Harlequinuk
On Moderation
6Q39 @ Lincoln 99002 on freight
Therefore it would be a ride issue and ONE empty wagon would mean the whole train would be classed as empty for safety reasons.I believe it is something to do with the suspension on a certain type of wagon (twin single deck, single axle), but it has been a long time since I have dealt with those trains.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
From what I remember, Fords only put out wagons that were in use.
Nice and noisy !!!6Q39 @ Lincoln 99002 on freight
The whole train wouldn't be classed as empty, but yes the whole train would be speed restricted if it had one or more empty wagons of that type.Therefore it would be a ride issue and ONE empty wagon would mean the whole train would be classed as empty for safety reasons.
Fair enough, that is what I was getting at.The whole train wouldn't be classed as empty, but yes the whole train would be speed restricted if it had one or more empty wagons of that type.
Would it be acceptable to ballast the wagon to allow the higher speed?The whole train wouldn't be classed as empty, but yes the whole train would be speed restricted if it had one or more empty wagons of that type.
It's an optical illusion caused by the tapered ends and the colour contrast.The 99s somehow look taller and thinner than all other UK locos, when viewed head on. But this must just be a kind of illusion, as I imagine all locos will pretty much fill out the full loading gauge?
It is, yes, thank you.I really hope people reading this find the info helpful.
Yes, appreciated.Upcoming workings planned for 99001, 99002 or 99004 are as follows subject to all the usual caveats:
Today
6Q40 Peterborough - Doncaster Decoy via Spalding and Lincoln Central:
Realtime Trains | 6Q40 1510 Peterborough North Yd Gbrf to Doncaster Down Decoy Gbrf | 05/03/2026
Real-time train running information for 6Q40 1510 departure from Peterborough North Yd Gbrf to Doncaster Down Decoy Gbrf on 05/03/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
6Q41 Doncaster Decoy - Peterborough via the ECML:
Realtime Trains | 6Q41 1750 Doncaster Down Decoy Gbrf to Peterborough North Yd Gbrf | 05/03/2026
Real-time train running information for 6Q41 1750 departure from Doncaster Down Decoy Gbrf to Peterborough North Yd Gbrf on 05/03/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
6Q42 Peterborough - March via Whittlesea:
Realtime Trains | 6Q42 2245 Peterborough North Yd Gbrf to March Up Yard Gbrf | 05/03/2026
Real-time train running information for 6Q42 2245 departure from Peterborough North Yd Gbrf to March Up Yard Gbrf on 05/03/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
NOTE: If 99002 works 6Q40 like it has all week, 6Q41 or 6Q42 will be 99002's 99th working that it was involved in. It isn't known precisely which one it is due to the mystery of 0Q99 Leicester - Leicester on 27/11/25.
Tomorrow
0Q37 March - Peterborough via Manea and Whittlesea (whichever 99 works all the above works this):
Realtime Trains | 0Q37 0055 March Up Yard Gbrf to Peterborough North Yd Gbrf | 06/03/2026
Real-time train running information for 0Q37 0055 departure from March Up Yard Gbrf to Peterborough North Yd Gbrf on 06/03/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
0Q75 Peterborough - Leicester via Oakham in daylight throughout:
Realtime Trains | 0Q75 1226 Peterboro Maint Shed Gbrf to Leicester L.I.P. | 06/03/2026
Real-time train running information for 0Q75 1226 departure from Peterboro Maint Shed Gbrf to Leicester L.I.P. on 06/03/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
4Q04 Peterborough - Ipswich via March, Ely and Stowmarket:
Realtime Trains | 4Q04 1807 Peterborough North Yd Gbrf to Ipswich Reception Gbrf | 06/03/2026
Real-time train running information for 4Q04 1807 departure from Peterborough North Yd Gbrf to Ipswich Reception Gbrf on 06/03/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
Saturday
4Q18 Ipswich - Temple Mills Loop via the GEML:
Realtime Trains | 4Q18 2340 Ipswich S.S. to Temple Mills Loop | 06/03/2026
Real-time train running information for 4Q18 2340 departure from Ipswich S.S. to Temple Mills Loop on 06/03/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
4Q25 Temple Mills Loop - Ipswich via the GEML:
Realtime Trains | 4Q25 0225 Temple Mills Loop to Ipswich Reception Gbrf | 07/03/2026
Real-time train running information for 4Q25 0225 departure from Temple Mills Loop to Ipswich Reception Gbrf on 07/03/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
4Q19 Ipswich - Temple Mills Loop via the GEML:
Realtime Trains | 4Q19 0416 Ipswich Reception Gbrf to Temple Mills Loop | 07/03/2026
Real-time train running information for 4Q19 0416 departure from Ipswich Reception Gbrf to Temple Mills Loop on 07/03/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
0Q19 Temple Mills Loop - Peterborough via Broxbourne, Audley End, Cambridge, Ely and March in mostly daylight:
Realtime Trains | 0Q19 0635 Temple Mills Loop to Peterboro Maint Shed Gbrf | 07/03/2026
Real-time train running information for 0Q19 0635 departure from Temple Mills Loop to Peterboro Maint Shed Gbrf on 07/03/2026. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
I really hope people reading this find the info helpful. If anyone knows which 99 (001 or 002) led 0Q98 Leicester - Peterborough on Monday I would still like to know please.
I would see no reason why not.Would it be acceptable to ballast the wagon to allow the higher speed?
Not as far as I know. 0Q75 had a path for both Wednesday and Friday but was cancelled both days.Yes, appreciated.
Question - is there one missing on tomorrow after 0Q75 and before 4Q04 ?.
99001, 99004, 66301, 66713Not as far as I know. 0Q75 had a path for both Wednesday and Friday but was cancelled both days.
4Q04 will run. 99001, 99002 and 99004 all to choose from at Peterborough.
Next week there will be more of the same runs as there were this week between Peterborough and Doncaster, but with different timings. A 99 will collect the wagons from March yard again.
It is now stopped at Stowmarket and will be there until 2230 due to being too long to fit into the Ipswich reception!I believe 4Q04 has had a couple of issues en-route to Ipswich that have caused some small delays. Not sure what the issues were, but 4Q04 is on the move again now approaching Stowmarket.
How can they keep messing up the length and being too long to fit in Ipswich RS1. I can understand it happening once but now multiple times?It is now stopped at Stowmarket and will be there until 2230 due to being too long to fit into the Ipswich reception!
Trains are now running both directions on P2 at Stowmarket.
I don't know but there were some very grumpy people at Stowmarket who were messed around back and forth over the awful temporary footbridge to get their train. Cyclists included.How can they keep messing up the length and being too long to fit in Ipswich RS1. I can understand it happening once but now multiple times?
This YouTube video is saying there was an issue with the DSD at March and an adhesion issue on the gradient approaching Elmswell (where the video was filmed). In the video, you can hear they've got both 001 and 004 under power, presumably to overcome the gradient.I believe 4Q04 has had a couple of issues en-route to Ipswich that have caused some small delays. Not sure what the issues were, but 4Q04 is on the move again now approaching Stowmarket.
I really hope people reading this find the info helpful.
Tops list for 4Q18 shows total weight of 2374 tons against maximum authorised load of 2450 tons
Would a single 66 have also slipped to a stand on the same section with the same weight and conditions?
Or they deliberately stopped to see how a single 99 would cope from a standing start. That would be my preferred test.Yes, the train document includes the weight of the hauling loco(s) so 2261 trailing + 113 tons for the hauling loco = 2374. I would guess the authorised maximum loads for the 99s are being input to cover the requirements of the planned testing until something more official is eventually worked out and the capabilities of the locos are understood.
The Ian Allan gradient profile book shows Elmswell at the top of a 1-in-159 climb, which isn't normally a concern for a 66. Loads book has the standard trailing weight for a 66 as 2430 tons, or 3010 tons for the "66H" loading (used for specially authorised loads) on this section of line.
I'm not sure what the situation was with 4Q04 in the video. 4Q04 lost 14 minutes between Bury St Edmunds and Haughley Junction - Elmswell is only 3 or 4 miles from Haughley Junction and all the delay from Bury St Edmunds to Ipswich has been attributed to the length issue at Ipswich mentioned in post #1426. Judging from the open trains time map, CO691 signal at the end of the platform at Elmswell is the penultimate one before the junction, so I wonder if 4Q04 was being signal checked before they decided to let it move forward to Stowmarket? Or perhaps approaching Elmswell running slowly on adverse signals caused a problem with adhesion... not sure.
Urgent request if I may please.
1. Does anyone know which 99 led 0Q98 Leicester - Peterborough yesterday between 99005 and 99006? An urgent request because it was the first move under its own power for whichever 99 led!
2. Does anyone know if 0Q98 actually went via Peterborough station? I have doubts considering these moves don't normally.
From a photo I have seen 99006 ledUrgent request if I may please.
1. Does anyone know which 99 led 0Q98 Leicester - Peterborough yesterday between 99005 and 99006? An urgent request because it was the first move under its own power for whichever 99 led!