Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Hence the train shouldn’t be advertised too much for being advanced, they should let the public notice after experiencing the difference the train makes.
I've never been a fan of describing as "futuristic" stuff that exists today. If it exists today, it's not the future.
The 2024 Stock will still be a massive improvement though. Just not from the future.
I think it is fair to call it high tech for what this train can/has achieved relative to previous stock. The people saying it is outdated compared to Asian metros seem to be a pessimistic and vocal minority. London Underground is by no means perfect and could do with quite a few upgrades, but the 2024 stock is definitely a step in the right direction.
Also a pet peeve of mine is people calling the LCD screens ‘LED screens’, shame to see the BBC do it as well. Funnily enough, dot matrix displays actually fit into the LED display umbrella better than the LCDs in newer stations and trains.
I don't see why it would be outdated compared to Asian metros. Siemens know what they're doing and they've always been at the forefront of train development and innovation. It's not for nothing the Chinese have spent decades spying and copying Europe. A bit easy to now say they're ahead of us (which they're not, in most aspects).
I don't see why it would be outdated compared to Asian metros. Siemens know what they're doing and they've always been at the forefront of train development and innovation. It's not for nothing the Chinese have spent decades spying and copying Europe. A bit easy to now say they're ahead of us (which they're not, in most aspects).
Agreed on this, I think most of the people looking down on the 2024 stock and claiming older trains in Asia are better don’t know a thing about engineering. I also wouldn’t be surprised if they think having more LCDs and different temperatures across carriages make the train high-tech.
I think it is fair to call it high tech for what this train can/has achieved relative to previous stock. The people saying it is outdated compared to Asian metros seem to be a pessimistic and vocal minority. London Underground is by no means perfect and could do with quite a few upgrades, but the 2024 stock is definitely a step in the right direction.
Also a pet peeve of mine is people calling the LCD screens ‘LED screens’, shame to see the BBC do it as well. Funnily enough, dot matrix displays actually fit into the LED display umbrella better than the LCDs in newer stations and trains.
Agreed on this, I think most of the people looking down on the 2024 stock and claiming older trains in Asia are better don’t know a thing about engineering. I also wouldn’t be surprised if they think having more LCDs and different temperatures across carriages make the train high-tech.
Footage from TFL showing train arriving at South Kensington it’s gonna be really interesting to see how the trains stop in the tunnel section as the some of the platforms are shorter the train. The "24" stock stopping diamonds have been installed in most stations, so if you stood at the...
www.railforums.co.uk
Air-con? Walk-through carriages? The Glasgow subway has both despite a tighter gauge and smaller trains. IMO, the Glasgow subway trains look sleeker and more futuristic. The 2024 stock still looks old fashioned because of its 90s-era livery.
I think it was a big mistake to market the train as futuristic or high tech as it looks like a normal tube train to the non train enthusiast. It’s probably a train that doesn’t need a huge announcement if how new or better it is, non train enthusiasts just need to experience the train over time to appreciate it.
Sure us train enthusiasts know it’s high tech and that high tech isn’t just about screen or information technology, like the commentators seem to think it is.
I agree. They are just replacement trains (and years overdue). Of course they are an improvement but that's hardly exceptional or unexpected when replacing a 50 years old junk.
That is problem with London. We are spinning stock replacement as some amazing transformative investment.
Investment would be building new lines and stations. How many stations are under construction? How many kilometres of new lines are being build? Of the Underground, DLR or trams?
Footage from TFL showing train arriving at South Kensington it’s gonna be really interesting to see how the trains stop in the tunnel section as the some of the platforms are shorter the train. The "24" stock stopping diamonds have been installed in most stations, so if you stood at the...
www.railforums.co.uk
Air-con? Walk-through carriages? The Glasgow subway has both despite a tighter gauge and smaller trains. IMO, the Glasgow subway trains look sleeker and more futuristic. The 2024 stock still looks old fashioned because of its 90s-era livery.
I prefer the 24 stocks design to the Glasgow subway trains. PMSM hasn’t been used on metro trains outside of Asia, from what I know. But I know it’s used in ev cars as well.
24 stock doesn’t look old fashioned to me but I do think London Underground is stuck with 90’s era design because that’s when they made big changes to their liveries and train design.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I agree. They are just replacement trains (and years overdue). Of course they are an improvement but that's hardly exceptional or unexpected when replacing a 50 years old junk.
That is problem with London. We are spinning stock replacement as some amazing transformative investment.
Investment would be building new lines and stations. How many stations are under construction? How many kilometres of new lines are being build? Of the Underground, DLR or trams?
Yeah I suspect the 24 stock would be blamed for delays just because the signalling isn’t going to also be invested in at the same time as the trains. Just like people, non train enthusiasts, actually associate new trains with being less reliable just because of old infrastructure.
I see the 24 stock as advanced but I know most just see it as a newer train hence that is how it should’ve been shown.
Wouldn’t it be more correct to say that the new Elizabeth line stations in the core and the Heathrow branch have LCD screens, the others have dot matrix LED screens? At least to me, LED screens imply I can see the individual LEDs and therefore can only display text as is the case with dot matrix displays. On the other extreme, the newer LED screens used for billboards and train departure boards are too massive and bright.
Footage from TFL showing train arriving at South Kensington it’s gonna be really interesting to see how the trains stop in the tunnel section as the some of the platforms are shorter the train. The "24" stock stopping diamonds have been installed in most stations, so if you stood at the...
www.railforums.co.uk
Air-con? Walk-through carriages? The Glasgow subway has both despite a tighter gauge and smaller trains. IMO, the Glasgow subway trains look sleeker and more futuristic. The 2024 stock still looks old fashioned because of its 90s-era livery.
The two biggest factors for me are the floating cars and air conditioning. I know floating cars have been used on other rail systems, but I think this is one of the first times it is used in a high-intensity metro environment. It is especially impressive since it removes the need to have single leaf doors at carriage ends, something that has plagued deep Tube stock since forever. As for aircon, I know Glasgow has managed to fit it under the train in a small tunnel before London. However, the Piccadilly line has an extra challenge of having roughly half its route above ground, leaving plenty of time for the train to be heated up. This is why the Central line 1992TS needs tinted windows whilst the W&C don’t. Of course, we will need to see whether the aircon can hold up against the hottest of days, but if it can keep up with the S stock this will be impressive.
Wouldn’t it be more correct to say that the new Elizabeth line stations in the core and the Heathrow branch have LCD screens, the others have dot matrix LED screens? At least to me, LED screens imply I can see the individual LEDs and therefore can only display text as is the case with dot matrix displays. On the other extreme, the newer LED screens used for billboards and train departure boards are too massive and bright.
The two biggest factors for me are the floating cars and air conditioning. I know floating cars have been used on other rail systems, but I think this is one of the first times it is used in a high-intensity metro environment. It is especially impressive since it removes the need to have single leaf doors at carriage ends, something that has plagued deep Tube stock since forever. As for aircon, I know Glasgow has managed to fit it under the train in a small tunnel before London. However, the Piccadilly line has an extra challenge of having roughly half its route above ground, leaving plenty of time for the train to be heated up. This is why the Central line 1992TS needs tinted windows whilst the W&C don’t. Of course, we will need to see whether the aircon can hold up against the hottest of days, but if it can keep up with the S stock this will be impressive.
Would it be possible that they weren’t using the right terminology? I think for most passenger information systems around the world, the typed used in the Elizabeth line core would be classed as LCD, not LED. The Japan section of this Wikipedia article shows what I mean. And I would certainly refer to these kinds of panels in computers and monitors as ‘LCD’ not ‘LED’. However, I will stand corrected if anything that can display an image is simply called 'LED screen' in the rail industry.
There is indeed good logic in using 24 stock on the Central line; both trains and signals being Siemens will aid the integration.
Unfortunately the timescales to take up the option on the 24 stock contract does not seem to match the late 2030's timescale for the signalling being ready.
Also the complexity of modifying the Picc & Bak lines infrastructure to accommodate the 24 train design is becoming clearer - so this may also be a factor for the use of this design on other lines.
Why would they replace the Central Line trains so soon after refurbishment? Judging by the state of current TFL funding, it may be decades after CLIP is completed (unless it completely fails). 1973 stock refurbishment was completed in 2001, and 24 stock is entering service about 25 years after that.
LED screens are displays that are made up of an array of LEDs. They are not a continuous panel, so typically can't be used to form images like an LCD display. On the railway you usually find these as dot matrix displays (I'll include an image below).
LCD screens are liquid crystal displays. They're a type of continuous display panel that use liquid crystals and polarisers to emit and modulate light, and can make images. You'd find an LCD in early iPhones (modern ones use OLED displays), TVs, and computer monitors. On the railway, you'd usually find these as more modern displays, like in the Thameslink core or onboard Aventras.
The 92 stock was LUL's first train which used a lot of electronics/microprocessors and was value engineered, so has a lot of issues which limit it's useful life, CLIP addresses the worst but not all.
The type in this image is actually also an LED Array Display similar to a dot-matrix, just a more modern version with smaller, coloured, dimmable LEDs that can show a much wider arrange of pictures than just plain monochrome text. Basically most large displays like this (particularly advertising billboards or the big screens you get at concerts or sports stadiums) just use this more modern version of high-resolution colour dot-matrix LED displays. If you go up close enough to it, you'll still be able to see each pixel is an individual LED.
An example of an LCD display used in rail would be the sort of TFT LCD displays used as platform indicators installed more recently on the Abellio (or ex Abellio) franchises like Greater Anglia and West Midlands Trains (see photo below), which are essentially just bigger or more specialised versions of regular TFT LCD displays you'd find in your TV or computer monitor. The displays both in the Elizabeth Line core (and at Heathrow), onboard Elizabeth Line 345s and those being used onboard the 24 stock are similarly LCD displays (albeit potentially backlit with LEDs, hard to say).
In short, no. Not really. There were some ideal timelines when it may have actually been likely to have gained funding within a few years of (or at the same time as) the 24 stock being introduced, but it's not got any funding as of yet and to be honest I'd be very surprised if it does get funded within the next 5 years at the very least.
Why would they replace the Central Line trains so soon after refurbishment? Judging by the state of current TFL funding, it may be decades after CLIP is completed (unless it completely fails). 1973 stock refurbishment was completed in 2001, and 24 stock is entering service about 25 years after that.
I believe that was a conscious decision that it was better to have one type of train on all sub-surface lines (S stock), at the cost of withdrawing D78 before it was fully life-expired (although it was already quite dated), rather than have two mixed stocks on the SSL if the District received different new trains later.
the D Stock refurbishment was scaled back to mostly just saloon cosmetics, rather than mechanical or electrical work.
The cab desk remained the same and not altered as promised. Air cooling was installed however.
Overall, these are the recent/planned gaps between the completion of the last refurbishment and the start of withdrawal. So the median is about 14 years
Form over function as always. This is why car manufacturers are having a whale of a time selling cars more expensive than ever even though they're not necessarily more expensive to build -- it's got screens and ambient lighting everywhere, wow it's really premium ! thinks the customer, when it's actually cheaper to make (and obviously develop) than car interiors from, say 20 years ago, when there were actual materials in there.
An interesting analogy. The sums then suggested replacement offered savings over the additional logistics cost of a mixed fleet. I'd love to know how they costed mass obsolescence at the 30-50 year point though versus replacing approximately 35-40% (unsure of the exact figures) after 10-15 years.
I believe that was a conscious decision that it was better to have one type of train on all sub-surface lines (S stock), at the cost of withdrawing D78 before it was fully life-expired (although it was already quite dated), rather than have two mixed stocks on the SSL if the District received different new trains later.
the D Stock refurbishment was scaled back to mostly just saloon cosmetics, rather than mechanical or electrical work.
The cab desk remained the same and not altered as promised. Air cooling was installed however.
Isn't the dot matrix boards that were located inside the carriages and the side windows technically considered as electrical work or would you still class that as cosmetics?
It would also help if the BBC doesn't make up terms too and present their opinion of them (ie "Futuristic", "High Tech") as a widely regarded fact in the title.
And the people commenting are clueless.
I thought LCD displays were a thing of the past, didn’t the 1973TS refurb the 1995/96TS and originally the 1992TS use unreliable yellow segment for their exterior LCD destination indicators? They were unreliable and especially on the 1992TS, being replaced by LED displays form the mid to late 1990s. Tube Lines replaced the examples on the 73,95 and 96TS. The Networker trains also had green segment LCD displays, they were replaced again with LED ones akin to the 1992TS, the LCD segment displays deteriorated quickly, I recall it was due to sunlight degrading the segments?
Do the Aventra trains and pretty much everything else have TV style displays? What type of displays are they?
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
With the 2009TS about 15 years older than the 2024TS by the time it finally enters service, the contrast of modernity will be immense. I find the 2009TS quite similar externally to the 2024TS, the shape of the door windows and the front is somewhat reminiscent, of course the 2024TS is much more modern and looks a better train than the 09 Stock. I fear the 09 Stock may have an early replacement as it will seem so old and outdated once 2024TS is rolled out across the entire deep level lines in the next 10 to 20 years. The lack of walkthrough carriages and outdated scrolling DMI indicators and more importantly air conditioning, will make the carriages stand out like a sore thumb compared to the 2024TS or similar varieties.
I find the 2009TS quite similar externally to the 2024TS, the shape of the door windows and the front is somewhat reminiscent, of course the 2024TS is much more modern and looks a better train than the 09 Stock. I fear the 09 Stock may have an early replacement as it will seem so old and outdated once 2024TS is rolled out across the entire deep level lines in the next 10 to 20 years. The lack of walkthrough carriages and outdated scrolling DMI indicators and more importantly air conditioning, will make the carriages stand out like a sore thumb compared to the 2024TS or similar varieties.
I thought LCD displays were a thing of the past, didn’t the 1973TS refurb the 1995/96TS and originally the 1992TS use unreliable yellow segment for their exterior LCD destination indicators? They were unreliable and especially on the 1992TS, being replaced by LED displays form the mid to late 1990s. Tube Lines replaced the examples on the 73,95 and 96TS. The Networker trains also had green segment LCD displays, they were replaced again with LED ones akin to the 1992TS, the LCD segment displays deteriorated quickly, I recall it was due to sunlight degrading the segments?
Do the Aventra trains and pretty much everything else have TV style displays? What type of displays are they?
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
With the 2009TS about 15 years older than the 2024TS by the time it finally enters service, the contrast of modernity will be immense. I find the 2009TS quite similar externally to the 2024TS, the shape of the door windows and the front is somewhat reminiscent, of course the 2024TS is much more modern and looks a better train than the 09 Stock. I fear the 09 Stock may have an early replacement as it will seem so old and outdated once 2024TS is rolled out across the entire deep level lines in the next 10 to 20 years. The lack of walkthrough carriages and outdated scrolling DMI indicators and more importantly air conditioning, will make the carriages stand out like a sore thumb compared to the 2024TS or similar varieties.
I think the only thing that might lead to early retirement of 09 stock is the over heated train and failed cooling system. But I think the overheating is also an infrastructural problem mainly.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Overall, these are the recent/planned gaps between the completion of the last refurbishment and the start of withdrawal. So the median is about 14 years
Woah, hold on there! The 72 stock for me has been going 30+ years in its refurbished form. The 2018 works from at least a cosmetic POV have barely changed anything and the current RVAR works are by no means a refurbishment.
IMO we haven't seen a "proper" refurbishment on LU since the d78 themselves were completed. You could argue the 92 CLIP project may just qualify though...
Woah, hold on there! The 72 stock for me has been going 30+ years in its refurbished form. The 2018 works from at least a cosmetic POV have barely changed anything and the current RVAR works are by no means a refurbishment.
IMO we haven't seen a "proper" refurbishment on LU since the d78 themselves were completed. You could argue the 92 CLIP project may just qualify though...
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.