birchesgreen
Established Member
Well to be honest the rather striking livery is only now disappearing, years after the name on the side changed.SWT was a very strong brand and will take time to die out. Similarly with Virgin Trains.
Well to be honest the rather striking livery is only now disappearing, years after the name on the side changed.SWT was a very strong brand and will take time to die out. Similarly with Virgin Trains.
To split hairs, this is accepted usage if referring to the route itself, or the trains (similar to how you might refer to an HS1 service or an HS1 train, but you wouldn't say they were operated by HS1) as Crossrail refers to the engineering project to build the core. That being said, in contrast to the prescriptivism on this thread I support your right to the use of a non-standard term, even if I disagree with you!This one is debatable admittedlly as it has never publicly operated under this name. But I absolutely insist on referring to the TOC that runs purple trains between Reading/Heathrow and Shenfield/Abbey Wood as CrossRail.
My grandmother always calls it "the Thames Link", very clearly as two words.A tad offtopic, but most people I know call it "the Thameslink", seemingly as a named train instead of a company. I have also heard people say "the c2c".
My grandmother always calls it "the Thames Link", very clearly as two words.
Stagecoach - crap at running trains, brilliant at brandingSWT was a very strong brand and will take time to die out. Similarly with Virgin Trains.
Disagree fundamentally with that. Stagecoach were good at running trains - you only have to look at their successors (SWR, EMR, Avanti) to realise it.Stagecoach - crap at running trains, brilliant at branding
Disagree fundamentally with that. Stagecoach were good at running trains - you only have to look at their successors (SWR, EMR, Avanti) to realise it.
Am I the only one who has always called Stagecoach something similar but a lot ruder?Disagree fundamentally with that. Stagecoach were good at running trains - you only have to look at their successors (SWR, EMR, Avanti) to realise it.
Not too surprising perhaps, seeing their Double Arrow is still doing its stuff for GBR. Is it perhaps rather too soon to know if GBR will live up to its promised "Great"ness?I still hear British Rail!
Indeed - as an occasional performer of the Mikado’s song about the punishment fitting the crime, I greatly regret the loss of “First” from the tote. To a West Country audience the substitution of “First Great Western Trains” for the original “parliamentary trains” always went down well. It’s still doable (until later this year) with the addition of an “‘s”….Plenty of my friends from back home in the west country still refer to GWR as First Great Western. Sometimes Great Western Trains, but that's a misnomer rather than referring to the 1997-1999 operator.
Several Southern drivers have announced that we're delayed due to 'South West Trains' on my commute this year alone!
Looking ahead, may I suggest that "Great British Railway" might substitute quite nicely for "parliamentary". A "source of innocent merriment" anyway!Indeed - as an occasional performer of the Mikado’s song about the punishment fitting the crime, I greatly regret the loss of “First” from the tote. To a West Country audience the substitution of “First Great Western Trains” for the original “parliamentary trains” always went down well. It’s still doable (until later this year) with the addition of an “‘s”….
You’re right. Sigh of relief….Looking ahead, may I suggest that "Great British Railway" might substitute quite nicely for "parliamentary". A "source of innocent merriment" anyway!
Excellent! Reminds me of the ENO version with 'Transport for London Trains'.Indeed - as an occasional performer of the Mikado’s song about the punishment fitting the crime, I greatly regret the loss of “First” from the tote. To a West Country audience the substitution of “First Great Western Trains” for the original “parliamentary trains” always went down well. It’s still doable (until later this year) with the addition of an “‘s”….
True - they did ok after a very iffy start
(Their trains were far better looked after than Connex).
One thing that may influence things is that SWT will perhaps always be associated with the "good old" pre-Covid days, while SWR have, to date, mostly been associated with the post-Covid hard times (after a brief promising start in the form of the 2019 timetable featuring additional peak and shoulder-peak services, and the attempted re-introduction of the 442s).
I have to admit I did like the SWT branding, and the different colour schemes for different units.
I have to say, I've only really had good experiences with SWR - I've done a fair bit of longish distance travel with them over the years.
I think the failure to reintroduce services, coupled with endemic skip-stopping and inability to recover from disruption have really smeared them in the minds of commuters. Plus the whole Arterio introduction fiasco can't have helped, although now they're in that's a big win. Much will be fault of DfT but the SWR brand is still the face of it.I have to say, I've only really had good experiences with SWR - I've done a fair bit of longish distance travel with them over the years.
FCC had an all electric fleet (except for an 03 shunter)Didn't realise Class 150207 once used to be part of First Capital Connect:
(Attached image of interior carriage sign showing "First Capital Connect" on it)
Operations are now run by a new public sector operator – Thameslink Southern Great Northern Limited (TSGNL) – a subsidiary of public corporation DfT Operator Limited (DFTO).
GTR is still the trading name.GTR, still being used by some members of this forum, now TSGNL
![]()
Transfer of Govia Thameslink Railway’s services into public ownership
Confirming the transfer of Govia Thameslink Railway's services into public ownership.www.gov.uk
GTR includes Southern, Thameslink, Great Northern and Gatwick Express. GTR is a trading name of Thameslink Southern Great Northern Limited (TSGNL).
Or an old message programmed into the PIS system from the days GWR ran to Brighton?FCC had an all electric fleet (except for an 03 shunter)
Could this be a result of a ‘box swap’ relating to the PIS from one of FCCs old units?