• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Penalty fare notice - card blocked by TfL

jumble

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2011
Messages
1,483
Good afternoon all

I'm hoping for some advice regarding two penalty fares I have been issued with, both given because the revenue inspector's card reader showed that my card was blocked by TfL.

14th April - I travelled on the return leg of my commute from St James' Park tube to Victoria tube, and then from Victoria station to Shortlands (I do this journey twice a week). I used the card on my ApplePay Express Travel function to touch in and touch out on the tube, and again to touch in at Victoria before boarding the train. On the train there was a Southeastern revenue inspection, and my card came up on the reader as being blocked by TfL. I was pretty shocked at this because I had been using this payment method for months with no issues on tapping and out (single beeps and green lights all the time), but complied with the inspection and was issued with the PFN. I asked the inspector how I could have entered the ticket barrier at Victoria if the card was blocked, as presumably the gates wouldn't have opened, and he was unable to explain this.

When I got home I called TfL who confirmed there was no block on the card and no outstanding charges or unpaid fares on my account. I looked back over my journey history since July 2025 when I started using this card, and the only anomaly I can see is an incident in January 2026 where I forgot to touch out at Shortlands, but TfL had auto-corrected it based on my journey history and deducted the correct fare. I sent off an appeal citing the above and providing screenshots of the journey history for that day and for the 3 months prior showing no history of unpaid fares, failure to tap in/out etc.

28th April - Stupidly, I carried on using the ApplePay card to pay for my travel for the next couple of weeks, since TfL had confirmed there was no block on it, and was issued with another PFN by Southeastern on 28th April when I was leaving Shortlands, again with the card reader showing the card was blocked. Again, I had been travelling with no issue, getting single beeps and green lights, barriers opening etc, no indication that there was any restriction on my travel. Again, the inspector could not explain how I had been allowed through the barriers with a card which was supposedly blocked. Again, TfL have confirmed there is no block. Again, I have sent off an appeal citing similar grounds to the first one.

I've now received back the first level appeal decision on the 14th April PFN, rejecting the appeal on the grounds that my card had not been validated before boarding the train, which is (a) incorrect and (b) not even the reason the PFN was issued in the first place! I will be appealing this to the second assessor, and am still awaiting the outcome of the 28th April PFN first level appeal, but would greatly appreciate any advice in the meantime. I found the below thread from last year which is very similar to my situation, and posters there have mentioned that the card reader may contain an out of date list of blocked cards - I'm not aware of my card having ever been blocked, but I suppose it could have happened without me being aware of it? Or can the data sometimes just be wrong rather than old?

https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/appealing-penalty-fare-notice-contactless-card-“declined-by-issuer”.287648/

Ironically, on 30th April I had a revenue inspection from TfL, not Southeastern, and there was no problem at all, but I've since started using an Oystercard to pay for my travel because I'm worried about future inspections.

I've attached the 14th April PFN and my journey history for that day

Thanks very much for looking
May I ask if you have anything in writing from TFL confirming that your card was not blocked as i think that this would help enormously in enabling the appeals chaps to understand.
You could also ask the appeals people exactly how you would be expected to find out if the card had been blocked even if it had been
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

[.n]

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2016
Messages
759
It's no different to a passenger presenting one physical card at the gate and a different one to the inspection. Setting a different default card for normal transactions and for express transit is an extremely unusual thing to do and there should be no expectation on TfL to accommodate such niche use cases, particularly when the passenger can simply select the correct card when presenting their device for inspection.
Why is it a niche case? I have a number of cards in my Samsung Pay, and my default express travel card is indeed different to my normal day to day one. An inspection device should read the correct option
 

TigerCap

Member
Joined
12 May 2026
Messages
15
Location
Bromley
Did you present your phone for inspection or the contactless card linked via Applepay. I'm no expert but I believe if you present the physical card when using Express travel mode it won't be recognised. Did you send your journey history with your appeal, if not download your history as you can only go back six weeks ( I think)
Hi, thanks for replying. I presented my phone for inspection, not the physical linked card, as I had used the phone to tap in at Victoria. I know it's not interchangeable and they have different journey histories - I've only used the physical card once this year for a bus journey in January and prior to that not since October 2025 as it's easier to use the phone rather than get my wallet out. I've gone back as far as I can with the journey history of the physical card and can't see any unpaid fares or unfinished journeys.

I do have two contactless cards on my phone, from two different bank accounts - personal and joint. I was using the personal one as my Express Travel card until November 2025 when I switched it to the joint one.

I sent three months worth of journey history with the appeal for February, March and April 2026.
 

Adam Williams

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2018
Messages
3,498
Location
Warks
An inspection device should read the correct option
I find it remarkable that we are having to defend this point - which should be bloody obvious - to be honest.

I think for some posters here, the industry can do no wrong.
 
Last edited:

Adam Williams

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2018
Messages
3,498
Location
Warks
Thanks for replying - my default card on my phone for non-travel payments is my personal account. The default card for travel is my joint account card

When you asked TfL:

When I got home I called TfL who confirmed there was no block on the card

Which card did you ask them about? The joint account, or the personal account card?
 

TigerCap

Member
Joined
12 May 2026
Messages
15
Location
Bromley
This is an interesting case. Did the revenue inspection device confirm what it thought the card number was at any point in the process? It's a bit stupid it's not (at least partially redacted) printed on the PFN.



Presumably RID2 and any other inspection devices all implement this extension in order to trigger the Express Travel Card, and it is known to work reliably - anyone know?
Thanks for replying. I can't see any reference on the PFN to the card number. When I first presented my phone to the device there was a negative-sounding beep (can't think of another way to describe it!) so I'm pretty sure I then went into my Apple Wallet and selected the right card, as I thought at first I'd presented the old personal account card that I used to travel with which would obviously throw up an alert.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

When you asked TfL:



Which card did you ask them about? The joint account, or the personal account card?
The joint account card. The personal account card was never registered with them so there is no journey history I can look up, although I assume if I did register it now I could see anything outstanding which might have caused the alert? TfL confirmed that there was no block on either the physical joint account card, or the digital version on my phone. Both cards have always said "ready to travel" when I've logged into my contactless account.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Agreed with post #7.

And if the running hypothesis was true, then surely we would be seeing incomplete journey charges if you used express travel (at the start of your journey) and then double tapped the power button for your 'true' contactless card at the end of your journey?

Even if they do have different numbers, there must be something done by TfL to avoid the above.

To the OP, I'm wondering if any of these inspections are reflecting on https://contactless.tfl.gov.uk/ ?

And in your next appeal I would collect your reference ID for your card (can be found at website linked above). Since this proves when you tapped in, and out, which can be cross-checked with the time the penalty fare was issued, and provided you've explained all you have here
.... but it sometimes takes until the 3rd round of appeals to get somewhere.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


You are correct in saying this, though

We have seen some complaints on this forum about customers who expected to be able to validate their payment card during inspection when their phone had died, as they were able to enter the network using express mode
Thanks for replying. Neither of the two inspections (14th April and 28th April) are showing on my contactless journey history. What is showing is the revenue inspection I had on 30th April which I think was TfL not Southeastern, although the inspector didn't formally identify herself. That just says "Your card was checked by a revenue inspector", and gives the time and date. The inspection itself was all fine and she had no problems.

To answer the point above, the phone had plenty of battery during both inspections and wasn't in express mode.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

May I ask if you have anything in writing from TFL confirming that your card was not blocked as i think that this would help enormously in enabling the appeals chaps to understand.
You could also ask the appeals people exactly how you would be expected to find out if the card had been blocked even if it had been
Thanks for replying. I don't have anything in writing from TfL, but I did get the name of the operator and a call reference number, which I sent off with my first round appeal for the 14th April check. This doesn't seem to have been looked at as Penalty Services have rejected the first round appeal, but I will send it in again with the second round.
 
Last edited:

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,479
The personal account card was never registered with them so there is no journey history I can look up,
You could register the card to see (I believe) the usage for the previous 12 months.
 

TigerCap

Member
Joined
12 May 2026
Messages
15
Location
Bromley
I note that some posters have suggested that the card reader may be picking up on my personal account card, and not the joint account card. As @[.n] said above, you would think the reader could identify which card has been used to travel since it's not unusual to have multiple cards in the wallet, although I'm pretty sure each time I've been inspected I have taken care to bring up the correct card in my Apple Wallet and double click the side button. Presumably even if Card A is blocked it is OK to travel with and pay with unblocked Card B?

I have now just tried to register the personal account card with TfL so I can see if there are any unpaid fares on that card, and I am having problems adding it. That may be because it is in fact blocked, although Google seems to suggest that you can, and indeed should, add a blocked card to your contactless account as that's the quickest way to find out why it's been blocked and pay any outstanding charges.
 

TigerCap

Member
Joined
12 May 2026
Messages
15
Location
Bromley
What happens when you try, out of interest?
It says "Problem adding card", then underneath this message:

Sorry, your card could not be added.

Please ensure the card details you provide are correct and the address you enter is exactly as it appears on your payment card statement. If you continue to experience this message please contact your card issuer as there may be a problem with your card.

I've now logged into my online banking to see TfL payments on my personal account, and I can see two occasions in November 2025 and January 2026 where I've been charged £16.30 by TfL instead of my usual £8.00, so it looks like this may be the source of the blocking, although it doesn't look like there are any unpaid fares, just two maximum charges.

So TfL's own revenue inspection device on 30th April read the correct unblocked joint account card and all was fine, but Southeastern's revenue devices on 14th and 28th April have picked up the blocked personal account card instead, even though I wasn't using it to travel with. I was sure I had presented the correct card because I know I've got two cards on the phone and wanted to be sure I was giving the correct one, but I guess I have made an error somewhere.

Should I be flagging the above in the appeal, or are they just going to pick up on the fact that there is a blocked card on my phone and assume that I was using that one to travel with? Since there's no card number on the PFN they can't prove I was travelling on the blocked card, but I equally can't prove that I wasn't!
 

flitwickbeds

Member
Joined
19 Apr 2017
Messages
768
Is it possible that Express Transit via a mobile wallet generates a *different* virtual card number, to the virtual card number generated when adding the same card to the standard wallet?

Then if the mobile readers cannot read at all the Express Transit data, they also would fail the other cards in the wallet as they would have different virtual numbers to what has been used to tap in?
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
3,264
Location
Bath
Is it possible that Express Transit via a mobile wallet generates a *different* virtual card number, to the virtual card number generated when adding the same card to the standard wallet?

Then if the mobile readers cannot read at all the Express Transit data, they also would fail the other cards in the wallet as they would have different virtual numbers to what has been used to tap in?
No, this isn’t the case, but regardless would not make a difference as the revenue devices do not check a card is tapped in.

The OP has confirmed the thread’s suspicion that a totally different card was presented on inspection anyways.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,532
Location
Crayford
I've now logged into my online banking to see TfL payments on my personal account, and I can see two occasions in November 2025 and January 2026 where I've been charged £16.30 by TfL instead of my usual £8.00, so it looks like this may be the source of the blocking, although it doesn't look like there are any unpaid fares, just two maximum charges.
Reading this, my instinct says that you made journeys using the phone as normal and were revenue inspected on the wrong card. As that only had two revenue inspection charges and no touch ins or outs it is entirely possible that TfL blocked it. A revenue inspection on a not blocked card or device will succeed whether there is an issue or not. The imposition of the charge is made by the back office if it decides you weren't touched in at the time.
 

TigerCap

Member
Joined
12 May 2026
Messages
15
Location
Bromley
Thanks @MikeWh I think that is what's happened. I don't recall any revenue inspections when I was using the personal account to travel but I assume I have forgotten to touch out at the end of the day on two occasions (my end station doesn't have ticket barriers) and the personal account card has therefore been blocked for having two incomplete journeys. As you say, the revenue inspection took place on the wrong card.

I will submit the second round appeal explaining what has happened and hope that it's accepted, although the fact that there are no card details on the PFN does worry me as I can't prove that I was travelling on the unblocked card as opposed to the blocked one.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,532
Location
Crayford
Thanks @MikeWh I think that is what's happened. I don't recall any revenue inspections when I was using the personal account to travel but I assume I have forgotten to touch out at the end of the day on two occasions (my end station doesn't have ticket barriers) and the personal account card has therefore been blocked for having two incomplete journeys. As you say, the revenue inspection took place on the wrong card.
I think you've slightly misunderstood. Two incomplete journeys would not normally lead to a block. But two revenue inspections without any other touches would. I think you've travelled normally using the desired card but the revenue checks have gone on the other card, hence it got blocked. After that, the revenue checks said that the card was blocked, because it was, but they shouldn't have been checking the card that they were.
 

Mattplans

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2024
Messages
695
Location
London, UK
When I initiate payment on my iPhone, a primary card pops up and I often don't give this a second glance before presenting my card for payment. If OP just pushes their phone onto the oyster reader, and express travel mode is on and set to another 'secondary' card, they could be paying with that instead of their primary card. When being revenue inspected, we've already established that transit mode doesn't work so they'd need to initiate payment on their phone the regular way which could lead to them then presenting their 'primary card' (the one that isn't in use on Transit Mode) when they entered the network using their 'secondary card' (the one on transit mode).

What's strange here is that the LU inspection seems to have been successful, while the ones on Southeastern were not. I think it's highly likely this is more of a user error - and OP has presented the correct ("secondary") card on demand to LU but not to SE. * or perhaps if OP did present their primary card for inspection, this has led to it becoming blocked (as that's not the card they used to pay), hence the failed inspections that followed on Southeastern trains

Perhaps OP can double check their settings and confirm if they have a card on 'Express Travel'. - do you unlock your phone to pay for travel answers this as well

Also, do you have other cards on your phone? If this is the case, it may be worthwhile registering that card with TFL as well to see if any inspections are appearing there.
 

Benjwri

Established Member
Joined
16 Jan 2022
Messages
3,264
Location
Bath
What's strange here is that the LU inspection seems to have been successful, while the ones on Southeastern were not.
I don’t think this is strange. The LU inspections will have been the two maximum fares, and it was because of these the card was then blocked. Once it was blocked the SE inspections happened and they failed.
 

Mattplans

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2024
Messages
695
Location
London, UK
I don’t think this is strange. The LU inspections will have been the two maximum fares, and it was because of these the card was then blocked. Once it was blocked the SE inspections happened and they failed.
The LU inspection comes after the Southeastern ones.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,532
Location
Crayford
I don’t think this is strange. The LU inspections will have been the two maximum fares, and it was because of these the card was then blocked. Once it was blocked the SE inspections happened and they failed.
No. The LU inspection (singular) was more recent.

I think there is a difference in the behaviour of the RIDs used by TfL and those used by Southeastern.
 

TigerCap

Member
Joined
12 May 2026
Messages
15
Location
Bromley
No. The LU inspection (singular) was more recent.

I think there is a difference in the behaviour of the RIDs used by TfL and those used by Southeastern.
Thanks @MikeWh , this is correct. The SE inspections took place on 14 and 28 April, and both came up saying the card was blocked. The third inspection was on 30 April, on a SE train travelling between Shortlands and Victoria, and that was fine. If the devices do behave differently then the TfL one is picking up the card set to Express Travel, the card I have been using, and the SE ones are picking up the default non-travel card and assuming that is the one used to travel.

The two maximum fare charges were imposed in November 2025 and January 2026.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

When I initiate payment on my iPhone, a primary card pops up and I often don't give this a second glance before presenting my card for payment. If OP just pushes their phone onto the oyster reader, and express travel mode is on and set to another 'secondary' card, they could be paying with that instead of their primary card. When being revenue inspected, we've already established that transit mode doesn't work so they'd need to initiate payment on their phone the regular way which could lead to them then presenting their 'primary card' (the one that isn't in use on Transit Mode) when they entered the network using their 'secondary card' (the one on transit mode).

What's strange here is that the LU inspection seems to have been successful, while the ones on Southeastern were not. I think it's highly likely this is more of a user error - and OP has presented the correct ("secondary") card on demand to LU but not to SE. * or perhaps if OP did present their primary card for inspection, this has led to it becoming blocked (as that's not the card they used to pay), hence the failed inspections that followed on Southeastern trains

Perhaps OP can double check their settings and confirm if they have a card on 'Express Travel'. - do you unlock your phone to pay for travel answers this as well

Also, do you have other cards on your phone? If this is the case, it may be worthwhile registering that card with TFL as well to see if any inspections are appearing there.
Thanks for replying. I have a card on my phone set to Express Travel and have been using this to pay for the majority of my travel since October 2025 and for all of my travel since January 2026. I don't unlock the phone, just touch it to the gate reader when entering and exiting a station. I also have a second card on my phone, which was my Express Travel card until October 2025 when I switched them. It's this card which I think is blocked and causing the problem. I have tried to register it with TfL but it's not currently letting me do so.

I am pretty sure I had tried to bring up the correct card when the two SE revenue inspections happened, being aware that there are two on the phone and not wanting to present the wrong one. I'm not sure what I did differently on the TfL inspection but that was fine.
 
Last edited:

Mattplans

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2024
Messages
695
Location
London, UK
Thanks for replying. I have a card on my phone set to Express Travel and have been using this to pay for the majority of my travel since October 2025 and for all of my travel since January 2026. I don't unlock the phone, just touch it to the gate reader when entering and exiting a station. I also have a second card on my phone, which was my Express Travel card until October 2025 when I switched them. It's this card which I think is blocked and causing the problem. I have tried to register it with TfL but it's not currently letting me do so.
Just to help you register it: the verification system TfL uses means it will charge you £0.01 during the registration process. if that card is blocked to all transactions, (perhaps you've blocked it on your bank's app?) then it won't allow you to register with TfL. So you may need to undo that block to register it, and apply it back after if you so wish. Speaking from firsthand experience. :)

If those are the only two cards you have on your phone, try the above to get it unblocked, and then let us know if the failed inspections are there. If not, you may have to contact TfL to help you register it.

if you can't manage to unblock the card, the next time you travel try to pay with that card you suspect is the blocked one - if you cannot validate it on the card readers at Shortlands I think it's highly likely this is the case and it's that card that's been causing you some issues, and you erroneously presented that card to the Southeastern RPIs. (Obviously if it fails, pay with your other card or your new oyster)

Regardless, I do think that an appeal should be successful 3rd round due to the fact your other registered card clearly shows you made the journeys in question and paid for it.

I'm thinking - although some other members may be better placed to comment on this - that your appeal shouldn't try to explain that you had a blocked card, and all the digressions on Express Travel etc etc, just explain that the penalty was issued incorrectly because you did pay for your journey, and that you can prove it. The general consensus here is that the individuals that review these appeals have difficulty following a long sequence of events, and it's better to serve it to them straight and leave no room for misinterpretation.

Upload your original appeal as well and we can make some recommendations on how to improve that for your 2nd round.
 

Adam Williams

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2018
Messages
3,498
Location
Warks
Just to help you register it: the verification system TfL uses means it will charge you £0.01 during the registration process. if that card is blocked to all transactions, (perhaps you've blocked it on your bank's app?) then it won't allow you to register with TfL. So you may need to undo that block to register it, and apply it back after if you so wish. Speaking from firsthand experience
The error message TfL provide is characteristically useless and does not really communicate what is going on properly at all, but reading between the lines it looks like they may also be wanting a positive AVS response - so probably worth double-checking the billing address provided (and on-file with the card issuer) as well.
 

furlong

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2013
Messages
5,300
Location
Reading
Which bank/card scheme is this? I had problems previously with a particular card not being recognised by all their systems, which TfL customer support acknowledged was a problem at their end and a few months later they got back to me to say they'd managed to fix it.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,532
Location
Crayford
The third inspection was on 30 April, on a SE train travelling between Shortlands and Victoria, and that was fine.
This changes things. That was almost certainly a Southeastern check. They may therefore have resolved the issue with their RIDs.

Have you got any further with adding the blocked card to your account? If you are still struggling and can't get the helpdesk to sort it out, please reach out to me via private chat and I'll see if I can get help from a different angle within TfL.
 

TigerCap

Member
Joined
12 May 2026
Messages
15
Location
Bromley
Just to help you register it: the verification system TfL uses means it will charge you £0.01 during the registration process. if that card is blocked to all transactions, (perhaps you've blocked it on your bank's app?) then it won't allow you to register with TfL. So you may need to undo that block to register it, and apply it back after if you so wish. Speaking from firsthand experience. :)

If those are the only two cards you have on your phone, try the above to get it unblocked, and then let us know if the failed inspections are there. If not, you may have to contact TfL to help you register it.

if you can't manage to unblock the card, the next time you travel try to pay with that card you suspect is the blocked one - if you cannot validate it on the card readers at Shortlands I think it's highly likely this is the case and it's that card that's been causing you some issues, and you erroneously presented that card to the Southeastern RPIs. (Obviously if it fails, pay with your other card or your new oyster)

Regardless, I do think that an appeal should be successful 3rd round due to the fact your other registered card clearly shows you made the journeys in question and paid for it.

I'm thinking - although some other members may be better placed to comment on this - that your appeal shouldn't try to explain that you had a blocked card, and all the digressions on Express Travel etc etc, just explain that the penalty was issued incorrectly because you did pay for your journey, and that you can prove it. The general consensus here is that the individuals that review these appeals have difficulty following a long sequence of events, and it's better to serve it to them straight and leave no room for misinterpretation.

Upload your original appeal as well and we can make some recommendations on how to improve that for your 2nd round.
Thanks @Mattplans , I've now registered the blocked card and the two failed revenue inspections from November 25 and January 26 are on there (actually when I cross-checked them with the unblocked card, the same thing had happened - travelling with the Express Travel-enabled card, but revenue checked on the other default payment card, which meant no record of a journey hence the maximum charge). I've taken a screenshot from my TfL account showing no journey history on that card for April 2026 which will hopefully assist in the 2nd round appeal

Point taken about the appeal. I probably did waffle on too much but I just couldn't understand what had happened when I knew I had definitely tapped in at Victoria. I have already provided them with the journey history for that day showing the fares being deducted.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

This changes things. That was almost certainly a Southeastern check. They may therefore have resolved the issue with their RIDs.

Have you got any further with adding the blocked card to your account? If you are still struggling and can't get the helpdesk to sort it out, please reach out to me via private chat and I'll see if I can get help from a different angle within TfL.
Thanks @MikeWh , it was my error as my laptop was auto-filling an incorrect expiry date for the card which I hadn't spotted. Once I cleared it and inputted the numbers manually it worked fine.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,532
Location
Crayford
I've now registered the blocked card and the two failed revenue inspections from November 25 and January 26 are on there (actually when I cross-checked them with the unblocked card, the same thing had happened - travelling with the Express Travel-enabled card, but revenue checked on the other default payment card, which meant no record of a journey hence the maximum charge). I've taken a screenshot from my TfL account showing no journey history on that card for April 2026 which will hopefully assist in the 2nd round appeal
Good news. That's exactly what I thought had happened. Can you contact the helpdesk again with evidence of both cards and ask if they'll (a) refund the two erroneous charges, and (b) unblock the card so you can use it again if you so decide. Please let us know how you get on.
 

CheapAndNerdy

Member
Joined
17 Jan 2010
Messages
357
@MikeWh, perhaps you might know this; if the phone happens to be unlocked at the point of an RPI check, would the wrong card be scanned?
 

Top