• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Railcards users to face additional checks when buying tickets

Status
Not open for further replies.

James H

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2014
Messages
1,544
I was impressed by SNCF's railcard integration - I was able to buy a railcard in advance to start on the first day of my travel (so my 12 month validity didn't start till I actually travelled). But I couldn't buy the ticket without being sure of having a valid railcard at the time of travel.

Obviously SNCF is more integrated than the GB system as it stands today, but these things are possible.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,919
I would imagine in those days they'd have sold you a post-dated railcard with your tickets.
From what I remember of those halcyon days in the 90s queueing up to buy our annual holiday tickets to Devon (good year) or Norfolk (less good :lol:) at the Intercity travel centre my mum used to just make sure her railcard was in date when she bought the tickets and also when she wanted to travel, I think she did the annual renewal at the same time to save a visit.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,486
I find it fascinating that a reasonable announcement on making Delay Repay easier is used to cover an anti-passenger announcement on railcard use. When that announcement limiting rights is framed as dealing with over aggressive enforcement, the bull**** detector went on absolute overdrive.

Let’s be absolutely clear. This announcement, when combined with others, is proof that GBR will operate on the basis that railway revenue is like tax, and any issue over payment will be viewed through an enforcement lens, not a commercial one.
 
Joined
7 Aug 2025
Messages
357
Location
Portsmouth
So if we are "verifying" our railcards... can we have a QR code or something to scan / contactlass card tech? the touchscreen ticket machines are bad enough as it for typing, let alone a long id code!
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
4,623
Location
Greater Manchester
So if we are "verifying" our railcards... can we have a QR code or something to scan / contactlass card tech? the touchscreen ticket machines are bad enough as it for typing, let alone a long id code!
(Digital) Railcards already have a scanable code on them.
Although Ticket Machines will probably need amendments if they are going to read them.
 

embers25

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2009
Messages
2,175
So if we are "verifying" our railcards... can we have a QR code or something to scan / contactlass card tech? the touchscreen ticket machines are bad enough as it for typing, let alone a long id code!
My railcard number is 15 digits, there is next to no chance of being able to type that in on a machine without either making an error or the machine having one of those numbers that doesn't press correctly. It would also mean each transaction will take much longer and so we'll need more machines. An old or partially sighted person would really struggle with this too. Scanning is fine, if the scanner actually works and hasn't been vandalised.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Shows how much revenue protection have actually trained to do revenue protection if they aren't scanning it!
SWR and GWR generally both scan railcards at least 50% of the time, even if you have a paper ticket with no barcode.
 

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
15,217
As a former booking clerk, way way back in BR days, railcards were not issued pre-dated. They were issued to start on the day of sale/issue.
I think, but may be wrong, that there was something like a 3 (or maybe 7) day leeway for (continuation) renewals.
Thanks for sharing that knowledge
 

sefyllian

Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
138
May be worth reading the official announcement rather than relying on AI slop from local newspapers.

Delay Repay changes will make rail travel easier under Great British Railways​

These changes allow passengers to claim Delay Repay compensation faster and the rail industry to invest in improvements across the UK.
From:Department for Transport, Office of Rail and Road and The Rt Hon Heidi Alexander MPPublished17 March 2026
  • under Great British Railways, it will be quicker and easier to claim for Delay Repay compensation
  • passengers will be able to claim compensation more directly through third-party retailers like Trainline for the first time
  • revenue protection measures are introduced for industry, helping to restore trust in the railway
For the first time, rail passengers will be able to claim Delay Repay directly from wherever they buy their ticket, making it quicker and easier to apply for compensation.
Currently, passengers have to contend with a complex system across 14 different train companies, which creates confusion and frustration.
As part of the government’s plans to simplify our railways and ensure passengers are treated fairly when travelling, compensation claim systems for delayed trains will be merged into one easy-to-use service under Great British Railways (GBR).
Customers will also be able to apply through third-party retailers like Trainline.
It comes as the government responds to the recommendations of the Office of Rail and Road’s (ORR) review into revenue protection practices, outlining new measures such as making ticket terms and conditions clearer.
Every year, at least £350 million of taxpayers’ money is lost from fare-dodging on the rail network, which negatively impacts passenger experiences across the country and means money that could be spent improving services is being lost to fraud.
Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander, said:
Using the railway will be simpler and more reliable under Great British Railways. When services are delayed, passengers should be able to easily claim the compensation they’re owed.
These necessary changes will ensure people can claim Delay Repay compensation more quickly and the industry can invest taxpayers’ money in the things that really matter for passengers; freezing fares and delivering train and station upgrades, rather than losing out to fare dodgers and fraud.
Cracking down on fare-dodging and stamping out fraud will protect honest passengers and taxpayers and fund improvements like essential network upgrades and maintenance.
To do this, the government’s response to the ORR’s review sets out new measures to tackle fare dodging, protect honest customers and stop money being lost to fraud.
Trials for a new scheme are also beginning later in the year to check railcards are being used properly. If the trial proves successful, railcard users will need to complete a simple validation check, saving taxpayers around £20 million a year.
From 1 April 2026, unused tickets will only be eligible for a refund up to 23:59 on the day they become valid for travel, preventing fraud where people ask for their money back even though they have used a service – a change that will save around £40 million annually. With all these changes, those who make genuine mistakes can feel confident they will be treated fairly.
Jacqueline Starr, Executive Chair and CEO of Rail Delivery Group, said:
It’s important that customers can claim compensation when their journey is disrupted, and Delay Repay is there to make sure customers can receive money back when delays happen. The government’s plan to develop a consolidated Delay Repay service will make it easier for all customers to request compensation, regardless of where they bought their ticket, with a more consistent process for reviewing and processing all claims.
Jody Ford, CEO of Trainline, said:
Making compensation easier when you need it is a win for passengers. Wherever you buy your ticket, the focus must be on getting more people to choose rail. These future changes to Delay Repay have real potential to support that ambition and will be welcomed by millions.
Ben Plowden, CEO, Campaign for Better Transport, said:
The establishment of Great British Railways offers a generational opportunity to get more people travelling by train, more affordably, more often, to more places.
We know that cost is the biggest barrier to rail travel, but the confusing and fragmented fares and ticketing system also urgently needs reform, so this is welcome news for passengers and potential passengers.
Independent retailers such as Trainline have often led the way on innovation, so successful rail reform has to be collaborative, learning the best lessons from across the industry. Enabling access to delay repay through all retailers is a good example of the sort of cross-sector collaboration which will be key to GBR’s potential success.
This is another important step in delivering services that are affordable and reliable, putting passengers at the heart of GBR after fares were frozen for the first time in 30 years.
Step by step, the government is rebuilding a railway that passengers can be proud of and rely on. Action is also being taken to tackle the root causes of poor performance, moving more train operating companies into public ownership and delivering the Railways Bill to ensure passengers can benefit from a railway that gets it right first time.

Note “Customers will also be able to apply through third-party retailers like Trainline” (my emphasis).

It doesn’t sound like you’ll be forced to use the original retailer, only that you’ll be able to, and behind the scenes all delay repay systems are being merged into one central system that both retailers and TOCs can access.
 

WesternLancer

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
15,217
I find it fascinating that a reasonable announcement on making Delay Repay easier is used to cover an anti-passenger announcement on railcard use. When that announcement limiting rights is framed as dealing with over aggressive enforcement, the bull**** detector went on absolute overdrive.

Let’s be absolutely clear. This announcement, when combined with others, is proof that GBR will operate on the basis that railway revenue is like tax, and any issue over payment will be viewed through an enforcement lens, not a commercial one.
Good observations here.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,126
Location
Wilmslow
I’m a bit confused by how the new buying process will improve things for purchases of advanced where the travel date is after the expiry of the railcard.

Yes, you can prove you have a railcard at point of purchase and it was in date. But by the date of travel it isn’t, so what does that do to improve the situation for the vast majority of the people we see here getting in trouble for railcards a week out of date when they travel?

Will it become an issue that where the railcard is renewed between purchase and travel that the railcard number on the ticket is different to the number on the railcard carried?
The devil will be in the detail, as you say.

If railcards need to be proved “valid” at time of purchase, then they don’t work for advance tickets. Yes, they can be checked again at time of use, but this doesn’t prevent discounted tickets being used without valid railcards at time of use.

If the railcard details are added to the ticket, there has to be an “or equivalent newer/replacement railcard”

If the railcard isn’t validated at time of purchase, because it’s just a reminder, then nothing really changes, for those of us who only buy railcards when we need to.

And I’m not sure that railcards can be “validated” at purchase time anyway, but I may be wrong in this.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,486
May be worth reading the official announcement rather than relying on AI slop from local newspapers.



Note “Customers will also be able to apply through third-party retailers like Trainline” (my emphasis).

It doesn’t sound like you’ll be forced to use the original retailer, only that you’ll be able to, and behind the scenes all delay repay systems are being merged into one central system that both retailers and TOCs can access.
I've just looked quickly at the referenced report, and its recommendations. I struggle to see the line of thought from these
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,553
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
It doesn’t sound like you’ll be forced to use the original retailer, only that you’ll be able to, and behind the scenes all delay repay systems are being merged into one central system that both retailers and TOCs can access.

A single DR clearing house will certainly save money from duplication of staffing etc. Though may make edge cases harder to deal with as unlike if it sits within a TOC the TOC customer services won't be able to just tell them to cough up.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,498
Location
LBK
Load of bumph advertising Trainline which is depressing. Even the CEO.of the Campaign for Better Transport name dropping them. Sigh!
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,126
Location
Wilmslow
Indeed,
Trials for a new scheme are also beginning later in the year to check railcards are being used properly. If the trial proves successful, railcard users will need to complete a simple validation check, saving taxpayers around £20 million a year.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,498
Location
LBK
It seems unlikely any actual verification will take place (there is no database with "all railcards"), so you will be able to enter a specimen or nonsense railcard number and be allowed to purchase far in advance. But woe betide you if you don't renew or buy the railcard by the time of travel.
 

saismee

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2023
Messages
1,737
Location
UK
For online bookings in advance when no railcard is held that is valid at the time of travel, they could prevent download until the railcard was confirmed.
That sounds wildly customer unfriendly. "Give us money but in order to use the service you also have to give us even more money, and also your ticket is nonrefundable"

It is unfortunate to lose booking in advance, but it almost certainly will reduce fraud and protect innocent customers from letting their railcards expire.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,486
A single DR clearing house will certainly save money from duplication of staffing etc. Though may make edge cases harder to deal with as unlike if it sits within a TOC the TOC customer services won't be able to just tell them to cough up.
And with the mentality displayed in the railcard part of the announcement, one that we should all be concerned about.
 

mmh

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2016
Messages
4,284
A single DR clearing house will certainly save money from duplication of staffing etc. Though may make edge cases harder to deal with as unlike if it sits within a TOC the TOC customer services won't be able to just tell them to cough up.
Ultimately though TOCs will be "going", to become pseudo-regions, so customer services is likely to eventually be centralised, or at least centrally controlled. Although who knows - even the brave new nationalised world may well want an internal market to carry on the pointlessness of one tax funded body cross-charging another tax funded body.
 
Joined
7 Aug 2025
Messages
357
Location
Portsmouth
My railcard number is 15 digits, there is next to no chance of being able to type that in on a machine without either making an error or the machine having one of those numbers that doesn't press correctly. It would also mean each transaction will take much longer and so we'll need more machines. An old or partially sighted person would really struggle with this too. Scanning is fine, if the scanner actually works and hasn't been vandalised.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


SWR and GWR generally both scan railcards at least 50% of the time, even if you have a paper ticket with no barcode.

No one has ever scanned mine, and mainly travel on SWR / SR / GWR
 

mmh

Established Member
Joined
13 Aug 2016
Messages
4,284
All this (potential) faff, and they're only claiming that it could save £20 million?

I fear we've a lot more of this to come - political grandstanding and dubious changes justified by trivial theoretical savings.
 

OscarH

Established Member
Joined
15 Sep 2020
Messages
1,286
Location
Crawley
Load of bumph advertising Trainline which is depressing. Even the CEO.of the Campaign for Better Transport name dropping them. Sigh!
Unfortunate given all retailers have been trying to push for this for years
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,777
What happened to personal responsibility?

What’s next? Having to produce an in date MoT certificate to buy petrol?
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,486
What happened to personal responsibility?

What’s next? Having to produce an in date MoT certificate to buy petrol?
What was interesting in the reporting I've seen was the suggestion that this is the mitigation for over-aggressive enforcement, rather than following the ORR report recommendations on managing eneforcement policies.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,498
Location
LBK
What was interesting in the reporting I've seen was the suggestion that this is the mitigation for over-aggressive enforcement
Almost certainly. Now, if you are caught with an expired railcard, you have almost no excuse, and can more "legitimately" be pursued by way of civil or criminal means.

What happened to personal responsibility?

What’s next? Having to produce an in date MoT certificate to buy petrol?
Given that it isn't a requirement to have an MoT certificate to buy petrol that seems rather daft. Perhaps a better comparison would be renting a car as the main driver and having to show your driving licence to do so (and have it verified in many cases!), something which is not really controversial.
 

sor

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2013
Messages
791
What happened to personal responsibility?

What’s next? Having to produce an in date MoT certificate to buy petrol?
I get the point but tax/insurance/MOT is continuously enforced anyway. If the database says you don't have all three & the car is not SORN'd then you are theoretically targeted for enforcement action. (besides, it's legal to drive to or from a pre-booked MOT test)

In terms of railcards I guess my personal view is that they should offer post-dated railcards and require a validated railcard for discounted purchases. It seems very strange that (as stated elsewhere) there is no central railcard database when there ought to be. I'd hope that at least all digital railcard purchases and all physical railcards purchased through the official website are recorded centrally?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,553
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I find it strange that we had a thread not long ago where people were suggesting pretty much exactly what is proposed, with the one issue raised as being the issue of purchase a long way in advance*, and now the railway is proposing to actually do pretty much exactly what was suggested on here people are now up in arms about it as some kind of overreach or surveillance?

* When tickets were mostly only available from booking offices back in the 90s and earlier, a Railcard had to be produced for each discounted ticket. So we're just going back to that, albeit with far more advance purchase which affects the effect (!) of it.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

In terms of railcards I guess my personal view is that they should offer post-dated railcards and require a validated railcard for discounted purchases. It seems very strange that (as stated elsewhere) there is no central railcard database when there ought to be. Surely all digital railcard purchases and all physical railcards purchased through the official website are recorded centrally?

They're not, but I'm sure under GBR they will be. Large IT projects take time, if rushed they are usually rubbish.
 

ChilliSauce

On Moderation
Joined
28 Oct 2025
Messages
328
Frankly I'm amazed that they haven't scrapped railcards yet anyway.
I agree the complete portfolio of different rail cards needs to be scrapped, its a right dogs breakfast of confusion and in certain age groups discrimination.

Just replace it with 1 single Railcard ...

1 card per person that crucially anyone and everyone can buy, if they wish, and it gives 1/3 off the fare being purchased.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top