RichJF
Member
That's going to be a magnet for graffiti & anti-ICE slogans when in the yard.
I thought that was a joke until I Googled it. As is so often the case with that administration.One of the Nextgen Acela power cars has been wrapped in a vinyl commemorating USA 250. It's not been done in a tasteful fashion though, it's very cringey. "1776 National Champs", a picture of the Statue of Liberty (something the French should have repossessed by now), and emblazoned down the side "Delivered by President Donald J. Trump and Secretary Sean P. Duffy".
I think that's very nice indeed. I suspect some on this thread wouldn't approve of the stars and stripes in any format on a train.Just the other week Union Pacific have unveiled a new livery for one of their diesel locomotives, being painted in a white livery with the USA flag and "Donald Trump" written on the side, ahead of the Artemis III space programme. It's indicated the loco will then do duties to carry the space rocket's components.
![]()
I think that's very nice indeed. I suspect some on this thread wouldn't approve of the stars and stripes in any format on a train.
I see since I started typing this an Acela power car is next for criticism. I see nothing wrong with that either, but then I don't think a bit of national pride is a bad thing. It's quite likely that political thought is factor in reactions here. If I was American I'd probably be a Republican voter, despite some of Trump's flaws. He's just the incumbent president. I think Starmer also has a silly haircut, but I wouldn't not vote Labour because of it.
In this country we've had liveries honouring the military, monarchy and probably other national institutions. Should we not have?
It’s the blatant politicisation of it that people are objecting to, not the use of the stars and stripes.I think that's very nice indeed. I suspect some on this thread wouldn't approve of the stars and stripes in any format on a train.
I see since I started typing this an Acela power car is next for criticism. I see nothing wrong with that either, but then I don't think a bit of national pride is a bad thing. It's quite likely that political thought is factor in reactions here. If I was American I'd probably be a Republican voter, despite some of Trump's flaws. He's just the incumbent president. I think Starmer also has a silly haircut, but I wouldn't not vote Labour because of it.
In this country we've had liveries honouring the military, monarchy and probably other national institutions. Should we not have?
I am 100% in favour of patriotic liveries when applied tastefully and classily. The problem with much current US "patriotic" display etc is that it is a bit cringe and tacky (and honouring a president who has not been very successful in his key objectives so far). Much the same as I would favour naming a train after, say Lord Nelson with a tasteful union flag inspired livery but not after, say Boris Johnson/Keir Starmer with AI putting awkward union flags all over the side.I think that's very nice indeed. I suspect some on this thread wouldn't approve of the stars and stripes in any format on a train.
I see since I started typing this an Acela power car is next for criticism. I see nothing wrong with that either, but then I don't think a bit of national pride is a bad thing. It's quite likely that political thought is factor in reactions here. If I was American I'd probably be a Republican voter, despite some of Trump's flaws. He's just the incumbent president. I think Starmer also has a silly haircut, but I wouldn't not vote Labour because of it.
In this country we've had liveries honouring the military, monarchy and probably other national institutions. Should we not have?
As it happens, the stars and stripes doesn't lend itself to being tastefully applied to objects like the Union Flag does. Note how well a Red Arrows Hawk carries the Union Flag but the Thunderbirds barely make a nod to the flag and the Blue Angels don't bother trying.I think that's very nice indeed. I suspect some on this thread wouldn't approve of the stars and stripes in any format on a train.
Have you actually seen the power car in question?I see since I started typing this an Acela power car is next for criticism. I see nothing wrong with that either, but then I don't think a bit of national pride is a bad thing.
Winston Churchill did get a Bulleid Pacific named after him (though as a wartime leader he was popular across party lines). Palmerston at the Ffestiniog Railway is named after the PM who was in office when the loco was built. The LBSCR named one after Gladstone too.We've not had them honouring political leaders though (not living ones anyway).
Winston Churchill did get a Bulleid Pacific named after him (though as a wartime leader he was popular across party lines). Palmerston at the Ffestiniog Railway is named after the PM who was in office when the loco was built. The LBSCR named one after Gladstone too.
Nothing wrong with the concept, lots can go wrong with the execution. The Acela one is cringe and a barometer of bad taste. The white loco is actually not bad at all.I think that's very nice indeed. I suspect some on this thread wouldn't approve of the stars and stripes in any format on a train.
I see since I started typing this an Acela power car is next for criticism. I see nothing wrong with that either, but then I don't think a bit of national pride is a bad thing. It's quite likely that political thought is factor in reactions here. If I was American I'd probably be a Republican voter, despite some of Trump's flaws. He's just the incumbent president. I think Starmer also has a silly haircut, but I wouldn't not vote Labour because of it.
In this country we've had liveries honouring the military, monarchy and probably other national institutions. Should we not have?
Interesting that one can make unsubstantiated statements such as this, presumably based on Twitter/X posts which of course are a reliable source of information. I wonder if similar such posts about British politicians would survive the moderators. But it seems any slur against the US and its president are fair game here.I'm not sure that being a corrupt paedophile rapist who is embezzling billions of dollars while causing inflation to rocket by bombing Iran is quite comparable to "a silly haircut" as flaws go.
Interesting that one can make unsubstantiated statements such as this, presumably based on Twitter/X posts which of course are a reliable source of information. I wonder if similar such posts about British politicians would survive the moderators. But it seems any slur against the US and its president are fair game here.
Although I do agree having the Presidents' name on the Acela wrap is cringeworthy. I would feel the same if it were Biden's or Harris' name.
Many people have been mislead over the so-called "insurrection" of January 6 but this is not the time nor the place to discuss it. Essentially it was a manufactured event by the Left designed to discredit conservatives and it succeeded.Well, he's certainly causing a lot of inflation here and in the US due to his war of choice in Iran.
His direct support of insurrectionists who attempted to overthrow the elected government in 2020 (both by pardoning them as well as attempting to set up a slush fund) looks pretty corrupt to me (if not outright treasonous).
Many people have been mislead over the so-called "insurrection" of January 6 but this is not the time nor the place to discuss it. Essentially it was a manufactured event by the Left designed to discredit conservatives and it succeeded.
I just find it amazing this criticism of US politics and leaders from Britain of all places, given the sorry state that my former homeland has become.
Hmm, Pot meet Kettle.Particularly when we have clueless slimy pillocks like Vance weighing in on our domestic issues.
Yes, in 1946 his name was applied to a Battle of Britain class loco, along with the names of various senior RAF officers, airfields, squadrons and aircraft. The loco was later used to haul his funeral train and is now preserved in the NRM.I hadn't realised Sir Winston had one named after him while he was still alive. As you say though, he wasn't any old PM.
Which bit was untrue?Interesting that one can make unsubstantiated statements such as this
Hmm, Pot meet Kettle.
I should note that contrary to the opinions Expressed above I am not a kool-aid drinking, MAGA hat wearing supporter of the President. I was against the war in Iran and am particularly concerned about the lack of support of passenger rail by the administration. However there are important issues for which the change of administration in 2024 was a breath of fresh air. I realize it is hard for those living elsewhere only getting news filtered by their domestic news organizations that have their own agendas to see what is really going on. Against this, the fact that we have locomotives with silly wraps that aggrandize people in the administration seem trivial by comparison.
Here in the US I see China as the primary enemy. Russia may be more of a threat to Europe, although given how they have been stalemated in the Ukraine it hasn't exactly shown off their military prowess. Maybe more of a threat economically since they can shut off gas supplies etc.Aside from the American domestic politics, everything Trump does emboldens our primary enemy, Russia. That's what's really going on.
Here in the US I see China as the primary enemy. Russia may be more of a threat to Europe, although given how they have been stalemated in the Ukraine it hasn't exactly shown off their military prowess. Maybe more of a threat economically since they can shut off gas supplies etc.
We've not had them honouring political leaders though (not living ones anyway).
Can you imagine loco's being named after Tony Blair or Mrs Thatcher !
There's something almost beautifully grotesque to these businesses pandering to the Stalinist-like Trumpian personality cult. On the railway side, there's still some margin though - Stalin had a whole class of locomotives names after him.