BRX
Established Member
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 4,477
The cost of sorting out alternative transport for day seat passengers when the sleeper is disrupted or cancelled may also play a part.
At last count I believe it was subsidised by £1 for every £1 of revenue.I'm fairly certain the Sleeper as a whole loses money anyway!
I doubt it would an any significant cost as if it is a late notice cancellation then alternative transport would likely run anyway for all other passengers (including those in seats to south of Edinburgh) so they could just alight from the alternative transport which would run anyway.The cost of sorting out alternative transport for day seat passengers when the sleeper is disrupted or cancelled may also play a part.
I'm thinking of the stops along the West Highland Line that aren't served by the road route from Fort William to Glasgow, so have to be sorted out separately from whatever is provided for the main bulk of passengers. They are some of the ones most popular with hillwalkers, for whom the earliest & latest services of the day can be useful/attractive.I doubt it would an any significant cost as if it is a late notice cancellation then alternative transport would likely run anyway for all other passengers (including those in seats to south of Edinburgh) so they could just alight from the alternative transport which would run anyway.
That might depend where they were going, to give an extreme example a seat booked Fort William to Rannoch would, if nobody was booked to join at Rannoch presumably require a Taxi. Fort William to Rannoch is 93 miles by road, even the nearest non West Highland stations are Blair Atholl 34 miles or Pitlochry is 41 miles And for anyone following the railway map the next station down the line at Bridge of Orchy (which replacement transport might serve) is a 73 mile road journey.I doubt it would an any significant cost as if it is a late notice cancellation then alternative transport would likely run anyway for all other passengers (including those in seats to south of Edinburgh) so they could just alight from the alternative transport which would run anyway.
I had forgotten the roads between the West Highland line stations were very indirect compared to the railway route, so can see how the cost could add up providing lots of local journeys as would likely be the case during the summer months.That might depend where they were going, to give an extreme example a seat booked Fort William to Rannoch would, if nobody was booked to join at Rannoch presumably require a Taxi. Fort William to Rannoch is 93 miles by road, even the nearest non West Highland stations are Blair Atholl 34 miles or Pitlochry is 41 miles And for anyone following the railway map the next station down the line at Bridge of Orchy (which replacement transport might serve) is a 73 mile road journey.
I’m sure I’ve read elsewhere that they only release the seats for domestic Scottish journeys 7 days before the train runs - which, although a bit of a nuisance, is understandable as long distance passengers should have priority.They perhaps really, really don't want people to book short distances in case they have long distance customers wanting the seat?
Weird and frustrating, though
Its a bit different when its a bus replacement to Kingussie as this is usually when it is planned disruption so you would (should) not be able to book the sleeper from certain intermediate stations that are planned not to be served on those days.So it's certainly not a given that rail replacement would be going to intermediates anyway. Indeed, don't they normally when it's planned bus people to Kingussie?
I’m curious as to why engineering works at Euston and starting at KX means the CS has to use ECML and wipe out the newly introduced Birmingham stop? I’ll admit my ignorance on if and how the ECML and WCML link to each other but surely there’s some form of connecting line it can take to transfer onto the WCML before Birmingham?!
I’m curious as to why engineering works at Euston and starting at KX means the CS has to use ECML and wipe out the newly introduced Birmingham stop? I’ll admit my ignorance on if and how the ECML and WCML link to each other but surely there’s some form of connecting line it can take to transfer onto the WCML before Birmingham?!
Theres not an electrified route
Anything is possible but operationally very difficult. The only way I can think of that would make Birmingham International involves a reverse: retracing the route the ECS takes between Wembley and Kings Cross.I’m curious as to why engineering works at Euston and starting at KX means the CS has to use ECML and wipe out the newly introduced Birmingham stop? I’ll admit my ignorance on if and how the ECML and WCML link to each other but surely there’s some form of connecting line it can take to transfer onto the WCML before Birmingham?!
Is there any route? I don't think there's a way of the CS getting from Kings Cross to Birmingham International without reversing either before or at BHI.
OK thanks that makes sense.Theres not an electrified route
Best thing is to look at https://www.openrailwaymap.org/ and trace the lines out of Kings Cross. You'll quickly see how limited the options are, and that's before considering any operational limits like needing electrification.OK that makes sense? They managed to run GWR trains into Euston when there were engineering works at Paddington, could they not do the reverse? Or would that involve reversing as well!
OK thanks that makes sense.
Tounge in cheek I recognise, but St Pancras International platforms don't give signalled access to both routes.I suggest using St. Pancras International as the backup London terminus. The international platforms are long enough and give electrified access to both the WCML and ECML. I foresee no problems with this plan.
Problem 1 of about 7000 I think!They dont give signalled access though.
You still need a platform that can take two engines and a 16 coach train, of which there aren't very many.I’m sure I’ve seen somewhere a discussion about using class 99s for CS services. This would give more flexibility in and out of London terminals?