• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Avanti take needless announcements to a new level

Vexed

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2020
Messages
637
Location
Herts / Hants
I recently travelled on a Crosscountry train on which there were no automated announcements whatsoever, and the only manual announcements were simple "We're now approaching xxx" from the train manager. It was sheer bliss, and (as far as I know) no-one came to any harm by not being told to take care or to see it, say it, sorted every five minutes.
Quite common on Cross Country, which is nice. Unfortunately the guard yesterday spoke too quietly to make out anything they were saying (I've had the same guard before and this seems to be a regular thing for them).

I'm on an SWR service at the moment and both before and after the crew change the guards have said nothing and left the auto announcer to do it's thing. Much better than them duplicating everything, even if 61016 still gets played.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,075
Location
Wilmslow
Last week I was on a Northern train Wilmslow-Manchester on which no announcements of any sort were made and the display screens said “we are now ariving at Alderley Edge” for the entire journey. Whilst I also loathe the excessive announcements, a complete absence combined with incorrect information is just as bad - I guess it’s a local train for local people and they’re expected to know.
 

Bristol LHS

Member
Joined
29 Sep 2020
Messages
160
Location
Yorkshire
Real classic on todays 1700 Grand Central departure from Kings Cross. The previous Bradford departure had been cancelled, so the train was full and standing with an extra stop added at Doncaster for the Bradford pax to change for West Yorkshire stations.

Conductor made the usual announcements about LNER tickets etc, then announced something on the lines of “As you can see, this train is full and standing, so if you have a non-fare paying child on a seat, or a bag on a seat, you will be asked to pay a full standard fare for that seat. Children under 5 should be on your lap, bags should be on a rack. Seats are for bums not bags. If you want to discuss this, my names X, I’m the senior conductor, come and find me because I’m up for a barney today”. :lol::lol::lol:
 

gabrielhj07

Established Member
Joined
5 May 2022
Messages
1,600
Location
Herts
Why? Do you often get on trains at random with no idea where they're going?
Once, after being awake 25 hours I got on the Jubilee line at Westminster in the wrong direction. Although it was ‘Green Park’ through the window that caught my attention, I was too tired to listen to the announcements!
 

styles

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
4,614
Location
Gwynedd
Once, after being awake 25 hours I got on the Jubilee line at Westminster in the wrong direction. Although it was ‘Green Park’ through the window that caught my attention, I was too tired to listen to the announcements!
Lack of sleep can do wonderful things.

I remember helping out at a weekend event where I got little to no sleep for a few days. I arrived at Sheffield from Derby, then through some weird autopilot I got on a train to Derby to go to work. It was a bank holiday. Had to get off at Chesterfield then go back on myself. That wasn't the fault of absent announcements mind.
 

talldave

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2013
Messages
2,676
It's not about weaponising the language. It's about making the service as inclusive to as many people as possible. Have you tried to travel with a lack of sight?
That's an additional reason that I consider train announcements at stations being overridden by inane housekeeping announcements as a breach of the Equality Act. Clapham Junction being a prime offender.
 

BuhSnarf

Member
Joined
22 May 2010
Messages
713
Location
Leicester
That's an additional reason that I consider train announcements at stations being overridden by inane housekeeping announcements as a breach of the Equality Act. Clapham Junction being a prime offender.
Agree, the important announcements should not be overidden. Of course, everyone's definition of important will differ.
 

318266

Member
Joined
30 Sep 2017
Messages
873
Location
S&W of Alexander Dennis, N&E of Wrightbus
You're not surely suggesting the audible levels are raised to 130dB and announcements tripled to include "approaching stop x" and "departing stop x" and purposefully annoying autistic people to the point of becoming a recluse for those whose only method of transport is bus??

(See how tiring and reductive this style of discourse is? :D)

I don't know the answer. I was just venting

There is a maximum decibel limit (which I believe is 84dB) in the secondary legislation to the Equality Act requiring these.
 

speedy1

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2023
Messages
301
Location
Mossley
Another (new?) one in tpe land: when using the station bins, please sort your rubbish into the correct recycling bin (can't remember exact wording)
 

sheff1

Established Member
Joined
24 Dec 2009
Messages
6,059
Location
Sheffield
At Stockport “The next train at platform 3 is the Avanti to Manchester Piccadilly. You will find a shop in coach C selling delicious hot and cold refreshments”.

Said shop will of course be long closed.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,176
Location
LBK
Agree, the drivel can be reduced. But again you have to imagine that certain basic tasks become harder if you are visually impaired so some things that may appear drivel to us can actually be quite beneficial to someone who has never used a train and suffers with visual difficulties.

For example advertising that there is a buffet (and what products it stocks) can be quite useful if you are visually impaired as this means you can decide whether it's worth you struggling to navigate down the train if you know they serve what you want.
It's really not necessary. There are few other environments would we think that a public space needs to announce loudly on a tannoy there is a coffee machine or ham sandwiches available for sale (you can find out the price when you arrive!) maybe 100 metres away. The real reason the railway does this is due to its ingrained culture, not because it is somehow being very helpful to visually impaired people - who often have other ways of finding out if there is a shop on board their train.

Bearing in mind the number of things that those with disabilities have to put up with or compromise on because the world is setup for able bodied folks I think "being forced" to listen to announcements is an inconvenience we can put up with.
There has to be a balance struck. Some people with disabilities will find trains inaccessible precisely because they are hostile environments owing to the excessive amount of information endlessly being announced, much of which is not vital.
 

BuhSnarf

Member
Joined
22 May 2010
Messages
713
Location
Leicester
It's really not necessary. There are few other environments would we think that a public space needs to announce loudly on a tannoy there is a coffee machine or ham sandwiches available for sale (you can find out the price when you arrive!) maybe 100 metres away. The real reason the railway does this is due to its ingrained culture, not because it is somehow being very helpful to visually impaired people - who often have other ways of finding out if there is a shop on board their train.

There has to be a balance struck. Some people with disabilities will find trains inaccessible precisely because they are hostile environments owing to the excessive amount of information endlessly being announced, much of which is not vital.
I agree, there definitely is a balance to be struck, there is no need to quote the full menu of what flavours of sandwiches are available. However, letting a blind (or anyone with mobility issues) person who has never travelled on this type of train know whether or not the buffet serves hot food does make the difference as to whether they struggle to go down the train.

I'm sure you can imagine that traversing a few carriages of a wobbly, moving train as a blind person is very difficult and if that journey is wasted because the buffet is closed / not serving hot food can be extremely frustrating. Until you've attempted to traverse a train with a disability you probably don't realise how hard that is.

What disability would find a train inaccessible because of announcements? Bearing in mind they will have just traversed a train station with many more announcements? Most people who suffer with sensory overload will utilise some form of ear defenders or high end ANC headphones to block out noise (because they're having to do that ALL DAY every day, not just on trains) so it's likely the announcements will be less of a problem than high pitched shrieks that you'll get from people talking / playing music loudly on a speakerphone.

Of course, the main reason they're doing the buffet announcements, like you say, is not to help those with visual impairments (that is just a by product) but it is in fact to increase sales on the buffet. And as someone who likes that we still have buffets/trolleys I'm all for them drumming up business as if it makes no money we'll lose it!
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,176
Location
LBK
Until you've attempted to traverse a train with a disability you probably don't realise how hard that is.
What would make you assume this is not an experience I have had?

What disability would find a train inaccessible because of announcements? Bearing in mind they will have just traversed a train station with many more announcements?
Some people simply wouldn't be on a train or at a station in the first place because those places are inaccessible to them.

Most people who suffer with sensory overload will utilise some form of ear defenders or high end ANC headphones to block out noise (because they're having to do that ALL DAY every day, not just on trains) so it's likely the announcements will be less of a problem than high pitched shrieks that you'll get from people talking / playing music loudly on a speakerphone.
A lot of people with auditory overload can do this but there are some who can't stand the idea of sitting in silence excluded from the outside world - and nor should people if they don't want to. (Noise cancelling headphones do not block out voices, that's not how they work - ear defenders are more common to use)

If you've had a stroke for example, you can get auditory overload as a result of this. It's not fair or equitable that too few reasonable adjustments are made for people with these types of sensory conditions. Airports manage perfectly fine by having no announcements at all. London City Airport has none whatsoever, for example. These are a good idea for just about everyone. The railway is already starting to recognise that perception of disability is changing because the Disabled Railcard scheme is expanding specifically to accommodate people just like that - who find the railway hostile or inaccessible.

You might say "well what about a visually imparied person in a silent airport?" - the answer is those people are accommodated by airport assistance in exactly the same way they are accommodated by the railway. A visually impaired person who needs to know where the toilet is, or whether there is a buffet car, or how many stops there are until theirs, or where they can put their bags just has to ask - they have to be put on and off the train by a member of staff. There are already mechanisms in place to accommodate them in many circumstances.

Most public spaces do not need 1000 audible announcements about where stuff is. We should keep announcements strictly for announcing what is happening next and consider whether the information is useful. And audio volune is a consideration too.

We could make a great deal of difference by looking at people with hidden or sensory disabilities - of whom there are very many! - and expand and improve how the railway functions as a public space to make it more accessible to them without affecting people with other disabilities.
 
Joined
16 Aug 2017
Messages
454
If they were purely "next stop - High Street" when approaching and "13 to Hades" when the doors open then I don't see much issue.
I'd cut the "next stop -" as well, TfL (and RATP) style. No need for anything more than that unless something out of the ordinary happens. At least buses are currently beyond the reach of BTP sorting. I have been on a Stagecoach bus recently with the irritating (and delaying) stay in your seat message, but later installations seem to have dropped that. But we do get a little fanfare and the reassuring news that "system OK" to wake us up at the last stop.

And from the other thread, rumours of SWR announcement simplification seem to have been greatly exaggerated :'(
 

Skiddaw

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2020
Messages
465
Location
Penrith
At Stockport “The next train at platform 3 is the Avanti to Manchester Piccadilly. You will find a shop in coach C selling delicious hot and cold refreshments”.

Said shop will of course be long closed.
I always struggle with the 'delicious' bit.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
5,934
It's really not necessary. There are few other environments would we think that a public space needs to announce loudly on a tannoy there is a coffee machine or ham sandwiches available for sale (you can find out the price when you arrive!) maybe 100 metres away. The real reason the railway does this is due to its ingrained culture, not because it is somehow being very helpful to visually impaired people - who often have other ways of finding out if there is a shop on board their train.
I'm trying to imagine a pub run by railway management. Obviously there would be no music or juke box, but there would be a PA system. It would go something like this:

"Would all customers please note that hot and cold food is now being served. Please order food at the bar" (possibly read out the menu at this point). "You may pay with cash or contactless cards."
"Would all customers please note that drinks available include beer, cider, wine, spirits, tea, coffee and soft drinks. Please order drinks at the bar. You may pay with cash or contactless cards."
"Customers buying drinks at the bar must use a tray to carry drinks back to their table, to avoid spillage. Any customer seen carrying a drink without using a tray may be removed from the premises."
"In the event of a spillage, the floor near the bar may be wet or slippery. Please be extra careful when walking to and from the bar."
"In wet weather, the floor near the doors may be wet or slippery. Please be extra careful when walking near or through the doors."
"Will all customers please keep their personal possessions with them at all times, and ensure that they take all items with them when they leave the premises."
"Any customers using rude or inappropriate language to staff will be removed from the premises and reported for prosecution."
"This is a security announcement from Bogshire Police. If you see any suspicious activity or unattended items in this pub, please report them to your local police on this number immediately."

Repeat all of the above on a loop every 5 or 10 minutes.

I don't think they'd have many customers :D.
 

speedy1

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2023
Messages
301
Location
Mossley
I'm trying to imagine a pub run by railway management. Obviously there would be no music or juke box, but there would be a PA system. It would go something like this:
...
LOL, brilliant post. It would do a roaring trade with the diabetic-deaf-blind-wheelchair-bound-2-limbed-socially-anxious-95 year-old first time drinkers. We could call the pub the Coddled-Vulnerable Haven

(tongue in cheek, I'm very supportive of the needs of the less able in society. I just feel, sometimes, in some places, such as railway announcements, it's gone too far)
 

BayPaul

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,513
What would make you assume this is not an experience I have had?


Some people simply wouldn't be on a train or at a station in the first place because those places are inaccessible to them.


A lot of people with auditory overload can do this but there are some who can't stand the idea of sitting in silence excluded from the outside world - and nor should people if they don't want to. (Noise cancelling headphones do not block out voices, that's not how they work - ear defenders are more common to use)

If you've had a stroke for example, you can get auditory overload as a result of this. It's not fair or equitable that too few reasonable adjustments are made for people with these types of sensory conditions. Airports manage perfectly fine by having no announcements at all. London City Airport has none whatsoever, for example. These are a good idea for just about everyone. The railway is already starting to recognise that perception of disability is changing because the Disabled Railcard scheme is expanding specifically to accommodate people just like that - who find the railway hostile or inaccessible.

You might say "well what about a visually imparied person in a silent airport?" - the answer is those people are accommodated by airport assistance in exactly the same way they are accommodated by the railway. A visually impaired person who needs to know where the toilet is, or whether there is a buffet car, or how many stops there are until theirs, or where they can put their bags just has to ask - they have to be put on and off the train by a member of staff. There are already mechanisms in place to accommodate them in many circumstances.

Most public spaces do not need 1000 audible announcements about where stuff is. We should keep announcements strictly for announcing what is happening next and consider whether the information is useful. And audio volune is a consideration too.

We could make a great deal of difference by looking at people with hidden or sensory disabilities - of whom there are very many! - and expand and improve how the railway functions as a public space to make it more accessible to them without affecting people with other disabilities.
I'm trying to imagine a pub run by railway management. Obviously there would be no music or juke box, but there would be a PA system. It would go something like this:

"Would all customers please note that hot and cold food is now being served. Please order food at the bar" (possibly read out the menu at this point). "You may pay with cash or contactless cards."
"Would all customers please note that drinks available include beer, cider, wine, spirits, tea, coffee and soft drinks. Please order drinks at the bar. You may pay with cash or contactless cards."
"Customers buying drinks at the bar must use a tray to carry drinks back to their table, to avoid spillage. Any customer seen carrying a drink without using a tray may be removed from the premises."
"In the event of a spillage, the floor near the bar may be wet or slippery. Please be extra careful when walking to and from the bar."
"In wet weather, the floor near the doors may be wet or slippery. Please be extra careful when walking near or through the doors."
"Will all customers please keep their personal possessions with them at all times, and ensure that they take all items with them when they leave the premises."
"Any customers using rude or inappropriate language to staff will be removed from the premises and reported for prosecution."
"This is a security announcement from Bogshire Police. If you see any suspicious activity or unattended items in this pub, please report them to your local police on this number immediately."

Repeat all of the above on a loop every 5 or 10 minutes.

I don't think they'd have many customers :D.
Extremely well said. Most announcements on trains and stations fulfil little or no need for those with a visual impairment, and are just drivel, generally masquerading as health and safety, but achieving nothing, especially as no one actually listens to them any more. No other business would ever do this. GBR need to take a proper axe to announcements, and come up with a simple, effective set of announcements.
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,210
Location
UK
Just NO. There's too many warning signs as it is.
Indeed "too many signs" has been a contributing factor in accidents, lets focus on the important, railway specific information.
 

BuhSnarf

Member
Joined
22 May 2010
Messages
713
Location
Leicester
What would make you assume this is not an experience I have had?
Is it? I haven't stated you have or haven't, merely stated if you have you are likely to have more of an understanding for the issues faced.
Some people simply wouldn't be on a train or at a station in the first place because those places are inaccessible to them.
In which case the point is moot as they are not there.
A lot of people with auditory overload can do this but there are some who can't stand the idea of sitting in silence excluded from the outside world - and nor should people if they don't want to. (Noise cancelling headphones do not block out voices, that's not how they work - ear defenders are more common to use)
Of course, but then if they are in the outside world they will be contending with more than just announcements on a train. If you travel on a train you will likely realise this is only a very small portion of the noise that is experienced. This why I stated ear defenders or high end ANC headphones. High end ANC headphones absolutely will block out or muffle, which for those who don't want to feel isolated is actually a benefit to, human voices.
If you've had a stroke for example, you can get auditory overload as a result of this. It's not fair or equitable that too few reasonable adjustments are made for people with these types of sensory conditions. Airports manage perfectly fine by having no announcements at all. London City Airport has none whatsoever, for example. These are a good idea for just about everyone. The railway is already starting to recognise that perception of disability is changing because the Disabled Railcard scheme is expanding specifically to accommodate people just like that - who find the railway hostile or inaccessible.
You might say "well what about a visually imparied person in a silent airport?" - the answer is those people are accommodated by airport assistance in exactly the same way they are accommodated by the railway. A visually impaired person who needs to know where the toilet is, or whether there is a buffet car, or how many stops there are until theirs, or where they can put their bags just has to ask - they have to be put on and off the train by a member of staff. There are already mechanisms in place to accommodate them in many circumstances.

You're right LCY and Bristol both offer 'silent' terminals, although anyone who has been will know this isn't really the case but they are certainly quieter. For those with visual impairments both airports now recommend that you book for passenger support to help you through the terminal which is great although if you've tried to use it, it's certainly a lot less restrictive than using the terminal independently yourself. You say that a visually impaired person just has to ask for the toilet/buffet etc. Who are they asking? Most visually impaired people don't need help getting on and off a train, they are perfectly capable of doing this.

Most public spaces do not need 1000 audible announcements about where stuff is. We should keep announcements strictly for announcing what is happening next and consider whether the information is useful. And audio volune is a consideration too.
I agree and have said many times that I think overload is just as useless as none at all. But I'm just pointing out what you may find not useful can be useful for others. I think a silent coach where the announcements don't play (or play very quietly) and it's enforced that people don't sit chatting on their phones or scrolling TikTok would be a fantastic idea for those with sensory issues, similar to the hours provided in a supermarket.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
6,169
Extremely well said. Most announcements on trains and stations fulfil little or no need for those with a visual impairment, and are just drivel, generally masquerading as health and safety, but achieving nothing, especially as no one actually listens to them any more. No other business would ever do this. GBR need to take a proper axe to announcements, and come up with a simple, effective set of announcements.
At a station, the Scotrail class 156s say something along the lines of: This is Crossmyloof. This is the Scotrail service to East Kilbride. The next stop is Pollokshaws West. The 318s and 320s are similar. I don't see why anything more is needed.
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
5,021
Why? Do you often get on trains at random with no idea where they're going?
At the risk of repeating myself, without announcement ps how do you expect visually impaired passengers to know when they are arriving at their station?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Extremely well said. Most announcements on trains and stations fulfil little or no need for those with a visual impairment, and are just drivel, generally masquerading as health and safety, but achieving nothing, especially as no one actually listens to them any more. No other business would ever do this. GBR need to take a proper axe to announcements, and come up with a simple, effective set of announcements.
I agree. Which service it is, and the next station as they approach it, are all that is nedded.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

What would make you assume this is not an experience I have had?


Some people simply wouldn't be on a train or at a station in the first place because those places are inaccessible to them.




You might say "well what about a visually imparied person in a silent airport?" - the answer is those people are accommodated by airport assistance in exactly the same way they are accommodated by the railway. A visually impaired person who needs to know where the toilet is, or whether there is a buffet car, or how many stops there are until theirs, or where they can put their bags just has to ask - they have to be put on and off the train by a member of staff. There are already mechanisms in place to accommodate them in many circumstances.
Like other disabled people, those with a visual impairment want to live as independently as possible. My wife, for example, although she needs assistance at unfamiliar stations, can get on and off the train independently at our local station because it is a simple platform layout and she knows the station. What she does, however, need, is to know when the train she is is approaching her station as opposed to having stopped due to signals wtc.

Who wants to have to rely on staff when a simple intervention like announcements can be transformative?
 
Last edited:

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,176
Location
LBK
Like other disabled people, those with a visual impairment want to live as independently as possible. My wife, for example, although she needs assistance at unfamiliar stations, can get on and off the train independently at our local station because it is a simple platform layout and she knows the station. What she does, however, need, is to know when the train she is is approaching her station as opposed to having stopped due to signals wtc.

Who wants to have to rely on staff when a simple intervention like announcements can be transformative?
I'm not arguing for a silent railway, if you read on - you've clipped out the part where I explicitly agree with you! I am just pointing out that the railway does not need an announcement for every single thing as if unique rules apply to it as a public space when there are myriad ways of making services accessible for disabled people who often have competing and conflicting needs.
 

TUC

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
5,021
I'm not arguing for a silent railway, if you read on - you've clipped out the part where I explicitly agree with you! I am just pointing out that the railway does not need an announcement for every single thing as if unique rules apply to it as a public space when there are myriad ways of making services accessible for disabled people who often have competing and conflicting needs.
But it's you said in relation to visually impaired people 'they have to be put on and off the train by a member of staff'.

In terms of competing needs of different disabilities, one which can be mitigated to a degree-such as by using noise cancelling/reducing headphones-must surely be a 2nd order priority to those who cannot mitigate the effects of their disability such as not being able to see?
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,176
Location
LBK
But it's you said in relation to visually impaired people 'they have to be put on and off the train by a member of staff'.
No, I was describing a person who was so severely visually impaired that they would be unable to navigate a train independently. Those people would need to be assisted on and off trains. Not "all visually impaired people" because of course visual impairment (and the ability to cope with the same) is a broad spectrum.

In terms of competing needs of different disabilities, one which can be mitigated to a degree-such as by using noise cancelling/reducing headphones-must surely be a 2nd order priority to those who cannot mitigate the effects of their disability such as not being able to see?
As I've already said, not everyone with sensory disabilities is able to employ those mitigations. Though I'd point out that of course visually impaired people can mitigate their own disability in some cases by using disability aids - a cane or a guide dog, screen reader software or even just magnifying lenses. The fact they employ mitigations doesn't in and of itself mean the disability is more or less worthy of reasonable adjustments.

The goal for disability inclusion is for environments to be designed as far as possible to provide disabled people with an experience as close to that of the able bodied person as possible. Because disabled people generally do not want to, and should not have to, have a balkanised experience which sets them apart from others.

That's why, despite it being cheaper to taxi all wheelchair users to their destination, the railway spends hundreds of millions of pounds and sacrifices capacity to accommodate wheelchair users on trains in comparable conditions. That is perfectly right and just. And it is also why level boarding matters - yes, many people with mobility issues can safely use a mitigation like a ramp or a portable step to get on and off trains, but *why would they want to*?

But in any case we already agree some announcements are so vital for the accessibility needs of visually impaired people that they cannot ever be removed, even if this contributes to the sensory overload of other disabled people. The key of course is balance.
 
Joined
7 Jan 2019
Messages
521
Location
Cheshire
Happily had a rather peaceful journey on Avanti yesterday. Three hours from Crewe to Glasgow and no incessant announcements every five minutes. It was most enjoyable watching the scenery pass by in peace and quiet.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
6,169
But it's you said in relation to visually impaired people 'they have to be put on and off the train by a member of staff'.

In terms of competing needs of different disabilities, one which can be mitigated to a degree-such as by using noise cancelling/reducing headphones-must surely be a 2nd order priority to those who cannot mitigate the effects of their disability such as not being able to see?
Basic stuff, as outlined above, is fine. The problem is that there is now so much pointless noise that I dislike all of it. On a similar note, at Paddington, the assistance vehicles, service vehicles (for restocking trolleys etc.), and the moving gates that allow the above to access the platforms all make a constant beeping sound whenever they move. Between all of them, the beeping is now constant. How is that helpful to anyone, blind or not? In the case of the gates, someone who can see will see the gates moving. For a blind person, how will they know that it's a gate and not a vehicle? What action are they expected to take, given that they cannot know specifically where the gate is or in which direction it will move?
 

Top