Resuwen
Member
Expecting an announcement at lunchtime on the future of ADL’s Scottish operations
Please will you share a link to this announcement, once it's in the public domainExpecting an announcement at lunchtime on the future of ADL’s Scottish operations
Expecting an announcement at lunchtime on the future of ADL’s Scottish operations
Britain's biggest bus and coach manufacturer which has been propped up by tens of millions in public money in Scotland has decided to lay off more than a quarter of their staff despite a government-rescue bid sparked by its threat to move to England.
Britain's biggest coach builder Alexander Dennis (ADL) has said that up to 115 roles would be placed at risk of potential redundancy as it consulted on a new approach aimed at securing Scottish manufacturing operations and safeguarding jobs.
The company previously proposed closing said it would keep its Scottish sites open after the Scottish government pledged money towards a furlough scheme.
The company had previously set out plans to close its facilities in Falkirk and Larbert, with the loss of 400 jobs, and move production to Yorkshire.
Under the consultation, ADL would convert its Larbert manufacturing facility to a chassis manufacturing site, supporting all of its low-emission and zero-emission bus products.
Bus manufacturer Alexander Dennis is to shut its base in Falkirk with 115 jobs at risk.
The company also announced it will turn its Larbert facility into a chassis manufacturing site...
And above is STV News’ coverage of the closure. No massive surprise - expect some mud slinging with the electric funding announced only last week.Paul Davies, Alexander Dennis president and managing director, said: “We are proposing to retain jobs and restart manufacturing at Larbert with a focus on chassis manufacturing. This represents the best possible outcome for our business, employees, customers and supply chain partners in the current climate...
The mud-slinging from ADL about the ScotZEB 3 is a bit disingenuous.Ach... well as has been said, not surprising, particularly given ADL's pretty dismal showing in the ScotZEB 3 awards round, but still sad.
www.route-one.net
The funding amounts are as follows:
Applicant Subsidy awarded Number of vehicles Number of chargers Vehicle breakdown Ember £13,174,147 100 43 100 coaches (Yutong) Stagecoach £4,568,280.40 44 25 Seven coaches (Yutong)
21 single-deck buses (Yutong)
16 double-deck buses (Yutong)Rock Road £11,500,317.08 93 101 69 single-deck buses (Alexander Dennis)
10 single-deck buses (Wrightbus)
14 double-deck buses (Alexander Dennis)Lothian £9,567,260 60 88 40 double-deck buses (Alexander Dennis/Volvo)
20 double-deck buses (Wrightbus)First Bus £5,989,966 37 38 15 repowered buses
22 double-deck buses (Yutong)
Exactly. If you exclude coaches, ADL did very well...The mud-slinging from ADL about the ScotZEB 3 is a bit disingenuous.
It only looks like they did badly because of Ember's bid for 100 coaches. Of course, ADL don't make coaches, having put Plaxton into hiatus a couple of years ago.
![]()
Scotland allocates £45 million for coach and bus as ScotZEB3 concludes
The latest funding round concludes the ScotZEB programme and will support 334 zero-emission vehicles across Scotland, including coacheswww.route-one.net
| Brand | Single Deck | Double Deck | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yutong | 21 | 38 | 59 |
| ADL | 69 | 54 | 123 |
| Wright | 10 | 20 | 30 |
| Repowers | 15* | 15 |
ADL took ages to get it out, it missed the last ZEBRA-wave & Stagecoach cancelled some of its E200EV orders due to ADL missing milestones. However, ADL has the most orders for single-deckers in ScotZEB3.Even now the 200 version is struggling
I also reckon that National Express won't abandon Caetano given their new e.Levante range.National Express has shown clear interest in electric coaches - I reckon we'll see a lot of growth in the coming years.
MCI in Leyland. I don't understand why they didn't keep Guildford.Wasn't there also some outsourcing of chassis manufacturing to another company in the UK at one point? I forget the name.
I mean with an all refreshed Electric Bus range, arguably they should have the design / R&D capacity to do so if they wished, but that would involve investing money and time into it?I assume this also put's Plaxton further into the deathbed then with one less site to use
Guildford had two large buildings, one was more a foundry and welding building making the chassis frame, the other was chassis assembly (adding all the wiring, pipes, suspension, engines etc).MCI in Leyland. I don't understand why they didn't keep Guildford.
I'd assume they will have to be delivered to Merseyside and the LCR would have to sort out somewhere to store them???So now where will the E400EV's for Liverpool go to since Falkirk's closed down?
The Panther is now quite outdated; it's a design from 1999 with some facelifts, small changes, and adaptations for the changing Volvo chassis. The Leopard was doing better recently, likely due to increased PSVAR requirements.arguably they should have the design / R&D capacity to do so if they wished, but that would involve investing money and time into it?
I agree that we'll see eLevantes, but National Express did permit Plaxton Elite orders in the past. The relationship with Caetano has been far less exclusive since the failure of the Boa Vista, with NX ordering (but never receiving) Van Hool Altanos, and trialling electric Yutongs.I also reckon that National Express won't abandon Caetano given their new e.Levante range.
Geographically, I can see why ADL would want to move chassis production nearer their bodying plants. Though that begs the question why they didn't close Scarborough instead of Falkirk, and concentrated it all in Scotland?Guildford had two large buildings, one was more a foundry and welding building making the chassis frame, the other was chassis assembly (adding all the wiring, pipes, suspension, engines etc).
The assembly building had an open day 7 years ago which was really interesting.
![]()
Popular open day at Alexander Dennis in Guildford raises £1,600 for charities | Alexander Dennis
An estimated 3,000 people attended the open day at the Alexander Dennis bus chassis factory in Guildford on Saturday 11th May. The opportunity to look behind the scenes at Britain’s biggest bus manufacturer was enthusiastically embraced by local residents as well as visitors from as far afield...www.alexander-dennis.com
I think some office and sales staff subsequently moved to Farnborough
i suspect because the buildings at Falkirk are in very poor condition, and the site is large and rather jumbled. The workforce at Scarborough is also rather more flexible I understand.Geographically, I can see why ADL would want to move chassis production nearer their bodying plants. Though that begs the question why they didn't close Scarborough instead of Falkirk, and concentrated it all in Scotland?
Apparently, ADL have declined any current interest in doing that. Can someone confirm?ADL really need to be working on an integral electric coach or bodying the coach variant of the Volvo BZR chassis, now. National Express has shown clear interest in electric coaches - I reckon we'll see a lot of growth in the coming years.
While it would have been a good start, I suspect to develope both an electric chassis and new body would require more investment than would be warranted with a 100 coach order and there would be no guarantee of substantial follow on order, considering that ADL/Plaxton was really a UK only company when it came to coaches. It may have been worth it for a body only deal on someone else's chassis but the coach market seems fragmented and highly bespoke these days and no guarantee that any chassis producer would partner with them. It would also have consumed a lot of Scarborough capacity which of course would have meant some bus production would need to have moved to Falkirk.Plaxton really needs a big customer to launch a new coach, the 100 electric coach order from Ember would've been great...
I would presume so, Alexander Dennis is a popular company for bus companies. I would imagine they would move their head office to somewhere like ScarboroughWithout Falkirk, is there must room for future expansion?
Without Falkirk, is there must room for future expansion?
Indeed: on a visit to Falkirk about a decade ago we were told that the roof of the main assembly building has leaked for years, and there's no way of fixing it without suspending production. For all these reasons investment in recent years seems to have been concentrated in Scarborough.i suspect because the buildings at Falkirk are in very poor condition, and the site is large and rather jumbled. The workforce at Scarborough is also rather more flexible I understand.