40kWh battery is why. 100-150 miles range is of little use to a typical user.
As someone who has a car with this range and regularly (about once a month) do a trip of over 200 miles, it's not the problem many think it is.
Also, I would say that range is achievable when the family and there luggage is loaded.
Day to day the car gets charged about 3 or 4 times a week. Whilst this is more than the one a week once every 10 days we used to fill up with fuel it's less of an impact (the car is always ready to do 80+ miles in the morning and often 100+ miles, whilst with fuel it could be ready to do 300+ miles but it could also need to be filled up before going anywhere else).
Doing a long trip to see family, we have to stop, but given the journey (depending on family being visited) is between 3 and 4 hours a forced stop isn't that much of an issue - especially given my fairly recent change in health which means I often need to do something which requires a stop for a few minutes within that timeframe anyway.
However, even without that it's no big deal, as for most people they should need a loo break during that time anyway.
An extra but if range (say 150 to 200 miles) would hardly impact us. A few less charges a month and a bit more flexibility on our stop location to charge (however there's already several options for charging locations with more due soon) and maybe remove the need for a second 8-13 minute charge in the winter in cold/bad weather (however I suspect even those may not be that common).
Would it be nice to have a range of 250-300 miles so we didn't have to stop unless we chose to? Probably, however in the scheme of things very much a nice to have and we probably wouldn't be able to justify the extra cost for such a small impact on our driving, and that's from someone who would benefit from it at least monthly.
Even pre EV, when we went from SE England to the Lakes we did a day stop in the Midlands (Black Country Living museum, as an aside it's with visiting, even though it didn't have any trains!) with an overnight stay near Manchester. In doing so it meant we did a few hours of driving at a time, let the kids let off steam between sitting in the car and actually made it part of our memories rather than just a slog of drive.
With the EV we'd do something similar. Maybe something like:
Trip up:
Leave work Friday evening drive for an hour or so
Have an evening meal and charge
Drive for another hour or so
Check into overnight accommodation around 10pm (charge)
Get up and get on the road early
Pause an hour in for breakfast and a charge
Drive another hour or so have a day out.
Leave around 4 and arrive in the Lakes around 6pm Saturday
In the way back, leave mid morning Saturday
Explore the area on the way out of the Lakes
Have lunch somewhere in the edge of the Lake District and charge
Go to somewhere like Chester for an overnight stay (explore in the evening)
Get up and drive, pause for breakfast and a charge
Go to a day out location (arriving around 10:30) charge whilst there
Leave around 4:30
Stop for dinner and a charge around 6pm
Drive to a wee/coffee break and charge
Arrive home around 10pm
By doing that, rather than slogging through 5 hours of driving the travel there is as much of the holiday as being in the Lakes.
Going to Scotland would probably require shorter day visits and/or more refreshment breaks and/or earlier starts and/or later arrival times. However, would still be more of the experience rather than just a day of "are we nearly there yet?".
Yes it's different way of doing things, but for something which most people wouldn't do more than once a year, it's not much of an issue.
OK, it would have that we couldn't just blast through Friday night, spend a weekend there and blast back Sunday night, however I would suggest those sorts of distances for a weekend aren't really suitable.