with automation? should you drive to work instead?", etc etc. Classic fear mongering, especially in light of the Bedford collision.

I think this explains why in this thread, people are trying to lessen the severity of this incident, perhaps they have an interest in people continuing to use the railways :)
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,067
Location
Redcar
Okay whether or not a news chopper should be visiting the site this is early is not directly relevant, it is what it is, so lets leave it there. If anyone wants to discuss media practices in the UK further please start a new thread.
 

trivran

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2012
Messages
191
Neighbour has said from what he hears on scene 'There's only 1 serious injury'.
I copy paste on to you, in an additive rather than detractive fashion, the words of the national broadcaster:

1786639612434.png

No serious injuries or fatalities, BBC understands.

Already put on to the thread 11 minutes ago! Alas.
 

ATS3

Member
Joined
16 Oct 2022
Messages
170
Location
London
It may be in the public interest to cover but I would imagine it is not in the interests of anyone who works on the railway that people start fearing rail travel, cancelling plans, and so on, which is what I think broadcasting these horrific scenes achieves.

I'm sure that certain media outlets will be more than happy to accompany their footage with "are railways unsafe? would this have happened with automation? should you drive to work instead?", etc etc. Classic fear mongering, especially in light of the Bedford collision.

I think this explains why in this thread, people are trying to lessen the severity of this incident, perhaps they have an interest in people continuing to use the railways :)
Quite correct. It's already started after the helicopter videos came out.
 

Farigiraf

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2023
Messages
1,138
Location
Bridge on the River Cam
Either zero or very limited injuries/casualties, a rapid response, a quick evacuation, and some fairly clear information on rerouting and ticket acceptance from NR. Though these accidents are never good to see happen, given the fairly lax nature towards the heat-related issues lately on the railway (either no problem identified or total give up), I'd say this could've been a lot worse.

Sorry to those affected, bravo to those involved in sorting it out smoothly!
 

AvidTrainGuy

Member
Joined
19 Oct 2024
Messages
13
Location
West Midlands
The public interest is to report on the facts, not what the reports watching the feed think happened. And what does ”free press“ have to do with this? Delaying live reporting until the incident is understood better avoids any conflicting information from leaking out to the generally ignorant public. I’d also neither citizen journalists nor amateurs film frankly enough.

God forbid people record events that will form part of history.
 

Top