Indeed. The only difference is that she appears to be slightly less belligerent towards the Trump administration - in that she doesn't show off that she's got better dance moves than DJT."Meet the new boss, same as the old boss" energy.
Indeed. The only difference is that she appears to be slightly less belligerent towards the Trump administration - in that she doesn't show off that she's got better dance moves than DJT."Meet the new boss, same as the old boss" energy.
Trump replaces Noem
US President Donald Trump has announced he is replacing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
Noem, who has led Trump's immigration drive, will be replaced with Republican Senator Markwayne Mullin, Trump says.
"The current Secretary, Kristi Noem, who has served us well, and has had numerous and spectacular results," Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
He added that Noem will now shift to a newly established position, the Special Envoy for The Shield of the Americas, which Trump said was a "new Security Initiative in the Western Hemisphere"
He added that Noem will now shift to a newly established position, the Special Envoy for The Shield of the Americas, which Trump said was a "new Security Initiative in the Western Hemisphere"
Possibly Trump's personnel management skills on display there then.Noem is speaking now at conference in Nashville, Tennessee.
It's unclear if she knew about Trump's Truth Social post announcing her replacement before she took to the stage.
She's so far used the event to speak about her record on the border, the number of drug arrests she says the administration has made, and its efforts the lower murder rate.
Kristi Noem's got the chop:
![]()
Trump replaces Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem
Donald Trump replaces Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem with Republican senator Markwayne Mullin.www.bbc.co.uk
There is not a great deal about him on Wikipedia, but curiously he is a member of the Cherokee Nation; perhaps they are hoping that will soften the blow somehow. He appears to be a Trump loyalist (well, he would be, wouldn’t he), but there is nothing about his religion, although some of his beliefs suggest very reactionary Christianity. He also appears to be a martial arts enthusiast.
No real change there.
In the 60-minute debate, which was hosted and broadcast by News 9 and News on 6, both candidates took far-right positions on abortion when asked about the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on that subject. Both Shannon and Mullin favor a national ban on abortion, and neither candidate said exceptions should be made when the mother’s life is at risk, or in cases of rape or incest.
The candidates’ remarks came on the same evening that 59 percent of voters in neighboring Kansas rejected a constitutional change that would have allowed its Legislature to pass laws banning abortion altogether in that state.
Mullin, who has six children, praised recent abortion restrictions signed by Gov. Kevin Stitt.
“Absolutely I would,” Mullin said when asked if he would favor a national ban on abortion. “Someone is going to love that baby. You know, with the father of three adopted children, I can tell you there is no difference between those we chose to bring into the family and those that came natural. We love all six of them equally. My fight is to make sure we protect every single baby out there. I commend our Oklahoma state legislators for having such a strong law. I’m excited that we’re going to actually end killing babies in Oklahoma. But babies in California and babies in Massachusetts are just as important.”
Mullin also said he opposes any exceptions to an abortion ban, even if the life of the mother is at risk. He appeared to imply his own wife would opt against getting an abortion even if her life were in immediate danger.
“When it comes to the death of the mother or the child, I can tell you without question where my wife would be on this,” Mullin said. “There’s no way my wife would sit and say that my life is more important than my child. Just like I would lay my life down for my child in a heartbeat, my wife would do the same.”
Just another distraction, something particularly damaging must be about to dropInteresting that Noem got axed for among other things her incompetent suspension of TSA Pre and GlobalEntry, but GlobalEntry remains suspended (a personal annoyance!).
I wonder how long videos of her will still be played at security checkpoints at every airport. I've been finding that slightly dystopian as well.
I wonder how long videos of her will still be played at security checkpoints at every airport. I've been finding that slightly dystopian as well.
No, no, no!! If you left Trump alone with some Crayolas, before you could say "who would use it?" he'd be on here with his plans to connect Colne to Skipton....Is this "Shield of the Americas" in addition to, or instead of, his "Golden Dome"? Also, have the rest of the Americas been consulted?
Maybe they should just put Trump in a pen with some paper and crayons and let him get on with it while the grownups run the country.*
* Yes, yes, I know...![]()
I don't think that's what it was about, as it's been going for ages. Maybe they switched the video to that.I wasn't aware of that but, looking it up, I presume this is the one blaming Democrats for the government shutdown. Sounds like the kind of thing a dictatorship would do.
Interesting that Noem got axed for among other things her incompetent suspension of TSA Pre and GlobalEntry, but GlobalEntry remains suspended (a personal annoyance!).
I wonder how long videos of her will still be played at security checkpoints at every airport. I've been finding that slightly dystopian as well.
That's putting it mildly. The (potentially) fraudulent spending in the DHS has been out of this world. Going by memory, thanks to the 'Big Beautiful Bill' the DHS budget is now larger than the military expenditure of entire countries like Greece and Denmark. And last time I checked DHS wasn't buying fighter jets or frigates.Isn't there also some shenanigans going on with money (around $140-200m?) spent on an ad campaign, awarded to someone who set up a business just a couple of weeks ago and worked with her? It's suspected the fee was massively overvalued so there's probably a great deal of money laundering and fraud going on.
When the wheel turns, and it will, all of these Trump loyalists will be ratting each other out for plea bargains.
That's putting it mildly. The (potentially) fraudulent spending in the DHS has been out of this world. Going by memory, thanks to the 'Big Beautiful Bill' the DHS budget is now larger than the military expenditure of countries like Greece and Denmark. And last time I checked DHS wasn't buying fighter jets or frigates.
When the wheel turns, and it will, all of these Trump loyalists will be ratting each other out for plea bargains.
Frankly, I don't think he has any hands on the wheel, and the maniacs, are just pulling at the wheel until it does hit a big wall, and takes out everyone on the Trump bus,No, no, no!! If you left Trump alone with some Crayolas, before you could say "who would use it?" he'd be on here with his plans to connect Colne to Skipton....
Seriously though, shipping him back to Mar A Largo to just cheat his mates a golf wouldn't be the worst idea. I'm seriously starting to get the impression that he doesn't have much of a clue what's happening around him, and just reacts to the moment. The whole Iran war, not a war, regime change, not regime change, short term operation, in it for the long run, flip-flopping demonstrates to me that he doesn't have both hands on the wheel, and is being pulled left and right by those around him. This is a far more dangerous situation than if he were just a power crazed maniac (which to be fair he is), because there are many maniacs all pulling at the wheel whilst the bus accelerates towards a brick wall.
Give them time, give them time.And last time I checked DHS wasn't buying fighter jets or frigates.
The US Coast Guard is part of DHS, so they certainly are buying frigates.That's putting it mildly. The (potentially) fraudulent spending in the DHS has been out of this world. Going by memory, thanks to the 'Big Beautiful Bill' the DHS budget is now larger than the military expenditure of entire countries like Greece and Denmark. And last time I checked DHS wasn't buying fighter jets or frigates.
I get your point, but while they are buying ships, they're not frigates. As far as I know Coast Guard cutters don't have missile launch tubes nor are they armed with torpedoes.The US Coast Guard is part of DHS, so they certainly are buying frigates.
They're the size of frigates, and the current Legend-class cutters are likely to be the basis of the next generation of US Navy frigates, by adding those weapon systems you mention.I get your point, but while they are buying ships, they're not frigates. As far as I know Coast Guard cutters don't have missile launch tubes nor are they armed with torpedoes.
Assuming that the Navy doesn't screw things up again.They're the size of frigates, and the current Legend-class cutters are likely to be the basis of the next generation of US Navy frigates, by adding those weapon systems you mention.
Oh, without a doubt. There's the oft-quoted "Don't ascribe to malice that which is sufficiently explained by incompetence."There are reasons why public procurement projects go wrong that aren't related to corruption. For example I haven't seen any allegations of corruption at HS2*.
As I understand it the US Navy has a long and honourable history of overspending and underdelivering, going back well before Trump.Oh, without a doubt. There's the oft-quoted "Don't ascribe to malice that which is sufficiently explained by incompetence."
But this is the Trump administration we're talking about, so there's no reason that both can't be true!
Indeed, the adage could work backwards with him. Bankrupting three casinos could be pretty extreme incompetence. Or is it more likely that it was an embezzlement scam?Oh, without a doubt. There's the oft-quoted "Don't ascribe to malice that which is sufficiently explained by incompetence."
But this is the Trump administration we're talking about, so there's no reason that both can't be true!
Indeed, that applies pretty much across the DoD - $800 hammers come to mind.As I understand it the US Navy has a long and honourable history of overspending and underdelivering, going back well before Trump.