Or the signaller has forgotten to interpose the description, where done manually.And then **** usually denotes either a signal failure or an unidentified train/item on the tracks doesnt it?
Signaller a fan of Hot Fuzz? "Narp" is a line in that meaning "no" (which we've also seen before on berths)Does anyone know the meaning of 'NARP' below 1V48? For context, the service was delayed and eventually terminated at Exeter St Davids due to disorder (according to Realtime Trains).
That makes sense, I also saw 'FUZZY' earlier on the same berthSignaller a fan of Hot Fuzz? "Narp" is a line in that meaning "no" (which we've also seen before on berths)
Are you sure? FUZZY is 5 characters.I also saw 'FUZZY' earlier on the same berth
FUZY maybe?Are you sure? FUZZY is 5 characters.
I think you might be right, my apologies.FUZY maybe?
Person In Charge Of. There are various PICO'x' roles. PICOY PICOY etcDoes anyone have any ideas about a meaning of the PICO code in Beeston Run Around at the moment, could be nothing but I’m intrigued.
Person In Charge Of (…Sidings)Does anyone have any ideas about a meaning of the PICO code in Beeston Run Around at the moment, could be nothing but I’m intrigued.
Person In Charge Of (…Sidings)
As in, someone has taken it under possession for engineering/maintenance.
Yeah fair point - You don’t need to tell me what signallers might do, I am one lol, but yard PICs completely slipped my mind thanks.Could be but PIC is most likely a reminder that a shunter/groundstaff is on site and in charge of the sidings for any train movements taking place. Most private yards will have an agreement in place with the signaller that no train movements ie arr & dep cannot take place without a PIC on site.
Sometimes the signaller will mark the signal berth with the name of the PIC and will most likely have a form filled in showing name, tel no, company and book on/off times.
Railcam, it’s also been changed now to 0M48. Must’ve just been a Railcam-side thing, not across all diagrams.What system is that screenshot from please? The TD berth in siding 2 (nearest to platform 11) currently contains the description “LOCO”. Maybe something else has tied it to the TOPS number.

Because the signaller interposed the same description twice? Probably because plans changed, and they either haven't noticed the first instance, or haven't got around to removing it.How do we end up with two 5W51s at Euston at the same time...? Screenshot below...
Thank you; what really puzzled me was that the upper 5W51 was on schedule ( close enough... 5 late off Camden ) but the lower 5W51 had been showing for some time before that - when that code shouldn't have been anywhere near Euston.Because the signaller interposed the same description twice? Probably because plans changed, and they either haven't noticed the first instance, or haven't got around to removing it.
Remember that this isn't what the signaller sees. The signalling indication panel or screen shows the state of all the track circuits and axle counters - these are the signallers primary source of information about where trains are. The train descriptions are very much a secondary source, to help the signaller identify what train that line of red lights is. Added to which, the train description is often not where the train is. A busy signaller may not bother with discrepancies such as that you mention - he knows where the train is, and he can sort the TD out later (or it will automatically sort itself out when the next train comes along).
At terminii, the TD can be configured in interesting ways to try and help the signallers. I have seen places where the incoming description automatically generates the outgoing description. And other places where the signaller can interpose the description before the train arrives, so that the train automatically picks up the new description when it arrives. This saves the signaller from having to wait until the train has actually arrived to interpose the description, meaning that he has one less thing on his mind to do.Thank you; what really puzzled me was that the upper 5W51 was on schedule ( close enough... 5 late off Camden ) but the lower 5W51 had been showing for some time before that - when that code shouldn't have been anywhere near Euston.
My guess would be a 60 mph TRS.Local to where I live I see *60*, I guess that is some type of block? It just that it is only some lines and 4533 seems passable.
View attachment 202481
As far as I am aware, this is known as Automatic Code Insertion and is a part of Automatic Route Setting. The old headcode goes in the rear, whereas the new headcode goes in front, when there are multiple berths. If I understand it correctly though ARS must be fitted for ACI to exist, so it likely doesn't exist at many termini at all.At terminii, the TD can be configured in interesting ways to try and help the signallers. I have seen places where the incoming description automatically generates the outgoing description.
Could also be Item 60 in the WON!My guess would be a 60 mph TRS.
There might have been a *60* in the berth for 4533, but it has been overwritten by the description of a train passing through, and the signaller hasn't gotten around to interposing it back in.
With a traditional panel, you could put reminders on the panel of such things, but this is not possible with vdu screens.
It's unlikely to be a 60mph TSR when the High Level Goods lines have a PSR of 40/45mph, and the curve between Meadow Lane Jn and Attenborough Jn a PSR of 20mph.My guess would be a 60 mph TRS.
There might have been a *60* in the berth for 4533, but it has been overwritten by the description of a train passing through, and the signaller hasn't gotten around to interposing it back in.
With a traditional panel, you could put reminders on the panel of such things, but this is not possible with vdu screens.
I am fairly certain that I saw it on one of the Southern panels, either London Bridge or Victoria. Wherever it was, it was certainly on a panel, so no ARS.As far as I am aware, this is known as Automatic Code Insertion and is a part of Automatic Route Setting. The old headcode goes in the rear, whereas the new headcode goes in front, when there are multiple berths. If I understand it correctly though ARS must be fitted for ACI to exist, so it likely doesn't exist at many termini at all.