High Dyke
Established Member
Just another reason not to use or trust those gadgets that are supposed to make your shopping experience quicker.
The pitfalls of self scanners are probably no worse than errors at the checkout. In my experience any reduced items can get charged incorrectly at full price because the new barcode has not been placed correctly (human error). Usually the new bar code sticker does not cover the entirety of some of the bars on the original barcode. That is a problem regardless of checkout, self checkout or self scan.Just another reason not to use or trust those gadgets that are supposed to make your shopping experience quicker.
Main problem is a manually triggered update takes so long that the shelf filler person is wasting time waiting and checking to see if the electronic label has updated after they trigger it. So a personal bar code scanner for me would be convenient - currently if it is something I want to check the price of I go to self scan to scan the item and then abandon. A bit anti-social of me.
Agreed. According to a few explanations and demonstrations in Morrisons shelf edge labels can be updated either way. Either by a push of price changes (overnight apparently) OR by a staff member scanning the product and then scanning the barcode along the bottom edge of the electronic shelf edge label (which seems to have a slow/clunky response rate).There appear to be different types of shelf edge tags, some that require a 'point and shoot' approach to update the display - and others that form a mesh network and allows you to remotely manage them all.
For dynamic pricing you'd need the latter.
They are e Paper based so very similar technology to kindles which means that they do not use any power unless they are actively doing something. This is why the update process seems "clunky" - they will only wake up and update every few minutes to reduce battery usage. The last thing you need is all the batteries needing charging all the while.Agreed. According to a few explanations and demonstrations in Morrisons shelf edge labels can be updated either way. Either by a push of price changes (overnight apparently) OR by a staff member scanning the product and then scanning the barcode along the bottom edge of the electronic shelf edge label (which seems to have a slow/clunky response rate).
For shelf replenishment not necessarily with the same product then point and shoot needs to happen. With the text description of the product being smaller and harder to read on the smaller screens it is easier for the shopper to read the price without checking the description matches !.
On a similar tack, I thought I treat myself to a steak from Sainsbury’s ’Taste the Difference’ range - the pack warned ‘Security Protected’ and there was a large black dongle attached. After going through the checkouts (and having the tag unattached) I trolley’d to the exit - setting of the RF detector alarm. It turns out there’s a patch built in to the label, BUT as it’s hidden, they stick a more visible one on top!
In Tesco these are a bit confusing.the staff member was speculating that it may have picked up the barcode that’s on the bottom of the shelf edge ticket.
I’ve just had that on a bottle of Bollinger. Annoyingly it meant I couldn’t do photos on the socials to show off.Three times now in recent months I’ve bought a bottle with a security thing attached, and got them home still attached (after paying, for clarity!)
I’ve just had that on a bottle of Bollinger. Annoyingly it meant I couldn’t do photos on the socials to show off.
The security tags are pointless anyway, so many random things set the gates off that even the security guards seem to ignore it. Either my Garmin smartwatch or my iPhone sets them off in half the shops I go in.
All those batteries !. I agree they can only really be looking for input every so often.They are e Paper based so very similar technology to kindles which means that they do not use any power unless they are actively doing something. This is why the update process seems "clunky" - they will only wake up and update every few minutes to reduce battery usage. The last thing you need is all the batteries needing charging all the while.
They're not really there to be able to update prices multiple times a day, they're to reduce the need of a colleague (or multiple in big stores) who would spend all day printing, separating and trapsing around the store having to replace labels when prices change.
Crickey, same here - in parts of Croydon.On a slightly different subject, I’m used to security tags on certain products in supermarkets, usually Champagne, certain spirits (albeit not the ones I drink), and more recently some fresh meat products and even large packs of Lurpak.
But I have just seen full security tags on single cans of Red Bull in Tesco.
Oh yes visible deterrent. It is why I had a hulking great semi circular steering wheel lock on my Carlton. To put off those who thought a car of that age did not have an imobiliser. Would not stop a professional thief BUT was to put off those who would otherwise trash the steering lock only to discover the car would not start.On a similar tack, I thought I treat myself to a steak from Sainsbury’s ’Taste the Difference’ range - the pack warned ‘Security Protected’ and there was a large black dongle attached. After going through the checkouts (and having the tag unattached) I trolley’d to the exit - setting of the RF detector alarm. It turns out there’s a patch built in to the label, BUT as it’s hidden, they stick a more visible one on top!
That does seem to be the case.Usually the security device on things like steak etc is a metal coil or NFC tag that can often be small, usually there is a device at the till point which deactivates it, but they are prone to being missed depending on the cashier.
Yes a large part of the issue for Red Bull is under 16s stealing them.Maybe it says something about the type of person that drinks red bull.
It is probably easier to steal a can of red bull than come up against the age restricted products faff - especially if you are young !.
Maybe it says something about the type of person that drinks red bull.
It is probably easier to steal a can of red bull than come up against the age restricted products faff - especially if you are young !.
The issue currently being faced is because energy drinks are currently age restricted and so a teen will just slip one in their coat sleeve rather than attempt to fool the cashier that they're old enough.
Red Bull isn’t currently age restricted by legislation, it is stores implementing their own policies for now.Exactly this.
Government legislation driving cost into retailers
See also tobacco track and trace
This. It's coming into force in England from April next year. Only England though. Maybe youths will take the bus/train from Chester to Shotton to stock up!Red Bull isn’t currently age restricted by legislation, it is stores implementing their own policies for now.
....or Carlisle to Gretna Green!This. It's coming into force in England from April next year. Only England though. Maybe youths will take the bus/train from Chester to Shotton to stock up!
Ah, the modern day equivalent of a runaway marriage. Sharing a can of blue Relentless, how romantic.....or Carlisle to Gretna Green!
People were stealing Red Bull long before the current age focus on energy drinks was a thing.Government legislation driving cost into retailers
People were stealing Red Bull long before the current age focus on energy drinks was a thing.
People steal Red Bull because a) it is very expensive for what it is, and b) it is very easy to steal. No other reason.
But Red Bull isn't actually an age restricted product. Retailers who have put in an age restriction have done it voluntarily. So why are we blaming government for a retailer's commercial decision?My point isn't about theft, its about the Government dealing with the perceived misuse of a stimulant by children by forcing retailers to manage it for them
But Red Bull isn't actually an age restricted product. Retailers who have put in an age restriction have done it voluntarily. So why are we blaming government for a retailer's commercial decision?
Tobacco track and trace has been around for several years now. It isn't new, though I think the penalties have stepped up.Whereas tobacco track and trace on the other hand…..
More widely, it’s *another* set of products that have to be treated differently, and the only one that is actually popular with under 16s.
I think many supermarkets implemented age restriction on energy drinks long before they knew legislation was coming. To some extent the legislation is coming because so many supermarkets already age restricted them that it makes sense all stores should be.Because they all know the legislation is coming and there have been a lot of off the record conversations with industry groups and leaders
This isn't a new thing? Many products have been age restricted for a long time. Also I would blame bad parenting more than the government, if parents educated and looked after children better the government wouldn't intervene.its about the Government dealing with the perceived misuse of a stimulant by children by forcing retailers to manage it for them
This isn't a new thing? Many products have been age restricted for a long time
Tobacco track and trace has been around for several years now. It isn't new, though I think the penalties have stepped up.
And, let's be honest here, it has only come about as the direct result of the widespread sale of counterfeit or illegally imported tobacco by retailers.