• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Transport for Wales Class 231 / 756 Stadler FLIRTs

Caaardiff

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2019
Messages
1,398
How would a 756 work to bristol if theyre to be run as extensions of cardiff terminators from west wales?
They won't. The only confirmed plans for Bristol services is the 2 hourly originating in West Wales. Everything else is rumour.
I dont see why another Cardiff originating Bristol service is necessary. Whats needed is an hourly from Swansea, or further west, which the Stadlers can't do.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
6,046
So if the electric is off for the Caerphilly line, that also means the Coryton line has to be switched off? Wonder what will happen when there's no 150s to step in.

Just close it. There is presumably very little mangement effort involved in doing so since rail replacement buses aren't provided.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,634
They won't. The only confirmed plans for Bristol services is the 2 hourly originating in West Wales. Everything else is rumour.
I dont see why another Cardiff originating Bristol service is necessary. Whats needed is an hourly from Swansea, or further west, which the Stadlers can't do.
Its hardly a rumour - TfW put out a consultation a while back talking about the burns stations and set of new services - either 1tph cardiff to bristol and 1tph cardiff to Cheltenham, or 2tph cardiff to Bristol and 1tph cardiff to Cheltenham, or 2tph for both.

I agree that is different to confirmed, and who knows the services being extended from west Wales could be the start of these extra services - but of course 1tp2h is no where near enough (especially when the consultation had one option for an extra 4tph in total for both bristol and Cheltenham).

But it certainly isn't just a rumour, its what TfW stated they wanted to do in order to support the new stations.
 
Last edited:
Joined
21 Aug 2019
Messages
156
Location
Newport
Its hardly a rumour - TfW put out a consultation a while back talking about the burns stations and set of new services - either 1tph cardiff to bristol and 1tph cardiff to Cheltenham, or 2tph cardiff to Bristol and 1tph cardiff to Cheltenham, or 2tph for both.

I agree that is different to confirmed, and who knows the services being extended from west Wales could be the start of these extra services - but of course 1tp2h is no where near enough (especially when the consultation had one option for an extra 4tph in total for both bristol and Cheltenham).

But it certainly isn't just a rumour, its what TfW stated they wanted to do in order to support the new stations.
TfW also put in an open access request to run a Bristol service. I'm not sure where it got but it's still being referred to so I assume it at least hasn't been turned down. In its proposal it said it would use class 197s.
 

VR494

Member
Joined
22 Jan 2026
Messages
237
Location
United Kingdom
They won't. The only confirmed plans for Bristol services is the 2 hourly originating in West Wales. Everything else is rumour.
I dont see why another Cardiff originating Bristol service is necessary. Whats needed is an hourly from Swansea, or further west, which the Stadlers can't do.
The 197’s are needed for services in the North Wales and the Marshes.

If tfw can secure the funds for the extension of electrification to Cogan, then more 398’s will be purchased for the Caerphilly-Penarth-Coryton circuit.

The 231 fleet will provide services on Maesteg-Ebbw-Cheltenham, and 756 are the preferred option for Cardiff to Bristol.

The only services operated by Flirts on the valley lines long term at the moment will be those to Rhymney.

If I'm not mistaken the 398’s are already route cleared to Ystrad Mynach.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
6,046
If tfw can secure the funds for the extension of electrification to Cogan, then more 398’s will be purchased for the Caerphilly-Penarth-Coryton circuit.

The FLIRTs are lovely trains but not in my view particularly appropriate for the Penarth-Coryton-Caerphilly circuit.

But if TfW is planning on extending the fleet of 398s that suggests they have some confidence that the problems that have been described can be rectified. It's one thing finding you've bought something that doesn't do the job it was supposed to properly - another thing deciding to buy more.

Though presumably increasing the range over which 398s and 756s interwork does reduce resiliance if one type can't rescue the other.
 

positron

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2022
Messages
735
Location
Cardiff
The 756s would also be a potentially good option for the proposed stoppers to Abergavenny, or even the stoppers around the Swansea area.

Both mentioned in a recent Tfw document.

Though I don't want to get too speculative.

I think it's clear though that the 3 car 756s are probably best used elsewhere and the Coryton line is pretty perfect for the 398s.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Are there any updates on the 231s getting pantographs?
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
6,205
Just close it. There is presumably very little mangement effort involved in doing so since rail replacement buses aren't provided.
As it happens, I was talking to my mate about this yesterday. They seemed to run fine all day on Monday on battery with the diesel running to top up the batteries. The issue is the time loss whilst the train is stopped to talk to the signaller. In future, that could be accounted for in an amended schedule. With nothing running to Caerphilly, the trains could run later to Coryton and back. They also have decent dwells at Penarth so the only obstacle is finding a path through Cardiff in the southbound direction. Assuming four minutes later (actually three because the one minute pathing time could be deleted), Queen Street looks okay. From Central they would have to follow the xx09 and xx39 to Barry, rather than precede them, but that's hardly a deal breaker.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
6,046
As it happens, I was talking to my mate about this yesterday. They seemed to run fine all day on Monday on battery with the diesel running to top up the batteries.

Yes and that's quite impressive. And I presume that the power was off on Monday, given that the delays were happening.

The issue is the time loss whilst the train is stopped to talk to the signaller. In future, that could be accounted for in an amended schedule. With nothing running to Caerphilly, the trains could run later to Coryton and back.

The delays do not seem to have been very significant. In fact almost every train on Monday seems to have made up the time by the time it left Queen Street anyway.

What is not obvious to me (but might be if I knew more about railway operations) is why on a railway where drivers don't have to be talked through temporary speed restrictions by a signaller it's necessary for a discussion every time they approach the area where the train wants to use the pantograph but can't.

Especially as it's not even as complex as being able to take power in some places but not others.

I'm not sure it's great PR to bring in new trains with a (most deserved) fanfare and then suddenly remove them without warning, bearing in mind that if someone is just using the Coryton line it's not at all obvious that there is engineering work going on and that therefore things would be expected to return to normal next week.

It may be a coincidence but I don't think it's my imagination that Coryton trains have become significantly busier at peak times since the 756s came in.
 

positron

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2022
Messages
735
Location
Cardiff
I am not sure of it was this forum I read that Stadler want to do the work in Switzerland but TfW want it done in Wales.
Sending them all the way back to Switzerland for what should be a relatively minor upgrade seems very overkill. I know it's not as simple as attaching a pantograph but still feel it should be doable here.
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
2,643
Location
South Staffordshire

tfw756rider

On Moderation
Joined
30 Nov 2024
Messages
2,017
Location
Wales (sometimes in England), thanks for replying!
Maybe they could contract CAF to do it, or lease their workshop space.
Oh yeah. I mean, it's not like CAF haven't worked on Stadler/legacy Stadler products before (their modifications to the 68s to work with the Mk5As).
After the 197 completion and LNER 897 order. what else have CAF to do in their factory ?
Good question. I believe they've actually been assembling trams/trains for Israel? alongside the last few 197s, due to 897 supplier delays. Maybe it would make sense for them to be contracted by Stadler to convert the 231s into bi-modes.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,846
Location
Croydon
Oh yeah. I mean, it's not like CAF haven't worked on Stadler/legacy Stadler products before (their modifications to the 68s to work with the Mk5As).

Good question. I believe they've actually been assembling trams/trains for Israel? alongside the last few 197s, due to 897 supplier delays. Maybe it would make sense for them to be contracted by Stadler to convert the 231s into bi-modes.
My feeling is Stadler will want to do the work in their own workshops. It is after all something that will come with a warranty and no doubt there will be tests of each converted unit following on from the work.

All in all making it not cheap and so not something TfW will easily make a decision on unfortunately.
 

positron

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2022
Messages
735
Location
Cardiff
Stadler should take over the CAF factory anyway, realistically until caf get their act together and launch a level boarding design they will (hopefully) never get another order in the UK. It's likely that Wales will want more Flirts going forwards so getting them built in the UK would be good.
 

Northerngirl

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2023
Messages
521
Location
Wirral
I kind of thought one of the big selling points of them was how easy conversions between power modes are, just Bolt it in and its ready to go
 

Cardiff123

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2013
Messages
1,662
Location
South Wales
Has a 231 made it along to the VoG to Bridgend yet?
I know 231s are destined for the mainline, but presumably 231s will need to use the VoG for mainline diversions
 

positron

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2022
Messages
735
Location
Cardiff
I kind of thought one of the big selling points of them was how easy conversions between power modes are, just Bolt it in and its ready to go
I mean they're DEMUs and they're designed with it in mind so it's actually possible unlike a class 197 or even a voyager.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,874
The 197’s are needed for services in the North Wales and the Marshes.
For now, yes. However, TfW's 'Network North Wales' brochure indicates that they are pushing for North Wales Coast Line electrification by 2035. They will therefore need to get some bi-mode or EMU stock on-order fairly soon to replace the 197s 'up north' and, once those are in service, TfW will be free to cascade those 197s southwards.

If tfw can secure the funds for the extension of electrification to Cogan, then more 398’s will be purchased for the Caerphilly-Penarth-Coryton circuit.

The 231 fleet will provide services on Maesteg-Ebbw-Cheltenham, and 756 are the preferred option for Cardiff to Bristol.

The only services operated by Flirts on the valley lines long term at the moment will be those to Rhymney.
What is the linespeed (main and relief, current and planned, if different) on the GWML between Cardiff and Severn Tunnel Junction? I often forget that the class 756s have a lower maximum speed (75mph) compared to the other UK FLIRT units - perhaps that could be an issue for GWML services? My own view is that any 756s released from Coryton services should be redeployed to oust 398s from the TAM Valleys north of Taff's Well (avoiding the need to order more 398s for the planned Cardiff Bay to Cardiff East on-street.
 

Cardiff123

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2013
Messages
1,662
Location
South Wales
My own view is that any 756s released from Coryton services should be redeployed to oust 398s from the TAM Valleys north of Taff's Well (avoiding the need to order more 398s for the planned Cardiff Bay to Cardiff East on-street.
The chances of this happening are minus 100%, its a complete impossibility.
The upgraded TAM lines were literally built for 398s, and the 398 depot is at Taffs Well for a reason.

I'd love all of south Wales to be a network of 231s and 756s, they are the best trains we've ever had, but that's not the long term plan for the Valleys and it won't ever happen.
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,830
For now, yes. However, TfW's 'Network North Wales' brochure indicates that they are pushing for North Wales Coast Line electrification by 2035. They will therefore need to get some bi-mode or EMU stock on-order fairly soon to replace the 197s 'up north' and, once those are in service, TfW will be free to cascade those 197s southwards.
"Pushing for" and actually happening are two very different things. Electrification of the North Wales coast is one of those things that sounds great but would technically be very challenging - or in other words, very expensive. And with the exception of London services (which already use bi-modes) it only feeds into other non-electrified routes.

It's not likely to happen any time soon.
What is the linespeed (main and relief, current and planned, if different) on the GWML between Cardiff and Severn Tunnel Junction? I often forget that the class 756s have a lower maximum speed (75mph) compared to the other UK FLIRT units - perhaps that could be an issue for GWML services? My own view is that any 756s released from Coryton services should be redeployed to oust 398s from the TAM Valleys north of Taff's Well (avoiding the need to order more 398s for the planned Cardiff Bay to Cardiff East on-street.
Cardiff - Newport is 95HST/75 on the mains, and 60 on the reliefs. Newport - Severn Tunnel Junction is 90HST/75 on the mains and 40 on the reliefs (bar a short section of 60 in one direction).

75mph services do already run on the main lines between Cardiff and Newport without too much issues. 67&MKIV services are not allowed to run at HST speeds, and there are still occasional 150s & 153s on Ebbw Vale & Cheltenham services.

I'm sure I read somewhere the plan is for 75 on the reliefs though. The signal spacing is already the same as on the mains.
 

positron

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2022
Messages
735
Location
Cardiff
Fwiw the 756s being 75mph is probably changeable too, I believe it's to do with how the gear box is setup. I think they've traded top speed for acceleration. Other UK trains have had their top speeds changed before as far as I understand.
 

Adlee Turner

Member
Joined
6 Nov 2018
Messages
62
Apparently 231002 and 756108 are both currently working to Pontypridd on 5Q40 from Cardiff Canton then back to Central and to later return from Central on 5Q41 and return back to Cardiff Canton. Not sure how true it is for both of these to be operating together but according to internal information this is the case.
 

CHAPS2034

Member
Joined
13 Mar 2018
Messages
651
There is a movement on RTT on for Monday 16th from Canton to Holyhead


It is being suggested elsewhere that this is a Type 37 dragging a Class 231.

Assuming this is true, any comments as to why a 231 should be being moved so far away from its home territory?
 

craigybagel

Established Member
Joined
25 Oct 2012
Messages
5,830
There is a movement on RTT on for Monday 16th from Canton to Holyhead


It is being suggested elsewhere that this is a Type 37 dragging a Class 231.

Assuming this is true, any comments as to why a 231 should be being moved so far away from its home territory?
Most likely to visit the wheel lathe. There was talk before of having plans in place so that the fleets based around Cardiff could still visit the North depots for tire turning if necessary, this might be a test of this.
 

CHAPS2034

Member
Joined
13 Mar 2018
Messages
651
Most likely to visit the wheel lathe. There was talk before of having plans in place so that the fleets based around Cardiff could still visit the North depots for tire turning if necessary, this might be a test of this.

Thank you

I wondered if it was for the wheel lathe. I assume there is one at Canton that the FLIRTS normally go to, but it is good to be able to have an alternative under your own control if needed.
 

Top