• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the secret sealed document and his arrest

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,560
Location
Taunton or Kent
The timing of Andrew's formal title-stripping was coincidentally when both Question Time (live) and Have I got News for You (recorded the night before broadcast) were recording, so both programmes were interrupted to have this announced. Once wonders if Charles did this deliberately to ensure these programmes could cover it in time.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Ediswan

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2012
Messages
3,459
Location
Stevenage
The timing of Andrew's formal title-stripping was coincidentally when both Question Time (live) and Have I got News for You (recorded the night before broadcast) were recording, so both programmes were interrupted to have this announced. Once wonders if Charles did this deliberately to ensure these programmes could cover it in time.
Live* on iPlayer. Recorded for BBC1.

* To the exent that anything potentially controversial is truly live.
 

martin butler

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2018
Messages
883
Given the network Epstein wound round himself, I would guess there will be a lot of powerful famous names, who would not want their activities to become public knowledge, I would not be surprised if Andrew has become the very high-profile distraction, whilst pressure is placed elsewhere to ensure the names never do get released, by the current US administration.
 

Peter C

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2018
Messages
4,739
Location
GWR land
Two articles from BBC News this evening (06/11/2025):

King Charles III has officially stripped his brother Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his HRH style and prince title.
Wednesday's entry into the UK's official public record shows that the change has been formally recorded after it came into effect last week.
The King made the changes following weeks of intense scrutiny over the former prince's links to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The record also confirmed his removal from the Roll of Peerage as the Duke of York, which had also been previously announced.
The entry published in The Gazette reads:
"The King has been pleased by Letters Patent under the Great Seal of the Realm dated 3 November 2025 to declare that Andrew Mountbatten Windsor shall no longer be entitled to hold and enjoy the style, title or attribute of 'Royal Highness' and the titular dignity of 'Prince'."
The Great Seal of the Realm refers to a wax seal, and is used by the Crown to show the monarch's approval of important State documents.
Buckingham Palace said last week that Andrew would leave his Royal Lodge home in Windsor, as his links to Epstein continued to cause controversy.
It was understood that he did not object to the King's decision to remove his titles.
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor - as he is now to be known - gave up his other royal titles in October, including the Duke of York, after more questions and allegations about his private life.
At the start of this year, emails showed that he had stayed in contact with Epstein for longer than he had previously admitted.
In a posthumous memoir published last month, Virginia Giuffre - a prominent accuser of Epstein - repeated allegations that, as a teenager, she had sex with Andrew on three separate occasions. Andrew has always strenuously denied the claims.

And this one, only just added to the website, but reported on PM on Radio 4 about 25 minutes ago:
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor has been asked by democrats in US Congress to answer questions as part of its investigation into paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Congressman Robert Garcia wrote to Andrew in a letter addressed to Royal Lodge, Windsor Great Park, which the former prince had agreed to leave.
The panel, which does not have the power to subpoena Andrew, intends to ask questions related to "information on Epstein's operations, network, and associates based on the men's longstanding and well-documented friendship", a statement from the House Oversight Committee said.
The letter comes after King Charles stripped Andrew of his HRH style and prince title.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
You can receive Breaking News on a smartphone or tablet via the
BBC News App. You can also follow @BBCBreaking on X, external to get the latest alerts.

-Peter
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,560
Location
Taunton or Kent
Now closing down business interests he had:


Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is closing down some of his last remaining known business interests, including Pitch@Palace Global Ltd.
Pitch@Palace was a Dragon's Den-style start-up competition where entrepreneurs could present their ideas to potential investors, and was once seen as a possible source of income for the former prince, after the King stopped supporting him financially.
A document announcing the application to dissolve the company was filed with Companies House on Tuesday, signed by the company's only director Arthur Lancaster.
Mr Mountbatten-Windsor and Mr Lancaster have been approached for comment.
The decision to close Pitch@Palace marks another phase in the former prince's retreat from public life, after intense scrutiny over his links to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The pitching competition suspended operations in 2019, following an interview Mr Mountbatten-Windsor gave to BBC Newsnight, which led to him stepping down as a working royal and the removal of his royal titles.
The UK side of the business was wound up in 2021, but the international part, Pitch@Palace Global, remained open.
It became a further source of controversy when the founder of the Chinese arm of Pitch@Palace, Yang Tengbo, was accused of being a spy - which he denied.
A Dutch company, Startup Bootcamp, previously said it was interested in buying the business, issuing a press release saying it saw "immense value" in the former Pitch@Palace network. However, the deal unravelled earlier this year.
Most of the cash left on Pitch@Palace Global's balance sheet has been withdrawn in recent years. The latest set of accounts showed that it had just £10,965 left at the end of March, down from £220,990 the year before.
Mr Lancaster is understood to hold the shares in Pitch@Palace Global on Mr Mountbatten-Windsor's behalf. The latter is listed as a person with significant control under his former title, Prince Andrew.
Another company with links to the former Prince, Innovate Global Ltd, also began the process of closing down on Tuesday.
Arthur Lancaster is the sole director of this company, too, and he signed the application to strike the company off, according to documents filed at Companies House on Tuesday.
A plan to relaunch some of the international activities of Pitch@Palace under the brand Innovate Global was mentioned in a 2023 witness statement given by Mr Yang.
Mr Mountbatten-Windsor's name does not appear on the paperwork for Innovate Global Ltd. It has no employees and virtually no assets.
It was announced on Tuesday that Mr Mountbatten-Windsor's surname should be spelled with a hyphen.
Versions with and without the hyphen have been used in the past, but a 1960 Privy Council announcement used the hyphenated version, which will be used from now on.
 

Peter C

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2018
Messages
4,739
Location
GWR land
They've also just mentioned on Radio 4 - and I note also at the bottom of that article - that his surname is now hyphenated. So I suppose he can't complain about losing his titles when he's gained an extra bit of punctuation. ;)

-Peter
 
Joined
22 Jan 2024
Messages
588
Location
Yorkshire
Given the network Epstein wound round himself, I would guess there will be a lot of powerful famous names, who would not want their activities to become public knowledge, I would not be surprised if Andrew has become the very high-profile distraction, whilst pressure is placed elsewhere to ensure the names never do get released, by the current US administration.

Quite probably. It's also remarkably convenient for such shadowy people that both Epstein himself, and Andrew's principal accuser, both "committed suicide".
 

martin butler

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2018
Messages
883
Quite probably. It's also remarkably convenient for such shadowy people that both Epstein himself, and Andrew's principal accuser, both "committed suicide".
Epstein's " suicide" looks to be anything but, too many things went wrong, at the wrong time, and his body showed signs of strangulation, that would not be there if he had hung himself, He was after all in a maximum security prison, with guards, and CCTV, death by hanging would take long enough for the alarm to have been raised, It has all the signs of being a officially sanctioned execution
 

SteveP29

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2011
Messages
1,181
Location
Edinburgh/ Chester le Street
Now closing down business interests he had:


He has his wedge, made mostly off the back of us mugs.
He doesn't need a job or a public profile, he can sit on his ar*e for the rest of his days watching TOWIE or some such and never have to been seen in public again
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,560
Location
Taunton or Kent
Here's the latest photo of him released in the first tranche of Epstein files:


Photo appears to show Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor with Ghislaine Maxwell
​

A photo in the released files appears to show former prince Andrew laying across five people, whose faces are redacted. Ghislaine Maxwell is seen in the image standing behind them.

Andrew has faced years of scrutiny over his past friendship with Epstein, who does not appear in the photo. He has repeatedly denied all wrongdoing in relation to Epstein, and said he did not “see, witness or suspect any behaviour of the sort that subsequently led to his arrest and conviction”.

df53e8be-cde9-40d1-bf2b-6e42cbaf85f3.png.webp

(Image of Andrew Windsor lying across five people (faces redacted), with Ghislaine Maxwell standing behind them)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Oh dear:


We can now bring you another email exchange between Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, and "The Invisible Man".

We've seen this alias attached to two separate email addresses, one of which is listed in Epstein's phone book under a contact labelled "Duke of York".

One exchange between Maxwell and "The Invisible Man" discusses a trip to Peru.

On 27 February 2002, an email from an address labelled "Juanesteban Ganoza" is sent to Maxwell about plans for a visit.

Ganoza suggests activities including horse riding and restaurant lunches.

At the end of the email, Ganoza asks: "About the girls... how old is he? I doubt it that he will find someone here, but we can try."

This email is forwarded by Maxwell to "The Invisible Man" on abx17@dial.pipex.com, along with the message: "What do you think[?]"

On 28 February 2002, "The Invisible Man" replies to Maxwell from a different account - aace@dial.pipex.com. As a reminder, this is the address listed in Epstein's phone book.

The email reads: "As for girls well I leave that entirely to you and Juan Estoban!"

On 3 March 2002, Maxwell forwards an email to aace@dial.pipex.com, which begins: "Thought you would like to see what I sent."

Below is the following: "Some sight seeing some 2 legged sight seeing (read intelligent pretty fun and from good families) and he will be very happy.

"I know I can rely on you to show him a wonderful time and that you will only introduce him to friends that you can trust and rely on to be friendly and discreet and fun. He does not want to read about any trip in the papers whom or what he saw."

Here's that email exchange in full:



572bb1d6-ed16-4c2d-af50-eb35ec6d02bb.png.webp

(Image of email from Ghislaine Maxwell to "The Invisible Man" about a Peru trip and discussing girls on the trip)
 
Last edited:

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,560
Location
Taunton or Kent
Not getting any better for Andrew:


Photographs appearing to show Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor kneeling on all fours over a female lying on the ground have been included in the latest batch of Epstein files released by the US Department of Justice.
In two of the images, he is seen touching the person, who is unidentified and fully clothed, on her stomach. Another image shows him staring directly at the camera.
No context is supplied for the photos and it is unclear when and where they were taken.
The images are likely to put further pressure on Mountbatten-Windsor, who has faced years of scrutiny over his past friendship with Epstein. BBC News has approached Mountbatten-Windsor for comment. He has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing.
Mountbatten-Windsor was stripped of his royal titles in October after increasing scrutiny over his links to the paedophile Epstein.
Separate emails released on Friday also suggest the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein invited Mountbatten-Windsor to have dinner with a 26-year-old Russian woman. The messages were exchanged in August 2010, two years after the billionaire Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor.
The newly released email exchanges and photos form part of more than three million pages of documents and 180,000 images made public on Friday.
Other pictures released show redacted images of unidentified women, and what appear to be luxury apartments, hotel rooms, and a villa with a swimming pool.

The emails between Epstein and an account named "The Duke" on 11 and 12 August 2010 suggest that the American wanted to introduce "A" to a 26-year-old Russian woman, whom Epstein suggests he "might enjoy having dinner with".
He says that the woman would be in London in August 2010.
"The Duke" replies that he would be in Geneva "until the morning of the 22nd but would be delighted to see her" before asking: "Will she be bringing a message from you? Please give her my contact details to get in touch."
He asks Epstein whether there is "any other information you might know about her that might be useful to know?"
Epstein replies that "she [is] 26, russian, clevere [sic] beautiful, trustworthy and yes she has your email".
Epstein was convicted in 2008 of soliciting sex from a 14-year-old girl in Florida and completed his sentence in July 2010, a month before the email exchange. The BBC has not been able to independently verify the emails.
Also among the latest tranche of documents is an email exchange dated 27 September 2010 between Epstein and the account titled "The Duke".
Epstein writes that he is in London, adding: "What time woudl [sic] you like me and [redacted], we will also need/ have private time".
"The Duke" replies: "I am just departing Scotland should be down by 1800. I'll ring you when I get down if you can give me a number to ring. Alternatively we could have dinner at Buckingham Palace and lots of privacy. A".
Epstein replies: "bp pleease [sic]."
The emails do not indicate any wrongdoing. The BBC has contacted Mountbatten-Windsor for a response.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cevnmxyy4wjo
They said documentary evidence "has revealed information suggesting that Prince Andrew had knowledge that Maxwell recruited females to engage in sex acts with Epstein and other men" and "there is evidence that Prince Andrew engaged in sexual conduct involving one of Epstein's victims".
The letter also said: "Prince Andrew is not presently a target of the investigation, and US authorities have not, to date, gathered evidence that he has committed any crime under US law."
Mountbatten-Windsor has repeatedly denied all wrongdoing in relation to Epstein, and said he did not "see, witness or suspect any behaviour of the sort that subsequently led to his arrest and conviction".
He has faced allegations, which he repeatedly denied, that he sexually assaulted Virginia Giuffre as a teenager after she said she was trafficked by Epstein.
He paid a financial settlement to Giuffre, who he claims to have never met, to settle a civil sexual assault claim in 2022.
 

alex397

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2017
Messages
2,037
Location
UK
I’m sure it was just a straightforward game of Twister he was playing. Nothing more…
 

dgl

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2014
Messages
3,069
She was on the floor blocking my way, in trying to get passed I tripped and ended up over her.
So glad the Queen has passed as think what all these new revelations would have done to her.
 
Last edited:

Welly

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2013
Messages
670
He is going to move into Marsh Farm in Sandringham. Perfect address for exile!
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,657
Location
LBK
So glad the Queen has passed as think what all these new revelations would have done to her.
Why should anyone feel sorry for her? She didn't strip his titles or exile Andrew, her son is the one who did.
 

Buzby

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2023
Messages
1,697
Location
Glasgow, Scotland
He is going to move into Marsh Farm in Sandringham. Perfect address for exile!
Not according to the latest media reports. There’s a damp problem (Hint is in the property name) and Charlie boy is searching for urgent alternatives.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,855
Location
Oakham
Not according to the latest media reports. There’s a damp problem (Hint is in the property name) and Charlie boy is searching for urgent alternatives.
There's a suitable secure property which has spacious basement accommodation immediately available for use at EC3N 4AB; it also has the advantage of being directly owned by His Majesty.
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,834
So glad the Queen has passed as think what all these new revelations would have done to her

Why? With hindsight the way she treated him makes her an enabler. He could do no wrong in her eyes, and I just don’t believe that nobody in the palace had any idea what was happening
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,044
Location
Up the creek
I am no fan of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and do not know if the three photos that I have seen on the BBC and Guardian’s websites are all the photos. However, there could be an innocent, or at least fairly innocent, explanation. For example: a girl collapses at a party, Mountbatten-Windsor is nearest and goes to help or does so because, as a result of his naval service, he still has some knowledge of First Aid. Somebody then takes the photos and puts them away, possibly with future dishonest use in mind. And…publishing now takes the attention away from a certain D.Trump.

I know that this sounds like a conspiracy theory, but it is not. However odious some of the people involved are, jumping to the worst conclusions immediately can be what some want. And there is a lot of deviousness throughout the whole sorry saga.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,128
Location
Redcar
Why should anyone feel sorry for her? She didn't strip his titles or exile Andrew, her son is the one who did.

And isn't the speculation that it's Charles' son William who is one of the driving forces behind him finally taking some vague sort of action against Andrew?
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
11,145
Location
Redcar
I am no fan of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and do not know if the three photos that I have seen on the BBC and Guardian’s websites are all the photos. However, there could be an innocent, or at least fairly innocent, explanation. For example: a girl collapses at a party, Mountbatten-Windsor is nearest and goes to help or does so because, as a result of his naval service, he still has some knowledge of First Aid. Somebody then takes the photos and puts them away, possibly with future dishonest use in mind. And…publishing now takes the attention away from a certain D.Trump.

I know that this sounds like a conspiracy theory, but it is not. However odious some of the people involved are, jumping to the worst conclusions immediately can be what some want. And there is a lot of deviousness throughout the whole sorry saga.

While a person behind is laid back with their feet on the table without a care in the world? Or maybe they had eaten the same fish dish and were next in line for treatment.

There's nothing innocent about this bloke. Compulsive liar too.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,657
Location
LBK
And isn't the speculation that it's Charles' son William who is one of the driving forces behind him finally taking some vague sort of action against Andrew?
Yes. This seems likely. Nonetheless it appears to have been a wise strategy as they are at least ahead of the story now. Andrew is humiliated every time the BBC call him by his name instead of his title.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,044
Location
Up the creek
While a person behind is laid back with their feet on the table without a care in the world? Or maybe they had eaten the same fish dish and were next in line for treatment.

There's nothing innocent about this bloke. Compulsive liar too.

All of the three photos seem to show the woman flat on her back in a position that could indicate a sudden collapse and his position is at least consistent with checking on her. I am not saying that there is nothing untoward happening, merely that one should be careful about automatically assuming that there is. There is an old trick of making something appear suspicious, then proving it isn’t so that whenever other accusations are made, you can always say,’ This is untrue just like that one.’
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,657
Location
LBK
All of the three photos seem to show the woman flat on her back in a position that could indicate a sudden collapse and his position is at least consistent with checking on her.
...at the serial rapist and paedophile's house.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,657
Location
LBK
However the woman in this photo isn't underage and, as far as we know, may be pictured taking part in entirely consensual activity.
I don't think anyone is suggesting otherwise. Merely being at the rapist and paedophile's house and attending his parties, many times, even maintaining contact after his convictions, is quite enough.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,734
Location
Scotland
Is that known? In the photos I’ve seen it’s all redacted?
It's been reported that the woman was something like 25 years old at the time the photo was taken.
Merely being at the rapist and paedophile's house and attending his parties, many times, even maintaining contact after his convictions, is quite enough.
I agree, and I'm not suggesting for a moment that he's not been involved in reprehensible conduct, just pointing out that this particular picture doesn't necessarily depict that conduct.
 

Top