• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Train drivers’ decades-long ticket fraud ‘cost taxpayer millions

deltic

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2010
Messages
3,712
This is the headline in today's Daily Telegraph. The article is behind a paywall but what I can see it claims

Nuclear waste transport workers used fake duty rosters to claim free rail journeys

Anyone got access to the full article and or have any insights into what was going on?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

800002

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2019
Messages
1,078
This is the headline in today's Daily Telegraph. The article is behind a paywall but what I can see it claims



Anyone got access to the full article and or have any insights into what was going on?
You may be doing so already, but could you post the weblink?
 

Magicake

Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
130
I had assumed from the headline and opening paragraphs that this was about off-duty drivers.

It wasn't totally clear but after reading to the end I got the understanding that:
- Freight drivers get free train travel when travelling to pick up a train
- Drivers were making use of free travel when travelling for work, but for other purposes than picking up a train
- The examples given were for medicals and meetings

So it seems it is the company and the overall culture more broadly that is breaking the rules rather than individual drivers
 

fishwomp

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2020
Messages
1,271
Location
milton keynes
This is an extract, it does seem to be rather the company (owned in this case by the government), not the drivers themselves who got _no_ benefit from this

Public sector workers have been using fake documents to travel by train without paying in a decades-long fraud, The Telegraph can disclose.

The workers, employed by the Government to transport nuclear waste, used false paperwork so they could take rail journeys without buying a ticket.

The fraud was committed by a number of employees of Nuclear Transport Solutions (NTS), who were employed to drive freight trains full of nuclear waste around the country.

Freight drivers are allowed to take free passenger journeys, using a so-called Freight Travel Duty Pass, if they are on their way to collect a goods train. They must also carry documentary evidence proving this is the purpose of their trip. Other journeys for work purposes must be paid for, with NTS covering reasonable travel expenses.

Fake duty rosters used​

However, some of the 160 drivers – who work for a subsidiary of NTS, Direct Rail Services (DRS) – were supplied with fake duty rosters suggesting they were travelling to pick up a train even when they were not, allowing them to make free journeys illegally.

Whistleblowers have told The Telegraph that the practice was widespread, endorsed by some managers, and went on for decades – potentially cheating taxpayers out of millions of pounds.

Internal documents suggest that an NTS manager freely admitted “knocking up” the duty rosters – known as diagrams in the rail industry – when drivers asked him whether they could be listed as “on duty” for travel to other work meetings.
[..]
 

Farigiraf

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2023
Messages
1,135
Location
Bridge on the River Cam
How much fraud does one have to do to siphon more than £1 million out of the public pot? I wouldn't be surprised if this is another case of typical headine exaggeration - it's not exactly the most unbiased and honest of news providers.
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,290
This is an extract, it does seem to be rather the company (owned in this case by the government), not the drivers themselves who got _no_ benefit from this
Yes I think that is a key distinction to make.
 

800002

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2019
Messages
1,078
Um....
How much fraud does one have to do to siphon more than £1 million out of the public pot? I wouldn't be surprised if this is another case of typical headine exaggeration - it's not exactly the most unbiased and honest of news providers.
I think it soon mounts up very quickly...

Fake duty rosters used
However, some of the 160 drivers – who work for a subsidiary of NTS, Direct Rail Services (DRS) – were supplied with fake duty rosters suggesting they were travelling to pick up a train even when they were not, allowing them to make free journeys illegally.
Whistleblowers have told The Telegraph that the practice was widespread, endorsed by some managers, and went on for decades – potentially cheating taxpayers out of millions of pounds.
Internal documents suggest that an NTS manager freely admitted “knocking up” the duty rosters – known as diagrams in the rail industry – when drivers asked him whether they could be listed as “on duty” for travel to other work
 

fishwomp

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2020
Messages
1,271
Location
milton keynes
How much fraud does one have to do to siphon more than £1 million out of the public pot? I wouldn't be surprised if this is another case of typical headine exaggeration - it's not exactly the most unbiased and honest of news providers.
In this case, it currently syphons it from a government pocket to a government pocket (the article does say DRS is govt owned later). Historically it would have been from private enterprise's pockets - ie. TOCs with franchises with revenue risk, but that kind of TOC doesn't exist today.
 

800002

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2019
Messages
1,078
Considering it  may have started back in 1996, one has to wonder how no one questioned this before.
 

Farigiraf

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2023
Messages
1,135
Location
Bridge on the River Cam
I think it soon mounts up very quickly...
'Millions' in the headline is implying at least 2 million, presumably more. If this has been going on since 1996 - a 30 year period - then that would require around £70,000 a year of fraud to go on. It depends on just how many of the drivers were partaking in this practice (and some drivers will have been doing it far more than others), but if it's become part of the overall culture of the company as suggested by @Magicake, then I'd make an estimate of around 100 drivers a year making use of this 'strategy' - resulting in a rough average of £700 per driver. Most likely a lot fewer drivers than that, so it'll be in the thousands.

Now, I know that rail tickets are expensive, but that's rather high, even over a full year. It likely depends on how far the meetings and medicals actually were - if it's a fairly long distance away from the drivers' homes then I could see it costing over £700 a year, but otherwise I'm sceptical.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

In this case, it currently syphons it from a government pocket to a government pocket (the article does say DRS is govt owned later). Historically it would have been from private enterprise's pockets - ie. TOCs with franchises with revenue risk, but that kind of TOC doesn't exist today.
If this has been going on since 1996, then at least 20 years of the fraud will have been stealing from private TOCs revenue rather than DfTO TOCs. Not an insignificant amount of money still, but when you do a few back-of-the-envelope calculations it does make you realise just how little it's actually made a difference. The real problem is how the company culture managed to get this bad with no intervention.
 

styles

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2014
Messages
4,615
Location
Gwynedd
How much fraud does one have to do to siphon more than £1 million out of the public pot? I wouldn't be surprised if this is another case of typical headine exaggeration - it's not exactly the most unbiased and honest of news providers.
It's £1m spread over 30 years. So that's £33k/year. There's 160 drivers, so if we assume 20% are involved in this, that's a little over £1k per person per year. Assuming they're defrauding flexible tickets like off peak/anytimes, rather than advances, that's not actually hard to tot up.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

As an aside, this is quite a cool map of UK nuclear infrastructure:

1785954524064.png
 

GB

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
6,549
Location
Somewhere
It's £1m spread over 30 years. So that's £33k/year. There's 160 drivers, so if we assume 20% are involved in this, that's a little over £1k per person per year. Assuming they're defrauding flexible tickets like off peak/anytimes, rather than advances, that's not actually hard to tot up.

There is a lot of assumptions there.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,176
Location
LBK
Are these first class fares? The fact one driver insisted on going LNER suggests to me they were after breakfast :lol:
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
16,570
Location
UK
The word 'fraud' implies that there was knowledge that this was wrong. It's possible this could simply be the result of a misunderstanding of how the Duty Card rules worked on behalf of the managers or drivers responsible. A mistaken belief initiated by one or two people, especially at a relatively smaller operator like DRS, could result in a wider culture of people thinking this was acceptable.
 

800002

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2019
Messages
1,078
The word 'fraud' implies that there was knowledge that this was wrong. It's possible this could simply be the result of a misunderstanding of how the Duty Card rules worked on behalf of the managers or drivers responsible. A mistaken belief initiated by one or two people, especially at a relatively smaller operator like DRS, could result in a wider culture of people thinking this was acceptable.
I suppose if the driver was being compensated for the time there were travelling to the work 'engagement', it would be above board.
However, if duty time is only paid for the time I'm attendance at the 'engagement' than one could consider the fraudulent use of the duty roster to obtain the free travel to be calculated.

What were the staff members being paid to do?
 

Acathater

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2025
Messages
655
Location
NorthWest
there's a repost of the article which isn't behind a paywall at

Revealed: Train drivers’ decades-long ticket fraud 'cost taxpayer millions'​

Story by Gareth Corfield

Public sector workers have been using fake documents to travel by train without paying in a decades-long fraud, The Telegraph can disclose.

The workers, employed by the Government to transport nuclear waste, used false paperwork so they could take rail journeys without buying a ticket.

The fraud was committed by a number of employees of Nuclear Transport Solutions (NTS), who were employed to drive freight trains full of nuclear waste around the country.

Freight drivers are allowed to take free passenger journeys, using a so-called Freight Travel Duty Pass, if they are on their way to collect a goods train. They must also carry documentary evidence proving this is the purpose of their trip. Other journeys for work purposes must be paid for, with NTS covering reasonable travel expenses.

However, some of the 160 drivers – who work for a subsidiary of NTS, Direct Rail Services (DRS) – were supplied with fake duty rosters suggesting they were travelling to pick up a train even when they were not, allowing them to make free journeys illegally.

Whistleblowers have told The Telegraph that the practice was widespread, endorsed by some managers, and went on for decades – potentially cheating taxpayers out of millions of pounds.

Internal documents suggest that an NTS manager freely admitted “knocking up” the duty rosters – known as diagrams in the rail industry – when drivers asked him whether they could be listed as “on duty” for travel to other work meetings.

In an interview transcript, the manager said that the practice had been running “since 1996”.

Ticket revenue is paid directly to the government, which then hands a portion of it back to train companies for covering their running costs. Any revenue shortfall is covered by taxpayer subsidy, which last year stood at £12bn.

Richard Holden, the shadow transport secretary, called for a police investigation into the NTS fraud allegations.

He said: “This is beyond belief. Thirty years of what looks like systematic fraud potentially costing millions of pounds to the taxpayer must be investigated by the Government and police.


“It’s clear that train companies must have lost millions of pounds to this over the decades. Nuclear Transport Solutions must commit to repaying its train drivers’ evaded fares in full.”

Department for Transport sources expressed anger when told of the fraud.

The decades-long practice appears to have come to the attention of senior NTS management after one staff member, Driver A, was caught without a diagram or valid ticket by a London North Eastern Railway inspector.

A disciplinary investigation was launched into the driver after the inspector wrote to NTS.

Driver A’s line manager (Manager B) was interviewed as a witness. Neither man can be named for legal reasons.

During that interview, the manager said: “When we send people for medicals, we probably use the Freight Duty Travel Pass.


“It is probably the medicals which are outside of the policy, which have been used like that probably since the RS [Rail Settlement Plan Ltd, which controls the policy] started in 1996, and other freight companies as well.”

Manager B was then asked about two other train drivers who travelled to the same meeting as Driver A. He described one of them as “very particular”, saying: “He asked for a diagram so that he could validate his travel on the London North Eastern Railway, for which I contacted planning and asked them to produce a diagram.

“On the Wednesday night, [the “very particular” driver] messaged and said, ‘I still don’t have a diagram.’ I knocked one up for him that would authorise his travel on the train.

“It shouldn’t be my job, but I did it because he was coming the next day. Those two came up on a diagram that I produced to validate their travel.”


NTS, which is owned by the Government, moves both nuclear fuel and spent nuclear waste around the world. It boasts of having a “100pc nuclear safety record”.

DRS, its train subsidiary, is responsible for moving fuel and spent waste between nuclear power stations and ports. There, NTS-operated ships collect and deliver the atomic material.

Train ticket evasion costs the government-controlled industry around £240m a year, according to figures cited by Lord Hendy, the rail minister.

A DRS spokesman played down the scale of the apparent fraud because when it began in 1996, the company employed far fewer drivers.

The spokesman said: “We take allegations of any wrongdoing seriously and are looking into the matter to establish the facts.

“Given this work is at an early stage, it would be inappropriate to comment further. In the meantime, employees are being reminded of the rules for using the Freight Duty Cards.”


A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesman said: “Even one potential case of fraud is one too many. We fully support Direct Rail Services in investigating this matter.”

[\quote]
 

fishwomp

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2020
Messages
1,271
Location
milton keynes
The word 'fraud' implies that there was knowledge that this was wrong. It's possible this could simply be the result of a misunderstanding of how the Duty Card rules worked on behalf of the managers or drivers responsible. A mistaken belief initiated by one or two people, especially at a relatively smaller operator like DRS, could result in a wider culture of people thinking this was acceptable.
It certainly reads as such - knocking up fake rosters is hardly inadvertent. The driver knows he's not driving, and the manager knows he's not, and that manager is in essence leading this.

Alternative headline if this weren't happening: "railway companies ferry drivers around in taxis due to high rail fares"...
 

800002

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2019
Messages
1,078
Do you think they were prevented from putting a picture of the nuclear flasks in there, so went and defamed Tesco instead?
 

Bodiam

Member
Joined
8 Jul 2025
Messages
105
Location
Kent, UK
In this case, it currently syphons it from a government pocket to a government pocket (the article does say DRS is govt owned later). Historically it would have been from private enterprise's pockets - ie. TOCs with franchises with revenue risk, but that kind of TOC doesn't exist today.
And before that it would have been BR staff travelling on BR business.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,143
Location
Bolton
Considering it  may have started back in 1996, one has to wonder how no one questioned this before.
99% of train conductors will not study a freight duty card or duty authority to travel card closely, unless they believe it is being used by someone other than an authorised person. Same as how they wouldn't closely study a staff leisure card or staff travel card. Revenue might take more interest, but again, beyond checking that it is being used by the correct person, it probably won't be looked into further.

Also, staff travelling in DRS / DBC / Freightliner etc uniform are often passed without even looking at their travel documents. They may also be passed on their company ID if in uniform, and it's just assumed that they are carrying an appropriate freight duty card and schedule card or letter of authority confirming some operational duty.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,657
Location
SW London
Were all the unauthorised journeys made on DRS business, (in which case its DRS defrauding the TOC) or were some of them on personal business or leisure as well?
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,143
Location
Bolton
There is a lot of assumptions there.
Even if it were £2 million over 30 years, that's still less than £300 per business day on average over the whole period. It's clearly not a particularly disproportionate sum given some of these journeys were clearly fairly long.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Were all the unauthorised journeys made on DRS business, (in which case its DRS defrauding the TOC) or were some of them on personal business or leisure as well?
The article implies only duty travel is in question.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
5,934
It seems that this was a government owned company that was avoiding buying tickets, initially from privately owned TOCs, later from government funded TOCs.

So it's hard to see how it cost taxpayers "millions", or indeed anything at all, in fact it might actually have saved taxpayers' money albeit dishonestly. But announcing that presumably wouldn't have fitted the Telegraph's agenda.
 

Top