I just wish Heworth had a bus service that ran later than ~6pmB9TL 37295 has been repainted to Ultraviolet.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
As part of service changes in York from 31st May, timetables have come online on Bustimes. Most interestingly, is the change to the 11.
The 11 will be changed to operate 1bph during the day between Heworth, York and Bishopthorpe skipping the South Bank loop to provide a more direct service between Bishopthorpe and York along Bishopthorpe Road. A new 11A will operate 1bph between Heworth, York and Bishopthorpe and will serve the South Bank loop. Together, there will be 2bph daytimes between Heworth, York and Bishopthorpe, with 1bph serving the South Bank loop.
Noting the timetables, unfortunately it doesn't seem to be a clockface half-hourly service but rather AI reminiscent with unexpected headways.
I wonder if this is in response to East Yorkshire launching an hourly service Monday-Saturday between York & Bishopthorpe direct along Bishopthorpe Road at the end of March. Either way, as this is my local bus route, I'm happy to see the increase in service.
Timetable: https://bustimes.org/services/11a-ashley-park-bridge-acaster-lane
Coastliner 843 buses leave Stonebow at 1822, 1855, 1925, 1955, 2055, 2155 and 2330 on weekdays / 1855, 1955, 2055, 2155 and 2330 on Saturday / 1855, 1955, 2155 and 2330 on Sunday. Evening services into York run at a similar frequency with the last bus at about 2300.I just wish Heworth had a bus service that ran later than ~6pm![]()
From 31 May, we’re improving the frequency of Service 10 and 11, with buses in and out of York City Centre running approximately every 30 minutes.
With direct, comfortable rides on our electric buses, this is the easy choice for travelling around York, whether you’re commuting to work, catching up with friends or visiting family.
Timetables from 31st May
View service 10 timetables here
View service 11/11A timetables here
Not exactly a clock-face timetable. The usual First unmemorable mess of different times for different hours. And why is the Monday timetable different to Tuesday to Friday? Do First actually want people to use their buses?Changes in York from 31st May, including the aforementioned increase to the 11:
More buses - Service 10 & 11
We're making it easier to get around York from 31st May 2026. We're making it easier to get around York by increasing the frequency of our services on 10 & 11/11A services.www.firstbus.co.uk
Some really positive changes, the 10 is going to a half-hourly clockface timetable Monday-Saturday, although unfortunately the hourly Sunday service isn't clockface. The 11/11A also aren't clockface half-hourly which is disappointing, but the increases in frequency are great to see.
I don't see any separate timetable for Monday than Tuesday to Friday. Only a Monday-Friday timetable. It is clockface throughout the day with the odd change by 1-2 minutes.Not exactly a clock-face timetable. The usual First unmemorable mess of different times for different hours. And why is the Monday timetable different to Tuesday to Friday? Do First actually want people to use their buses?
Bit weird that. I definitely saw separate timetables for Monday & Tuesday to Friday but can't find them any more.I don't see any separate timetable for Monday than Tuesday to Friday. Only a Monday-Friday timetable. It is clockface throughout the day with the odd change by 1-2 minutes.
Timetables
www.firstbus.co.uk
Further update. There are a lot of Monday & Tuesday to Friday timetables on this page: https://www.firstbus.co.uk/york/plan-journey/timetables?page=2 I think it might be to do with the May Day Bank Holiday.Bit weird that. I definitely saw separate timetables for Monday & Tuesday to Friday but can't find them any more.
Yes, if you look some of the Monday only timetables, you'll see that Bank Holiday is listed under the notes section under the service number. It also says under those timetables "Valid on 4/05/2026" which was May Day Bank Holiday.I think it might be to do with the May Day Bank Holiday.
22 Leeds • Headingley • Headingley Campus Sun 17 May 2026 Operated by First This service will operate from September to May only. 25 Leeds • Headingley • Lawnswood Sun 17 May 2026 Operated by First This service will operate from September to July only.
...
74 75 Leeds • Middleton Circular Sun 10 May 2026 Operated by First A revised route will be introduced due to the closure of Pepper Road. There is also revised routing due to extended closure of Kirkgate in Leeds City Centre. 86 Rodley • Bramley • Armley • Holbeck • Middleton Sun 10 May 2026 Operated by First A revised route will be introduced due to the closure of Pepper Road
...
363 X63 Huddersfield • Brighouse • Bradford Sun 17 May 2026 Operated by First A revised timetable will be introduced to improve punctuality and reliability.
508 Halifax • Shelf • Odsal • Thornbury • Leeds Sun 17 May 2026 Operated by First A revised timetable will be introduced to improve punctuality and reliability.
548 549 Halifax • Hipperholme • Brighouse • Rastrick • Cowcliffe • Huddersfield Sun 17 May 2026 Operated by First A revised route will be introduced through Huddersfield town centre via Market St, Railway Street, Northumberland Street, Southgate Castlegate to St John’s Road.
579 Halifax • Sowerby Bridge • Sowerby Sun 17 May 2026 Operated by First A revised timetable will be introduced to improve punctuality and reliability.
615 Bradford • Four Lane Ends • Cottingley • Bingley • Eldwick Sun 17 May 2026 Operated by First / Go Ahead West Yorkshire This service will be operated by Go Ahead West Yorkshire.
616 619 Bradford • Allerton • Wilsden • Harden • Bingley • Eldwick Sun 17 May 2026 Operated by First / Go Ahead West Yorkshire This service will be operated by Go Ahead West Yorkshire. 633 Shipley • Wrose • Bradford • Tyersal Sun 17 May 2026 Operated by First / TLC / Go Ahead West Yorkshire This service operated by First will be operated by Go Ahead West Yorkshire.
636 637 Bradford • Clayton Sun 17 May 2026 Operated by First A revised timetable will be introduced to improve punctuality and reliability
I don't think people are bothered about pretty timetables but about times being easy to remember. I know when my 3 bus routes from town are between 0845 and 1505 and between 1900 and 2300 as they're the same times past each hour. Between those times I might need to look them up, but not for every bus in going to catch.Why are people so bothered about pretty timetables? And varying times in the day is obviously going to happen, as with driving anywhere it just takes longer at certain times of the day…
I think we all acknowledge that times will change at certain times of the day to reflect traffic levels. However, First's AI garbage is just that and it ends up with a) difficult to remember timetables and b) random waiting at stops to meet timetables.I don't think people are bothered about pretty timetables but about times being easy to remember. I know when my 3 buses from town are between 0845 and 1505 and between 1900 and 2300 as they're the same times past each hour. Between those times I might need to look them up, but not for every bus in going to catch.
What I don't understand is why First thinks their variable timetables are more robust. Do the same traffic delays occur at the same times every day? If they have managed to predict that so accurately let's put them in charge of the Department of Transport. Or the Economy!I think we all acknowledge that times will change at certain times of the day to reflect traffic levels. However, First's AI garbage is just that and it ends up with a) difficult to remember timetables and b) random waiting at stops to meet timetables.
There is a First route near me which has a consistent journey time for the daytime routes and clockface departures except one at lunchtime still leaves with the clockface but then runs two mins earlier throughout! Even more bizarrely, the route takes longer in the evening/night than daytime!
The thing is that most traffic is fairly predictable - heavy in the peaks, perhaps a bit lighter on a Friday and of course, when the schools are off. So operators have always amended times to reflect that. What the First times have is unregulated AI and trying to make it into a precise science; that and using it as a means of disguising PVR reductions by fixing the level of resource and then letting it loose.What I don't understand is why First thinks their variable timetables are more robust. Do the same traffic delays occur at the same times every day? If they have managed to predict that so accurately let's put them in charge of the Department of Transport. Or the Economy!
Interestingly Yutong E10 68809 is tracking on the 876 today. First has used a Yutong on the 74 to Grassington via Bolton Abbey in previous years but the 876 is certainly a more challenging route with the ascend over Kidstones.
Ah shame, although the capacity of a decker is certainly needed on the 876!A photo confirmed this to be 37803 tracking erroneously.
When First Leeds ran the 74, they had to go the long way round via Embsay and Eastby between Bolton Bridge and Barden Tower, because the high-roofed E10s were too tall for the Bolton Abbey arch, so didn't actually serve Bolton Abbey – not ideal to miss out one of the key attractions on the route and add a completely unnecessary 20 minute diversion to the route. With First Leeds having plenty of regular diesel single-deckers that they could have used, I never understood the logic behind running E10s on it.Interestingly Yutong E10 68809 is tracking on the 876 today. First has used a Yutong on the 74 to Grassington via Bolton Abbey in previous years but the 876 is certainly a more challenging route with the ascend over Kidstones.
When First Leeds ran the 74, they had to go the long way round via Embsay and Eastby between Bolton Bridge and Barden Tower, because the high-roofed E10s were too tall for the Bolton Abbey arch, so didn't actually serve Bolton Abbey – not ideal to miss out one of the key attractions on the route and add a completely unnecessary 20 minute diversion to the route. With First Leeds having plenty of regular diesel single-deckers that they could have used, I never understood the logic behind running E10s on it.
The 876 is about 75 miles each way, so 150 miles on the daily diagram plus dead mileage to/from the depot. I don't know what kind of mileage the E10s usually cover, and obviously the faster running would be more of a challenge then they normally see pottering around Halton – but presumably they would get some regen benefit on the downhills? But as you say, the bigger problem would be that you would need two of them to accommodate the number of passengers travelling!
I'm surprised First never ran the E10 to Bolton Abbey and then turned around to go to Grassington via Cracoe. Transdev & York Pullman did that when the road was closed through Burnsall last February.When First Leeds ran the 74, they had to go the long way round via Embsay and Eastby between Bolton Bridge and Barden Tower, because the high-roofed E10s were too tall for the Bolton Abbey arch, so didn't actually serve Bolton Abbey – not ideal to miss out one of the key attractions on the route and add a completely unnecessary 20 minute diversion to the route. With First Leeds having plenty of regular diesel single-deckers that they could have used, I never understood the logic behind running E10s on it.
The 876 is about 75 miles each way, so 150 miles on the daily diagram plus dead mileage to/from the depot. I don't know what kind of mileage the E10s usually cover, and obviously the faster running would be more of a challenge then they normally see pottering around Halton – but presumably they would get some regen benefit on the downhills? But as you say, the bigger problem would be that you would need two of them to accommodate the number of passengers travelling!
The route was already 20 minutes slower from turning round at Bolton Bridge than if they had followed the usual route, going up to Bolton Abbey itself and either turning in the car park or doing a 3-point turn in a T-junction would have added another 5 minutes to that, making it even less attractive. The whole idea was ridiculous and should never have been tried, no implementation of it was going to work well, wherever they turned the bus round.I'm surprised First never ran the E10 to Bolton Abbey and then turned around to go to Grassington via Cracoe. Transdev & York Pullman did that when the road was closed through Burnsall last February.
I can understand doing it once for a bit of promotion for the route and as an experiment. Doing it repeatedly is just inconvenient for passengers though.The route was already 20 minutes slower from turning round at Bolton Bridge than if they had followed the usual route, going up to Bolton Abbey itself and either turning in the car park or doing a 3-point turn in a T-junction would have added another 5 minutes to that, making it even less attractive. The whole idea was ridiculous and should never have been tried, no implementation of it was going to work well, wherever they turned the bus round.
That's definitely the main reason why First have these timetables.What the First times have is unregulated AI and trying to make it into a precise science; that and using it as a means of disguising PVR reductions
The problem with doing it for one day is that you then have to explain why buses are going to be running very late at certain points in the day, which is hardly going to endear you to passengers! Once you've established that the bus can't fit through Bolton Abbey arch, it's a non-starter unless there's going to be a day when that bit of road is closed anyway and so you have to divert around the arch regardless, and then you can give Old Sparky a try.I can understand doing it once for a bit of promotion for the route and as an experiment. Doing it repeatedly is just inconvenient for passengers though.
I think increasing journey times by over 20 minutes multiple times for no apparent reason is also going to make you unpopular with passengers! Possibly more than if it were a one off, and would cause less disruption in the long term. As you say though, an opportunity like the road closures in Burnsall last February would've been perfect for First to give an E10 a go on the route!The problem with doing it for one day is that you then have to explain why buses are going to be running very late at certain points in the day, which is hardly going to endear you to passengers! Once you've established that the bus can't fit through Bolton Abbey arch, it's a non-starter unless there's going to be a day when that bit of road is closed anyway and so you have to divert around the arch regardless, and then you can give Old Sparky a try.
Reducing the frequency from 30 to 40 minutes at peak times is often a reflection of increasing congestion meaning the buses need more time to complete their round trip reliably, so no actual PVR reduction, they just need longer to do the same job.That's definitely the main reason why First have these timetables.
We've seen that in and around Bradford on quite a lot of routes. The AI timetables have been used as a way of extending 2bph out to 3bp2h without First having to openly admit that's exactly what they're doing.
Changing times in the peak makes sense to ensure a more robust timetable. I don't think the same principle applies during the day.Reducing the frequency from 30 to 40 minutes at peak times is often a reflection of increasing congestion meaning the buses need more time to complete their round trip reliably, so no actual PVR reduction, they just need longer to do the same job.
One example from my area.
PM peak departures previously every 30 mins from 1510 to 1810, but poor punctuality.
Now departures at 1510, 1545, 1620, 1655, 1727, 1800, 1835, but with much improved punctuality.
That would probably fit your 2bph to 3bp2h description, however the PVR is the same, and as most of the buses now finish at the depot later than they did previously the operating costs have actually increased.
Whilst I appreciate where @Stan Drews is coming from, and we all understand the need to amend timings during peak, this is definitely the case.Changing times in the peak makes sense to ensure a more robust timetable. I don't think the same principle applies during the day.
Quite - one of my local buses drops from being every 30 minutes to being every 35 or 40 during the peak (used to be every 25 when they added an extra bus during peak times) but more than 50% of departures all day are at the same times past the hour - and all buses leave the first stop at a time ending in 0 or 5, not a completely random, and harder to remember time.Changing times in the peak makes sense to ensure a more robust timetable. I don't think the same principle applies during the day.