redreni
Established Member
I'm just weighing up whether to claim just for the delayed leg of my journey (50% DR on a £35 ticket) or for the whole journey (50% DR on a combination of tickets worth £40). There's no difference in the length of the delay whether you consider the whole journey or just the delayed segment. The split ticket involves ending short on the £5 ticket at Paddington, Stratford or Abbey Wood, changing trains there and then continuing on an Advance Single from that station.Wasn't the old reading elsewhere tantamount to you can get out but you can't come back in?
As I know too well with your constant drive to get TfL to sort themselves out, not what was going on the ground with the crossrail.
That being said I can't see them moaning about the 'terminii' of the crossrail core. It is one of those things where no answer will be definitive. I mean that in the sense you or someone makes the claim and they pay out is no 100% confirmation of the clause or validty, gate staff will make their mind up on the prevailing wind and anyone in an office will bareface lie to you for 12 months whilst FOIing them
It is the operator of the longer segment covered by the Advance, not TfL, that caused the delay and will have to consider the delay repay claim. It can be a struggle, at the best of times, to get them to recognise that they need to pay on the through journey not just their own segment, and to understand it's a valid split even though there's some overlapping validity. I'm happy to go back and forth with them if necessary until they understand that, but I would like to be sure the split doesn't fall foul of 16.5 as that could invalidate the whole claim.
I guess "between place A and place B" is inherently ambiguous, and I didn't write it, so ambiguity should not go against me.
For the sake of £2.50 I might leave it. I definitely wouldn't want the ticket in question to go up in price.

