With all the recent discussion around AI and concerns around it producing inaccurate information and increasing our dependence on technology, I'd be interested to compare it with other inventions throughout history, which with all the pros and cons added up, have proven to create more problems than they have solved, or tried to solve problems which didn't exist.
Let's take the motor car for example. Most people would agree that it has revolutionised mobility to the point where we have more convenience and freedom in where we live, work and shop. To counterbalance that however, they have been responsible for congesting our streets, polluting our atmosphere and shifting local businesses out of villages and towns. Whether one would say cars have been a net positive or negative for society is up for debate, but the decarbonisation of vehicles and their energy source should definitely swing the pendulum well within the positive side.
Driverless cars on the other hand are more likely to swing to being net-negative as they won't really solve the other two problems, and the main one which it is intended to solve (allowing those unable to drive to access personal transport), could be achieved if public transport and motability schemes were better funded by local councils or central government. They are also likely to create problems such as higher unnecessary car ownership, even more road congestion and risk of software malfunction.
Can you think of any other examples of inventions throughout history that were really "solutions looking for a problem"?
Let's take the motor car for example. Most people would agree that it has revolutionised mobility to the point where we have more convenience and freedom in where we live, work and shop. To counterbalance that however, they have been responsible for congesting our streets, polluting our atmosphere and shifting local businesses out of villages and towns. Whether one would say cars have been a net positive or negative for society is up for debate, but the decarbonisation of vehicles and their energy source should definitely swing the pendulum well within the positive side.
Driverless cars on the other hand are more likely to swing to being net-negative as they won't really solve the other two problems, and the main one which it is intended to solve (allowing those unable to drive to access personal transport), could be achieved if public transport and motability schemes were better funded by local councils or central government. They are also likely to create problems such as higher unnecessary car ownership, even more road congestion and risk of software malfunction.
Can you think of any other examples of inventions throughout history that were really "solutions looking for a problem"?
Last edited: