Or, where they sit!I've always hated reservations both as a guard and a passenger. They have their uses for groups but otherwise they just cause conflict. Get rid of them for me and everyone knows where they stand.
002 hasn't yet been seen anywhere in this country so we're not so sure at the momentOn another different, yet OT note, is part of 810002 still in Italy for testing?
Now that 810s have actually entered service, is there a need for 002 still to be there?
All the 222s have handback dates as do the 810s have planned arrival dates (the latter having more flexibility)I think it was mentioned up thread or on the class 222 thread that the arrangements with the leasing company determine when they go off lease.
Does anybody know if there is a definitive handback date that they have to be released by?
Or have EMR been fortunate enough to negotiate a rolling extension based on lumos requirements?
Hopefully the initial teething issues get ironed out for a smoother introduction to the rest of the fleetWhat's been clear in these last two weeks is that Class 810s still have quite a few faults that are causing them either to be substituted before the daily diagram or during it.
In the perfect world you would have at least two sets being able to run their diagrams reliably with at least a third set able to be on standby. At the moment it feels like you ideally need four sets to run two diagrams. It seems though one set can only run for 2 or 3 days and then needs a day in the depot to rectify faults.
Yes, currently staff are carefully diagrammed onto 810s while training is ongoing. The other restriction is that most of the 5 car diagrams involve double units so they can't run as 810s until more of the fleet are inWould I be right in thinking the other issue is that 810's cannot easily be swapped onto other diagrams due to there not being enough staff trained to crew them?
It might have joined the Danish IC4 train in Libya!002 hasn't yet been seen anywhere in this country so we're not so sure at the moment
A couple of carriages of 810002 was seen by myself being loaded onto low loaders several years ago for onward movement to Italy for climate testing.002 hasn't yet been seen anywhere in this country so we're not so sure at the moment
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
All the 222s have handback dates as do the 810s have planned arrival dates (the latter having more flexibility)
Hopefully the initial teething issues get ironed out for a smoother introduction to the rest of the fleet
Yes, currently staff are carefully diagrammed onto 810s while training is ongoing. The other restriction is that most of the 5 car diagrams involve double units so they can't run as 810s until more of the fleet are in
Realtime Trains | 5Q64 0805 Darlington to Etches Park Sdgs | 20/12/2025
Real-time train running information for 5Q64 0805 departure from Darlington to Etches Park Sdgs on 20/12/2025. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
Just seen this at Sheffield, yes 810013810013 is currently sat at Darlington and due to work to Etches Park, Derby. This is the latest unit to get delivered.
Oh dear. What caused today's failure?810012 is now out of service leaving 0 Auroras in service today
Door IssuesOh dear. What caused today's failure?
Get rid of them for me and everyone knows where they stand.
Or, more likely, not know whether they will be standing or seatedOr, where they sit!![]()
I wasn't far wrong reallyThis has got disaster written all over it. Stinks of panic over losing the Meridians to Lumo and being short of stock along with the usual political situation of "let's just get one unit into service to meet the latest dates we have promised."
Perhaps not, however the 810 is the 3rd(?) itteration of the 800 series, clearly Hitachi have lots more work to do to apply lessons learnt and sort out their quality, from simple assembly/build issues, to the more complex capability and supplier quality issues.I wonder if this level of failure is typical for the early days of a new train type?
Yes, absolutely.I wonder if this level of failure is typical for the early days of a new train type?
Baring in mind a 810 is basically a new train compared to the earlier 8Xx fleet.Perhaps not, however the 810 is the 3rd(?) itteration of the 800 series, clearly Hitachi have lots more work to do to apply lessons learnt and sort out their quality, from simple assembly/build issues, to the more complex capability and supplier quality issues.
Not quite, more a repackaged design using many subsystems from an established in service design. Even the 80x classes inherited the stir friction-welded bodies and much of the bogie design which was originally incorporated in the JR Mini Shinkansen units. Of course there are detail changes within the Hitachi A-train designs both in development and in production processes, so these changes can introduce (or remove) issues that didn't surface previously, notably stress fractures, but there are many similarities throughout the range that ensure a shared experiences in their introductions.Baring in mind a 810 is basically a new train compared to the earlier 8Xx fleet.
Only if they start catching fire…(hopefully not).Reading about the poor reliability delayed introduction perhaps they should change the trains numbering from class 810 to class 180's.
There has been several 'thermal events' already involving the 810s during the test process.Only if they start catching fire…(hopefully not).
I always thought it was a curse that they share the same numbers as those in 180!Reading about the poor reliability delayed introduction perhaps they should change the trains numbering from class 810 to class 180's.